The evolution of bank loan price and non-price terms and conditions (T&Cs) for the 2009–2011 period are investigated using firm-level survey data for a sample of Eurozone small and medium-sized enterprises. The raw firm responses, which are of a discrete nature denoting tightening or easing of the T&Cs, or no change at all, are modeled by a bivariate ordered probit model. According to the results obtained, there are sizeable differences between countries, with the protagonists of the sovereign debt crisis (Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain) exhibiting predicted probabilities of tightening that are considerably above the Eurozone average. In addition, price T&Cs exhibit a substantial tightening over time. Finally, firms’ net interest expenses and profitability emerge as important determinants in explaining the cross-sectional variation in bank loan T&Cs that they face.
Bank loan Bivariate ordered probit Terms and conditions Small and medium enterprises
C25 G21 L26
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
I would like to thank two anonymous referees for their insightful comments. Any remaining errors and ambiguities remain my responsibility.
Financial support was provided by the Athens University of Economics and Business Research Center (ELKE).
Audretsch, D., & Elston, J. (2002). Does firm size matters?: Evidence on the impact of liquidity constraints on firm investment. International Journal of Industrial Organization,20, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A., Klapper, L., & Udell, G. (2001). The ability of banks to lend to informationally opaque small businesses. Journal of Banking and Finance,25, 2127–2167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A., & Udell, G. (1990). Collateral, loan quality, and bank risk. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,8, 839–856.Google Scholar
Berger, A., & Udell, G. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small business finance. Journal of Business,68(3), 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, M., & Loeys, J. (1988). Bond covenants and delegated monitoring. Journal of Finance,43(2), 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, M., & Mester, L. (1992). Debt covenants and renegotiation. Journal of Financial Intermediation,2, 95–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boocock, G., & Woods, M. (1997). The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: Evidence from a UK venture fund. International Small Business Journal,16, 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brick, I., & Palia, D. (2007). Evidence of jointness in the terms of relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation,16, 452–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1984). Panel data. In S. Griliches & M. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (pp. 1247–1318). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Cressy, R. (1996). Are business startups credit rationed? Economic Journal,106, 1253–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressy, R., & Toivanen, O. (2001). Is there adverse selection in the credit market? Venture Capital,3(3), 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, D. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies,51, 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, D. (1991). Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy,99, 688–721.Google Scholar
Eurostat Pocketbooks. (2011). Key figures on European business with a special feature on SMEs. Eurostat, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1994). Monetary policy, business cycles and the behavior of small manufacturing firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics,109, 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, S., & Himmelberg, D. (1995). Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics,36, 541–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, X., & Schiantarelli, F. (1994). Investment and financing constraints: A switching regression approach using US firm panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics,80, 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J., & McGuckin, R. (1997). Firm performance and evolution: Empirical regularities in the US microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change,6, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance,29(2), 449–470.Google Scholar
Mundlack, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross-section data. Econometrica,46(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliner, S., & Rudebusch, G. (1992). Sources of the financing hierarchy for business investment. Review of Economics and Statistics,74(2), 643–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance,49, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posey, R., & Reichert, A. (2011). Terms of lending for small business lines of credit: The role of loan guarantees. International Journal of Business and Finance Research,5(1), 91–102.Google Scholar
Sajaia, Z. (2008). Maximum likelihood estimation of a bivariate ordered probit model: Implementation and Monte Carlo simulations. The Stata Journal, 2,1–18.Google Scholar
Strahan, P. (1999). “Borrower risk and the price and nonprice terms of bank loans”, Staff Report 90. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Google Scholar
Vijverberg, C. (2004). An empirical financial accelerator model: Small firms’ investment and credit rationing. Journal of Macroeconomics,26, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, W. (2005). How are loans by their main bank priced? Bank effects, information and non-price terms of contract. The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) Discussion Paper Series 05-E-028. RIETI, Tokyo. Available at: http://www.rieti.go.jp/en