Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of the matching fund program on IPO and bankruptcy of SMEs in Korea

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Korea struggle in financing R&D. Thus, the Korea Core Industrial Technology Investment Association (KITIA) was established to implement a matching fund program (MFP) to help SMEs with this undertaking. Applicant firms to the MFP are reviewed first based on their technology levels and are required to attract financing from venture capitalists (VCs), before receiving funds from the MFP. This paper, based on KITIAs MFP applicant data from 2001 to 2004, evaluates the performance of the MFP in terms of the success rate of funded SMEs’ initial public offerings (IPOs) and bankruptcy rates in relation to those SMEs that could not attract matching funds. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate selection bias from the data in order to assess the actual treatment effect of the MFP. According to the result of logistic regression applied to the matched data, MFP apparently did not have significant effects on IPO success and bankruptcy. This implies that MFP needs to allow VCs more time to evaluate SMEs covering qualitative aspects as well. It is expected that this change of structure can provide better performance of MFP in terms of IPO success and bankruptcy of matched SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balcaen, S., Manigart, S., Buyze, J., & Ooghe, H. (2011). Firm exit after distress differentiating between bankruptcy, voluntary liquidation and M&A. Small Business Economics. 39, 949–975. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9342-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, E., & Israel, R. (1998). The bankruptcy decision and debt contract renegotiations. European Finance Review, 2, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J. (2004). Venture capital financing, strategic alliances, and the initial public offerings of Internet startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 721–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chava, S., & Jarrow, R. A. (2004). Bankruptcy prediction with industry effects. Review of Finance, 8, 537–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Crisis and the content of managerial communications a study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 634–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demers, E. A., & Joos, P. (2007). IPO failure risk. Journal of Accounting Research, 45, 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisdorfer, A., & Hsu, P. H. (2009). Innovate to survive: The effect of technology competition on corporate bankruptcy, working paper, University of Connecticut.

  • Engel, D., & Keilbach, M. (2007). Firm-level implications of early stage venture capital investment: An empirical investigation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 14(2), 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, I. (2000). Social contracts and the impact of matching fund requirements on American Research Universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(22), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, J. (2005). Is venture capital worth it? Effects on firm performance and founder returns. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., & Johnson, R. A. (1996). Do managers and strategies matter? A study in crisis. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeussler, C., Harhoff, D., Mueller, E. (2009). To be financed or not…—The role of patents for venture capital financing. Discussion papers 253, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.

  • Halliday, T. C., Powell, M. J., & Granfors, M. W. (1987). Minimalist organizations: vital events in the state bar associations: 1870–1930. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 456–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching is an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T. (2000). Venture capitalists: The coaches of silicon valley. In C.-M. Lee, W. F. Miller, M. G. Hancock & H. S. Rowen (Eds.), The silicon valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 57, 169–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2007). Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures. Copenhagen: Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2007.

  • Jain, B. A., & Kini, O. (1999). The life cycle of initial public offering firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26, 1281–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N., Sensoy, B. A., & Stromberg, Per. (2009). Should investors bet on the jockey or the horse? Evidence from the evolution of firms from early business plans to public companies. Journal of Finance, 64, 75–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N., & Stromberg, P. (2001). Venture capitalists as principals: Contracting, screening, and monitoring. The America Economic Review, 91(2), 426–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. H., & Heshmati, A. (2006). Analysis of Korean IT start-up’s initial public offering and their post-IPO performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(2), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, M. (2001). Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption. In M. Lechner & F. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Econometric evaluation of labour market policies. Heidelberg: Physica/Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, M., Ma, Y. Y., & Tashjian, E. (2009). Survival of the fittest? Financial and economic distress and restructuring decisions in Chapter 11. Singapore: Paper presented at the Third Singapore Conference on Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3), 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksimovic, V. & Phillips, G. (1997). Asset efficiency and reallocation decisions of bankrupt firms, working paper, University of Maryland.

  • Mann, R. J., & Sager, T. W. (2007). Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups. Research Policy, 36, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A. (1991). Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 56, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, T. H., & Sohn, S. Y. (2010). Technology credit scoring model considering both SME characteristics and economic conditions: The Korean case. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 666–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G. C., & Marriott, R. (1998). Why has the investment performance of technology-specialist, European venture capital funds been so poor? Research Policy, 27(9), 947–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ooghe, H., Joos, P., & De Bourdeaudhuij, C. (1995). Financial distress models in Belgium: The results of a decade of empirical research. The International Journal of Accounting, 30(3), 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooghe, H., & Waeyaert, N. (2004). Oorzaken van faling: literatuuroverzicht en conceptueal Verklarings model. Economisch en Sociaal Tijdschrift, 57, 367–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompe, P. P. M., & Bilderbeek, J. (2005). The prediction of bankruptcy of small and medium-sized industrial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 847–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlman, W. A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 473–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48, 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, S. Y., & Heo, I. S. (2010). What do venture capitalists consider important when evaluating ventures to match a government support fund?. Seoul: Technical Report Yonsei University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timothy, R. D. (2009). The rise and fall of the participating securities SBIC program: Lessons in public venture capital management. Perspectives In Public Affairs School Of Public Affairs Arizona State University, 6(spring), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelderen, M., Bosma, N., & Thurik, R. (2006). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., Wang, K., & Lu, Q. (2003). Effects of venture capitalists’ participation in listed companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 2015–2034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1997). Financial constraints on the growth of high technology small firms in the United Kingdom. Applied Financial Economics, 7(2), 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W. (2007). Cultivating research universities and industrial linkages in China: The case of Shanghai. World Development, 35(6), 1075–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis, A. L., & Meyer, G. D. (2000). The potential of actuarial decision models: can they improve the venture capital investment decision? Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Industrial Engineering, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    In Seok Heo, So Young Sohn & Eun Jeong Ji

Authors
  1. In Seok Heo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. So Young Sohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eun Jeong Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to So Young Sohn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heo, I.S., Sohn, S.Y. & Ji, E.J. Effects of the matching fund program on IPO and bankruptcy of SMEs in Korea. Small Bus Econ 42, 117–129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9467-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9467-3

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation