This study explores the relationship between new venture team composition and new venture persistence and performance over time. We examine the team characteristics of a 5-year panel study of 202 new venture teams and new venture performance. Our study makes two contributions. First, we extend earlier research concerning homophily theories of the prevalence of homogeneous teams. Using structural event analysis we demonstrate that team members’ start-up experience is important in this context. Second, we attempt to reconcile conflicting evidence concerning the influence of team homogeneity on performance by considering the element of time. We hypothesize that higher team homogeneity is positively related to short term outcomes, but is less effective in the longer term. Our results confirm a difference over time. We find that more homogeneous teams are less likely to be higher performing in the long term. However, we find no relationship between team homogeneity and short-term performance outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
By sex, we refer to biological sex.
Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aldrich, H. E., Carter, N. M., & Ruef, M. (2004). Teams. In W. B. Gartner, K. G. Shaver, N. M. Carter, & P. D. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: The process of business creation (pp. 299–310). Thousand Oakes: Sage.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148.
Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495–516.
Amason, A. S., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239–253.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–666.
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 107–124.
Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1), 3–24.
Bird, B. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. Lenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Brush, C. G., & Vanderwerf, P. A. (1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 157–170.
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
Carter, N., Gartner, W., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 151–166.
Carton, R. B., & Hofer, C. W. (2006). Measuring organizational performance: Metrics for entrepreneurship and strategic management research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459–484.
Cooper, A. C., & Gimeno-Gascon, F. J. (1992). Entrepreneurs, processes of founding and new firm performance. In D. Sexton & J. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art in entrepreneurship. Boston, MA: PWS Publishing Co.
Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1990). Positive effects of conflict: A field assessment. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 81–92.
Davidsson, P. (2006). Developments in the study of nascent entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1–76.
Davidsson, P., & Gordon, S. (2009). Nascent entrepreneurship research: A review. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4), 81–99.
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2006). Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization, 4(3), 215–247.
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amaosn, A. S. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365–386.
Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gersick, C. J. G., Bartunek, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Learning from academia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1026–1044.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organizations as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity in work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045.
Huber, V. L., Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). Judgment by heuristics: The effects of performance standards and rater characteristics on performance-related judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 149–169.
Jackson, S., Brett, J., Sessa, V., Cooper, D., Julin, J., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 675–689.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557.
Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., & Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 7–17.
Kim, P., & Aldrich, H. (2005). Social capital and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 55–104.
Klyver, K., & Terjesen, S. (2007). Gender differences in entrepreneurial networking: A process perspective. Women in Management Review, 22(8):682–688.
Lester, R. H., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2006). Initial public offering investor valuations: An examination of top management team prestige and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 1–26.
McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). More like each other than anyone else? A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial perception. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 417–429.
McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1986). Sex segregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 51, 61–79.
Meakin, V., & Snaith, B. (1997). Putting together a goal-scoring team. In S. Birley & D. F. Muzyka (Eds.), Mastering enterprise. London: Pitman.
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 441–452.
Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125–141.
Pelled, L. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–631.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.
Reynolds, P. D., Bygrave, W. D., & Autio, E. (2004a). Global Entrepreneruship Monitor 2003 Global Report. London: London Business School and Babson College.
Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004b). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23(4), 263–284.
Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (vol. 19, pp. 131–173). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ruef, M. (2002a). Strong ties, weak ties and islands: Structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 427–449.
Ruef, M. (2002b). A structural event approach to the analysis of group composition. Social Networks, 24, 135–160.
Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of organizational founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195–222.
Schrum, W., & Creek, J. N. A. (1987). Social structure during the school years: Onset of the degrouping process. American Sociological Review, 52, 218–223.
Shane, S., & Delmar, F. (2004). Planning for the market: Business planning before marketing and the continuation of organizing efforts. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 767–785.
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Jr., et al. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Talaulicar, T., Grundei, J., & von Werder, A. (2005). Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(4), 519–541.
Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1):55–63.
Timmons, J. A. (1990). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship in the 1990s. Boston: Irwin.
Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402–423.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2006). Habitual entrepreneurs. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. Shaw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 1). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Verbrugge, L. M. (1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56, 576–597.
Vesper, K. (1990). New venture strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 590–602.
Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27(2), 141–162.
Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1998). Novice, portfolio and serial founders: Are they different? Evidence from new production firm registrations 1980–1988. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 173–204.
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 60.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (1995). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 996–1002.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. I. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 20, pp. 182–203). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353–376.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Steffens, P., Terjesen, S. & Davidsson, P. Birds of a feather get lost together: new venture team composition and performance. Small Bus Econ 39, 727–743 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9358-z
- New venture teams
- Team homogeneity
- Team heterogeneity
- Team diversity
- New venture performance