Subjectivity in credit allocation to micro-entrepreneurs: evidence from Brazil
- 815 Downloads
This paper estimates the impact of loan officer subjectivity on microcredit granting by exploiting an exceptionally detailed database from a Brazilian microfinance institution. The loan officers collect field data, meet with applicants, and make recommendations to the credit committee, which has the final say on both loan approval and loan size (LS). The loan officer’s subjectivity is captured through gender bias. Our estimations indeed show subjective gender gap in LS. This gap is almost exclusively attributable to loan officers. We interpret this finding as evidence that, despite monitoring and wage incentivization, microcredit officers let their subjective preferences interfere with loan granting. We conclude by suggesting alternative means to curb subjectivity in credit allocation to micro-entrepreneurs.
KeywordsSubjectivity Microcredit Gender Loan officer Loan size Entrepreneurs
JEL ClassificationsO16 D82 J33 L31
- Agier, I., & Szafarz, A. (2010). Microfinance and gender: Is there a glass ceiling in loan size? Université Libre de Bruxelles CEB Working Papers 10-047.Google Scholar
- Alesina, A. F., Lotti, F., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2008). Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series 14202.Google Scholar
- Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Brana, S. (2011). Microcredit: An answer to the gender problem in funding? Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9346-3.
- Churchill, C. F. (1999). Client focused lending—the art of individual lending. Toronto, ON: Calmeadow.Google Scholar
- Diagne, A., Zeller, M., & Sharma, M. (2000). Empirical measurements of households’ access to credit and credit constraints in developing countries: Methodological issues and evidence. IFPRI Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper 90, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Ghosh, S., & Van Tassel, E. (2008). A model of mission drift in microfinance institutions. Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University Working Papers 08003, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
- Hand, D. J., & Henley, W. E. (2007). Statistical classification methods in consumer credit scoring: A review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 160(3), 523–541.Google Scholar
- Holland-Noronha, N. (2010). Economic and sociocultural experiences of female entrepreneurs in Brazil and the United States: An exploratorial and empirical analysis. PhD Dissertation, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
- Labie, M., Méon, P.-G., Mersland, R., & Szafarz, A. (2010). Discrimination by microcredit officers: Theory and evidence on disability in Uganda. Université Libre de Bruxelles CEB Working Papers 10-007.Google Scholar
- Lewis, E. M. (1994). Introduction to credit scoring. San Rafael, CA: Athena Press.Google Scholar
- McKim, A., & Hughart, M. (2005). Staff incentive schemes in practice: Finding of a global survey of microfinance institutions. MicroFinance Network, CGAP.Google Scholar
- Mueller, S. L., & Dato-On, M. C. (2011). A cross cultural study of gender-role orientation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. doi: 10.1007/s11365-011-0187-y.
- Pelegrino, A. I. C. (2006). Trabalho informal: a questão das mulheres das favelas de Praia da Rosa e Sapucaia. In Cidade, Transformaçõesno mundo do trabalho e políticas públicas. A questão do comércio ambulante em tempos de globalização (pp. 31–49). Rio de Janeiro, Maria de Fatima Cabral Marques Gomes (Ed): DP&A editora.Google Scholar
- Ross, S. L., & Yinger, J. (2002). The color of credit: Mortgage discrimination, research methodology, and fair-lending enforcement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar