Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 417–434 | Cite as

Failing firms and successful entrepreneurs: serial entrepreneurship as a temporal portfolio

  • Saras D. SarasvathyEmail author
  • Anil R. Menon
  • Graciela Kuechle
Article

Abstract

Entrepreneurial performance is almost always confounded with firm performance. In this paper we argue for an instrumental view of the firm by formally showing that entrepreneurs can amplify their expected success rates by designing their careers as temporal portfolios that exploit contagion processes embedded in serial entrepreneurship. The advantages to holding concurrent portfolios that exploit heterogeneity are well known. The same advantages may be achieved in the serial context through contagion. Our model exploits an observation due to William Feller on the near equivalence of the two, statistically speaking. It also leads to empirically plausible implications about the size distribution of firms in the economy and illustrates the relevance of considering firms and entrepreneurs as distinct loci of analysis.

Keywords

Serial entrepreneurship Firm performance Industrial organization Population ecology Labor economics Financial economics 

JEL Classifications

G11 G24 J24 L25 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor James G. March for taking the time to give us detailed comments on feedback on an earlier version of this paper and the Darden School Foundation and Batten Institute for funding.

References

  1. Acs, Z., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z., Parsons, W., & Tracy, S. (2008). High impact firms: gazelles revisited. small business research summary, No. 328. Office of advocacy, U. S. small business administration. http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/rs328tot.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2010.
  3. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 41–57.Google Scholar
  5. Almus, M., & Nerlinger, E. A. (2000). Testing ‚Gibrat’s Law’ for young firms–empirical results for west Germany. Small Business Economics, 15, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alsos, G. A., & Kolvereid, L. (1999). The business gestation process of novice, serial, and parallel business founders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(4), 101–114.Google Scholar
  7. Amaral, M., Baptista, R., & Lima, F. (2009). Serial entrepreneurship: impact of human capital on time to re-entry. Small Business Economics, doi:  10.1007/s11187-009-9232-4.
  8. Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2004). Gibrat’s Law: Are services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24(3), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bahadur, R. R. (1960). Stochastic comparisons of tests. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 31, 276–295.Google Scholar
  10. Baird, D. G., & Morrison, E. R. (2005). Serial entrepreneurs and small business bankruptcies. Columbia Law Review, 105, 2310–2368.Google Scholar
  11. Baron, R. A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship, why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baron, R. A. (2000). Psychological perspectives on entrepreneurship: Cognitive and social factors in entrepreneurs’ success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barron, D. N., West, E., & Hannan, M. T. (1994). A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 381–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baum, J. A. C. (1989). Liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence: Exploring age dependence in the dissolution of organizational relationships and organizations. Proceedings of the Administrative Science Association of Canada, 1095, 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. Baum, J. R., Frese, M., & Baron, R. (2007). The psychology of entrepreneurship. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. BERR. (2008). High growth firms in the UK: Lessons from an analysis of comparative UK performance. BERR Economics paper No. 3, Nov 2008. http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file49042.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2010.
  18. Bertinelli, L., Cardi, O., Pamukcu, T., & Strobl, E. (2006). The evolution of the distribution of plant size: evidence from Luxemburg. Small Business Economics, 27, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1993). A comparison of new businesses established by “novice” and habitual” founders in Great Britain. International Small Business Journal, 12, 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, T. & Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23, 227–236.Google Scholar
  23. Botazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G., & Secchi, A. (2007). Invariances and diversities in the patterns of industrial evolution: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing industries. Small Business Economics, 29, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 63–77.Google Scholar
  25. Brandstaetter, H. (1997). Becoming an entrepreneur: A question of personality structure? Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brockhaus, R. H., Sr. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bruderl, J., & Schlussler, R. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 530–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Burke, A. E., FitzRoy, F. R. & Nolan, M. A. (2008). What makes a die-hard entrepreneur? Beyond the ‘employee or entrepreneur’ dichotomy. Small Business Economics, 31(2), 93–115.Google Scholar
  29. Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cader, H. A., & Leatherman, J. C. (2009). Small business survival and sample selection bias. Small Business Economics, 21, 2–17.Google Scholar
  31. Calvo, J. L. (2006). Testing Gibrat’s Law for small, young and innovating firms. Small Business Economics, 26, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Carter, S., & Ram, M. (2003). Reassessing portfolio entrepreneurship: Towards a multi-disciplinary approach. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Caves, R. E. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1947–1982.Google Scholar
  34. Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Christensen, L. R. (1971). Entrepreneurial income: How does it measure up? American Economic Review, 61, 575–585.Google Scholar
  36. Coleman, J. S. (1964). Introduction to mathematical sociology. London: The Free Press of Glencoe, Collier-Macmillan Ltd.Google Scholar
  37. Contini, B., & Revelli, R. (1989). The relationship between firms growth and labor demand. Small Business Economics, 1, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cope, J., & Watts, G. (2000). ‘Learning by doing. an exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 6, 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cross, M. (1981). New firm formation and regional development. London: Gower.Google Scholar
  40. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Introduction to Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 3–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.Google Scholar
  42. Feller, W. (1943). On a general class of contagious distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. 1 (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley Eastern.Google Scholar
  44. Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fichman, M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1991). Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 16, 442–468.Google Scholar
  46. Flajolet, P., Gabarró, J., & Pekari, H. (2005). Analytic urns. Annals of Probability, 33, 1200–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Forbes, D. P. (1999). Cognitive approaches to new venture creation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 415–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is an entrepreneur is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.Google Scholar
  49. Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 750–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gompers, P., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2007). Performance persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 62, 731–764.Google Scholar
  52. Greenwood, M., & Yule, G. U. (1920). An inquiry into the nature of frequency distributions representative of multiple happenings with particular reference to the occurrence of multiple attacks of disease or of repeated accidents. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 83, 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Griffin, D. W., & Varey, C. A. (1996). Towards a consensus on overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hamilton, B. H. (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 604–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Haunsperger, D. B., & Saari, D. G. (1981). The lack of consistency for statistical decision procedures. The American Statistician, 45, 252–255.Google Scholar
  57. Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Henderson, A. D. (1999). Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liability of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 281–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Holmes, T. J., & Schmitz, J. A., Jr. (1995). On the turnover of business firms and business managers. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 1005–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ijiri, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1975). Some distributions associated with Bose-Einstein statistics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72, 1654–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Irwin, J. O. (1941). Discussion on chambers and Yule’s paper. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 7, 101–107.Google Scholar
  62. Jain, G. C., & Consul, P. C. (1971). Generalized negative binomial distribution. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 21, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kane, T. (2010). The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. Kauffman Foundation Research Series: Firm Formation and Economic Growth.Google Scholar
  64. Kirchhoff, B. A. (1997). Entrepreneurship economics. In W. Bygrave (Ed.), The portable MBA in entrepreneurship (2nd ed., pp. 444–474). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  65. Klotz, J. (1973). Statistical inference in Bernoulli trails with dependence. The Annals of Statistics, 1, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kolvereid, L., & Bullvag, E. (1993). Novices versus experienced business founders: An exploratory investigation. In S. Birley, I. C. MacMillan, & S. Subramony (Eds.), Entrepreneurship research: Global perspectives (pp. 275–285). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  67. Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2009). Defending Gibrat’s law as a long-run regularity. Small Business Economics, 32, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14, 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. MacMillan, I. C. (1986). To really learn about entrepreneurship, let’s study habitual entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 241–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry and market contestability: An international comparison. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Mata, J. (1994). Firm growth during infancy. Small Business Economics, 6, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McGrath, R. G. (1996). Options and the entrepreneur: Towards a strategic theory of entrepreneurial wealth creation. Academy of Management Proceedings, Entrepreneurship division, 101–105.Google Scholar
  73. Miner, J. B. (1997). The expanded horizon for achieving entrepreneurial success. Organizational Dynamics, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Miner, J. B., & Raju, N. S. (2004). Risk propensity differences between managers and entrepreneurs and between low- and high-growth entrepreneurs: A reply in a more conservative vein. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Moskowitz, T. J., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2002). The returns to entrepreneurial investment: A private equity premium puzzle? American Economic Review, 92, 745–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2006). Firm growth and liquidity constraints: A dynamic analysis. Small Business Economics, 27, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Petrunia, R. (2008). Does Gibrat’s Law hold? evidence from Canadian retail and manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 30, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Phillips, B., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (1989). Formation, growth and survival; Small firm dynamics in the U.S. economy. Small Business Economics, 1, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Plehn-Dujowich, J. (2009). A theory of serial entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, doi: 10.1007/s11187-008-9171-5.
  81. Reid, G. C. (1995). Early life-cycle behaviour of micro-firms in Scotland. Small Business Economics, 7, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rerup, C. (2005). Learning from past experience: Footnotes on mindfulness and habitual entrepreneurship. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21, 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rodriguez, A. C., Molina, M. A., Perez, A. L. G., & Hernandez, U. M. (2003). Size, age and activity sector on the growth of the small and medium firm size. Small Business Economics, 21, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ronstadt, R. (1986). Exit, stage left: Why entrepreneurs end their entrepreneurial careers before retirement. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 323–338.Google Scholar
  85. Ross, G. & D. Preece. (1985). The negative binomial distribution. Statistician, 34, 323–335.Google Scholar
  86. Samuelson, P. A. (1967). General proof that diversification pays. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2000). Seminar on research perspectives in entrepreneurship (1997). Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.Google Scholar
  89. Sarasvathy, S. D., Simon, H., & Lave, L. B. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33(2), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schollhammer, H. (1991). Incidence and determinants of multiple entrepreneurship. In N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. G. Covin, D. L. Sexton, D. P. Slevin, K. H. Vesper, & W. E. Wetzel Jr. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 11–24). Wellesley: Babson College.Google Scholar
  91. Scott, M., & Rosa, P. (1996). Opinion: Has firm level analysis reached its limits? Time for rethink. International Small Business Journal, 14, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42, 425–440.Google Scholar
  93. Simon, H. A., & Bonini, C. P. (1958). The size distribution of business firms. American Economic Review, 58, 607–617.Google Scholar
  94. Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & Meijaard, J. (2008). Renascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(4), 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stangler, D. & Litan, R. E. (2009). Where will the jobs come from? Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedFiles/where_will_the_jobs_come_from.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2010.
  96. Starr, J., & Bygrave, W. (1991). The assets and liabilities of prior start-up experience: An exploratory study of multiple venture entrepreneurs. In N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. G. Covin, D. L. Sexton, D. P. Slevin, K. H. Vesper, & W. E. Wetzel Jr. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 213–227). Wellesley: Babson College.Google Scholar
  97. Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analysis review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Rand McNally: Chicago.Google Scholar
  99. Storey, D. (1989). Firm performance and size: Explanations from the small firm sectors. Small Business Economics, 1, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat’s legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 40–59.Google Scholar
  101. Taibleson, M. H. (1974). Distinguishing between contagion, heterogeneity and randomness in stochastic models. American Sociological Review, 39, 877–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Taylor, R. (1999). The small firm as a temporal coalition. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11, 1–19.Google Scholar
  103. Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Westhead, P. (2003). A longitudinal study of habitual entrepreneurs: Starters and acquirers. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(3), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Ucbasaran, D. (2004). Business ownership experience, entrepreneurial behavior and performance: Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Nottingham University Business School.Google Scholar
  105. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2006). Habitual entrepreneurs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  106. Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Westhead, P. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M. & Binks, M. (2009). The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. Journal of Business Venturing, doi:  10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.001.
  108. Van Gelderen, M., Van der Sluis, L., & Jansen, P. (2005a). Learning opportunities and learning behaviors of small business starters: Relations with goal achievement, skill development and satisfaction. Small Business Economics, 25, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Van Gelderen, M., Van der Sluis, L., & Jansen, P. (2005b). Learning opportunities and learning behaviors of small business starters: Relations with goal achievement, skill development and satisfaction. Small Business Economics, 25, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Vaupel, J. W., & Yashin, A. I. (1985). Heterogeneity’s ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. The American Statistician, 39, 176–185.Google Scholar
  111. Viveros, R., Balasubramanian, K., & Balakrishnan, N. (1994). Binomial and negative binomial analogues under correlated Bernoulli trials. The American Statistician, 48, 243–247.Google Scholar
  112. Wagner, J. (1992). Firm size, firm growth, and persistence of chance: Testing GIBRAT’s Law with establishment data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989. Small Business Economics, 4, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Weiss, C. R. (1998). Size, growth and survival in the upper Austrian farm sector. Small Business Economics, 10, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1998). Novice, serial and portfolio founders: Are they different? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Martin, F. (2003). Habitual entrepreneurs in Scotland: Characteristics, search processes, learning and performance. Glasgow: Scottish Enterprise.Google Scholar
  116. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2005). Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions. Small Business Economics, 25, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Woo, C. Y., Daellenbach, C, & Nicholls-Nixon, C. (1994). Theory building in the presence of randomness: the case of venture creation and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 31(4), 507–524.Google Scholar
  118. Wright, M., Robbie, K., & Ennew, C. (1997a). Serial entrepreneurs. British Journal of Management, 8(3), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wright, M., Robbie, K., & Ennew, C. (1997b). Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Xekalaki, E. (1983). The univariate generalized Waring distribution in relation to accident theory: proneness, spells or contagion? Biometrics, 39, 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Yang, C., & Huang, C. (2005). R&D, size and firm growth in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Small Business Economics, 25, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zhang, J. (2009). The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: evidence from serial entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9216-4.
  123. Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1265–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saras D. Sarasvathy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anil R. Menon
    • 1
  • Graciela Kuechle
    • 2
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Basque Institute of CompetitivenessUniversity of DeustoSan SebastiánSpain

Personalised recommendations