Small Business Economics

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 45–56 | Cite as

Succession and firm growth: results from a non-parametric matching approach

  • Denise Sandra Diwisch
  • Peter Voithofer
  • Christoph R. Weiss
Article

Abstract

The article analyses the relationship between succession and firm performance. Applying a non-parametric matching approach on a panel of roughly 4,000 Austrian family firms we evaluate the impact of actual (past) succession as well as planned (future) successions on employment growth. Analysing succession plans, we do not find a significant difference in employment growth between firms that plan to transfer the firm in the next 10 years and those who do not. In contrast, past succession exerts a significant and positive employment growth effect, which becomes stronger over time.

Keywords

Succession Family firms Employment growth Matching Austria 

JEL Classification

C14 L25 L26 

References

  1. Almus, M. (2004). The shadow of death—an empirical analysis of the pre-exit performance of New German firms. Small Business Economics, 23, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronoff, C. E., Astrachan, J. H., & Ward, J. L. (1997). Family Business Sourcebook II. Marietta, GA: Business Owner Resources.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.Google Scholar
  5. Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D., (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance’, forthcoming in The Quarterly Journal of Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2003). Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm. Coleman Foundation White Paper Series.Google Scholar
  8. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cucculelli, M., & Micucci, G. (2006). Entrepreneurship, inherited control and firm performance in Italian SMEs. Working Paper No. 258, Department of Economics, Universita’ Politecnica delle Marche.Google Scholar
  10. Foxall, G. R. (1983). Consumer choice. New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gersick, K., Davis, J., McCollom H., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Glauben, T., Tietje, H., & Weiss, C. R. (2004). Intergenerational succession on farm households: Evidence from Upper-Austria. Review of Economics of the Household, 2(4), 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griliches, Z., & Regev, H. (1995). Firm productivity in Israeli industry 1979–1988. Journal of Econometrics, 65, 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handler, W. C. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7(2), 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckman, J. J., LaLonde, R. J., & Smith, J. A. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics 3a (pp. 1865–2097). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Hujer, R., Maurer, K. O., & Wellner, M. (1997). The impact of training on unemployment duration in West Germany. Discussion Paper 74, Department of Economics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  18. Kimhi, A. (1994). Optimal timing of farm transferal from parent to child. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimhi, A., Kislev, Y., & Arbel, S. (1995). Intergenerational succession on Israeli family farms, preliminary evidence from panel data, 1971–1988. Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University.Google Scholar
  20. Mandl, I. (2004). Business transfers and successions in Austria. Paper presented at the EISB conference, Turku, 10th September.Google Scholar
  21. Mandl, I., & Voithofer, P. (2005). Situation und Trends der Unternehmensnachfolge in Österreich. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 2, 316–327.Google Scholar
  22. McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson, G. V., & Mishra, C. S. (1998). Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics, 7, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morck, R. K., Strangeland, D. A., & Yeung, B. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease? In Morck (Ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership. Chicago.Google Scholar
  24. Neuberg, F., & Lank, A. G. (1998). The family business: Its governance for sustainability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Pérez-González, F. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, B. F., & Amoako-Adu, B. (1999). Management succession and financial performance of family controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (2005). Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125, 305–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2007). Performance and behaviour of family firms: Evidence from the French Stock Market. Journal of the European & Economic Association, 5(4), 709–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steier, L. (2001). Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An explanatory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14(3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stiglbauer, A., & Weiss, C. R. (2000). Family and non−family succession in the Upper−Austrian farm sector. Cahiers d’économie et sociologie rurales, 54, 5–26.Google Scholar
  33. Väre, M., Weiss, C. R., & Pietola, K. (2005). On the intention-behaviour discrepancy: Empirical evidence from successions on farms in Finland. SFB Discussion Paper no. 3, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  34. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Wasserman, N. (2003). Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14(2), 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weiss, C. R. (1999). Farm growth and survival: Econometric evidence for individual farms in Upper Austria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise Sandra Diwisch
    • 1
  • Peter Voithofer
    • 2
  • Christoph R. Weiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsVienna University of Economics and Business AdministrationViennaAustria
  2. 2.Austrian Institute for SME ResearchViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations