Small Business Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 899–910 | Cite as

Relationship banking and escalating commitments to bad loans

  • Eugene Kang
  • Asghar Zardkoohi
  • Ramona L. Paetzold
  • Donald Fraser


The relationship banking literature suggests that business relationships play an important role in the loan decisions of small banks. We test one aspect of this hypothesis using a cross-sectional panel dataset of small banks located in Texas from 1994 to 2002. Our results suggest that small banks located in smaller counties escalate their commitment to bad loans when compared with those located in larger counties, even after controlling for psychological and social factors that influence escalation tendencies. These results highlight the need for small banks to trade-off the positive benefits of adopting a relationship banking strategy against its unintended negative consequence. We provide some suggestions on how small banks may lessen their escalation tendencies despite adopting a relationship banking strategy. The results of this study also suggest that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that develop strong relational bonds with small banks may benefit from continued access to credit facilities, especially during periods when they experience financial distress.


Relationship banking Escalation of commitment Rural sociology County population 

JEL Classifications

C33 D82 G21 M10 L26 


  1. Agarwal, S., & Hauswald, R. (2010). Distance and private information in lending. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(7), 2757–2788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelini, P., Di Salvo, R., & Ferri, G. (1998). Availability and cost of credit for small businesses: Customer relationships and credit cooperatives. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 925–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baas, T., & Schrooten, M. (2006). Relationship banking and SMEs: A theoretical analysis. Small Business Economics, 27, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beggs, J. J., Haines, V. A., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1996). Revisiting the rural-urban contrast: Personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan settings. Rural Sociology, 61(2), 306–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger, A. N., Goldberg, L. G., & White, L. J. (2001). The effects of dynamic changes in bank competition on the supply of small business credit. European Finance Review, 5(1–2), 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, A. N., Miller, N. H., Petersen, M. A., Rajan, R. G., & Stein, J. C. (2005). Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. Journal of Business, 68(3), 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2002). Small business credit availability and relationship lending: The importance of bank organizational structure. The Economic Journal, 112, 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berlin, M., & Mester, L. J. (1992). Debt covenants and renegotiation. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2, 95–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacharya, S., & Chiesa, G. (1995). Proprietary information, financial intermediation, and research incentives. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 4, 328–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Binks, M. R., & Ennew, C. T. (1997). The relationship between U.K. banks and their small business customers. Small Business Economics, 9, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biyalogorsky, E., Boulding, W., & Staelin, R. (2006). Stuck in the past: Why managers persist with new product failures. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blackwell, D. W., & Winters, D. B. (1997). Banking relationships and the effect of monitoring on loan pricing. Journal of Financial Research, 20(2), 275–289.Google Scholar
  15. Blanchard, T. C. (2007). Conservative protestant congregations and racial residential segregation: Evaluating the closed community thesis in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties. American Sociological Review, 72(3), 416–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bodenhorn, H. (2003). Short-term loans and long-term relationships: Relationship lending in early America. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35(4), 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boot, A. (2000). Relationship banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boot, A., Greenbaum, S. I., & Thakor, A. V. (1993). Reputation and discretion in financial contracting. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1165–1183.Google Scholar
  19. Boot, A., & Thakor, A. V. (1994). Moral hazard and secured lending in an infinitely repeated credit market game. International Economic Review, 35(4), 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boot, A., & Thakor, A. V. (2000). Can relationship banking survive competition? The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 679–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brau, J. C. (2002). Do banks price owner-manager agency costs? An examination of small business borrowing. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(4), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3, 189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brockner, J. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 39–61.Google Scholar
  24. Brockner, J., Shaw, M. C., & Rubin, J. Z. (1979). Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: Quitting before it’s too late. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S., & Price, B. (2000). Regression analysis by example. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. Chiu, H.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., Li, Y.-C., & Lee, M. (2005). Relationship marketing and consumer switching behavior. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1681–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cole, R. A., Goldberg, L. G., & White, L. J. (2004). Cookie cutter vs. character: The micro structure of small business lending by large and small banks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 39(2), 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Colgate, M., & Lang, B. (2005). Positive and negative consequences of a relationship manager strategy: New Zealand banks and their small business customers. Journal of Business Research, 58, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. D’Auria, C., Foglia, A., & Reedtz, P. M. (1999). Bank interest rates and credit relationships in Italy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23, 1067–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Degryse, H., & Ongena, S. (2005). Distance, lending relationships, and competition. The Journal of Finance, 60, 231–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dewey, R. (1960). The rural-urban continuum: Real but relatively unimportant. The American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DeYoung, R., Glennon, D., & Nigro, P. (2008). Borrower–lender distance, credit scoring, and loan performance: Evidence from informational-opaque small business borrowers. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Edwards, J., & Fischer, K. (1994). Banks, finance and investment in Germany. Cambridge: Centre for Economic Policy Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elyasiani, E., & Goldberg, L. G. (2004). Relationship lending: A survey of the literature. Journal of Economics and Business, 56, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ennew, C. T., & Binks, M. R. (1999). Impact of participative service relationships on quality, satisfaction and retention: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 46, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ergungor, O. E. (2005). The profitability of bank-borrower relationships. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 14, 485–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Finkelstein, S., & Sanford, S. H. (2000). Learning from corporate mistakes: The rise and fall of Iridium. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28, 2025–2048.Google Scholar
  40. Gines, H.-C., & Pedro, M.-S. (2010). Relationship lending and SME financing in the continental European bank-based system. Small Business Economics, 34, 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harhoff, D., & Korting, T. (1998). Lending relationships in Germany—empirical evidence from survey data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 1317–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hayward, M. L. A., & Shimizu, K. (2006). De-commitment to losing strategic action: Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hernandez-Canovas, G., & Martinez-Solano, P. (2006). Banking relationships: Effects on debt terms for small Spanish firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., & Scharfstein, D. (1990). The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. James, C., & Smith, D. C. (2000). Are banks still special? New evidence in their role in the capital raising process. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48, 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kang, E., & Zardkoohi, A. (2005). Board leadership structure and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kelly, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lado, A. A., Dant, R. R., & Tekleab, A. G. (2008). Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: Evidence from the retail industry. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Longhofer, S. D., & Santos, J. A. C. (2000). The importance of bank seniority for relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McNamara, G., Moon, H., & Bromiley, P. (2002). Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization’s attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Messner, S. F., Baumer, E. P., & Rosenfeld, R. (2004). Dimensions of social capital and rates of criminal homicide. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 882–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Montealegre, R., & Keil, M. (2000). De-escalating information technology projects: Lessons from the Denver international airport. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 417–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  56. Peltoniemi, J. (2007). The benefits of relationship banking: Evidence from small business financing in Finland. Journal of Financial Services Research, 31, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995). The effect of credit market competition and lending relationships. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (2002). Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2533–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reddy, S. K., & Czepiel, J. A. (1999). Measuring and modeling the effects of long-term buyer–seller relationships in corporate financial services markets. Journal of Business Research, 46, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ricard, L., & Perrien, J. (1999). Explaining and evaluating the implementation of organizational relationship marketing in the banking industry: Clients’ perception. Journal of Business Research, 45, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Robinson, C. K. (1996). Bank mergers: Antitrust trends. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  64. Rosman, A. J., & Bedard, J. C. (1999). Lenders’ decision strategies and loan structure decisions. Journal of Business Research, 46, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ross, J., & Staw, B. M. (1993). Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 701–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruchala, L. V., Hill, J. W., & Dalton, D. (1996). Escalation and the diffusion of responsibility: A commercial lending experiment. Journal of Business Research, 37, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53(5), 766–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (2004). The role of relational trust in bank-small firm relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schoorman, D. F. (1988). Escalating bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participating in hiring decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scott, J. A. (2006). Loan officer turnover and credit availability for small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(4), 544–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scott, J. A., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (2003). Bank mergers and small firm financing. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35(6), 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sedgley, N., & Elmslie, B. (2011). Do we still need cities? Evidence on rates of innovation from count data models of metropolitan statistical area patents. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(1), 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Simmel, G. (1950). The Metropolis and mental life. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 409–424). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Simonson, I., & Staw, B. M. (1992). Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Song, F., & Thakor, A. V. (2007). Relationship banking, fragility, and the asset-liability matching problem. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(6), 2129–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577–587.Google Scholar
  78. Staw, B. M., Barsade, S. G., & Koput, K. W. (1997). Escalation at the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives’ recognition and write-off of problem loans. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1987). Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 39–78). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  80. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1989). Understanding behavior in escalating situations. Science, 246, 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tang, M.-J. (1988). An economic perspective on escalating commitment. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Texas Bankers Red Book. (1993–2002). Shawnee Mission, KS: BankNews.Google Scholar
  83. Tolbert, C. M., Irwin, M. D., Lyson, T. A., & Nucci, A. R. (2002). Civic community in small-town America: How civic welfare is influenced by local capitalism and civic engagement. Rural Sociology, 67(1), 90–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weber, M. (1921). The city. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  86. Welch, I. (1997). Why is bank debt senior? A theory of asymmetry and claim priority based on influence costs. The Review of Financial Studies, 10(4), 1203–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Whyte, G. (1986). Escalating commitment to a course of action: A reinterpretation. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 311–321.Google Scholar
  89. Whyte, G., Saks, A. M., & Hook, S. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  91. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Kang
    • 1
  • Asghar Zardkoohi
    • 2
  • Ramona L. Paetzold
    • 2
  • Donald Fraser
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Strategy, Management & Organization, Nanyang Business SchoolNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore Singapore
  2. 2.Department of ManagementTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Department of FinanceTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations