Skip to main content
Log in

Leverage and Corporate Performance: Does Institutional Environment Matter?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to provide new empirical evidence on a major corporate governance issue: the relationship between leverage and corporate performance. We propose two major findings to this literature by applying frontier efficiency techniques to measure performance of medium-sized firms from seven European countries. A maximum likelihood procedure is used to estimate a stochastic cost frontier and the parameters of an equation relating cost inefficiency to leverage simultaneously. We find that the relationship between leverage and corporate performance varies across countries, which tends to support the influence of institutional factors on this link. We then suggest the influence of the efficiency of the legal system and in a lesser degree of the access to bank credit on the relationship between leverage and corporate performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner D., C. A .K. Lovell, P. Schmidt, 1977, Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese G., T. Coelli, 1995, A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data, Empirical Economics, 20, (2), 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger A., D. Humphrey, 1997, Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley D., E. Kuh, R. Welsch, 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A., W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, 1978, Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operations Research 6, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittenden F., Hall G., Hutchinson P., 1996, Small Firm Growth, Access to Capital Markets and Financial Structure: Review of Issues and an Empirical Investigation, Small Business Economics, 8(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T., 1996, ‚A Guide To FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Production and Cost Function Estimation’, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Working Paper 96/07.

  • Corbett, J. and T. Jenkinson, 1994, ‚The Financing of Industry, 1970–89: An International Comparison’, CEPR Discussion Paper 948.

  • Demirgüc-Kunt, A. and R. Levine, 2000, ‚Bank-Based and Market-Based Financial Systems: Cross-Country Comparisons’, World Bank Working Paper 2143.

  • Grossman S., Hart O., 1982, Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives, in: J. McCall, (ed.) The Economics of Information and Uncertainty Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M., 1986, Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 76, 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M., Meckling W., 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 76, 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S., 1997, An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Corporate Debt Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32(1), 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow J., C. A. K. Lovell, I. Materov, P. Schmidt, 1982, On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model, Journal of Econometrics 19, 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, M. and J. Newman, 1999, ‚Debt Level and Corporate performance: An Empirical Analysis’, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute, April 6–10, 1999, Mexico: Puerto Vallarta.

  • Kumbhakar, S. and C. A. K. Lovell, 2000, Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge University Press.

  • La Porta R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, 1997, Legal Determinants of External Finance, Journal of Finance LII, (3), 1131–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, 1998, Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland H., Pyle D., 1977, Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure and Financial Intermediation, Journal of Finance 32, 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell C. A. K., 1993, Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency, in: H. Fried, C. A .K. Lovell, P. Schmidt, (eds.) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, London: Oxford University Press, 3–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar S., P. Chhibber, 1999, Capital Structure and Performance: Evidence from a Transition Economy on an Aspect of Corporate Governance, Public Choice 98, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelas N., F. Chittenden, P. Poutziouris, 1999, Financial Policy and Capital Structure Choice in U.K. SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Company Panel Data, Small Business Economics 12, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F., M. Miller, 1958, The Costs of Capital, Corporate Finance, and the Theory of Investment, American Economic Review 48, 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers S., 1977, Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics 5, 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell S., D. Nicolitsas, N. Dryden, 1997, What Makes Firms Perform Well ?, European Economic Review 41, 783–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell S., D. Nicolitsas, 1999, How Does Financial Pressure Affect Firms?, European Economic Review 43, 1435–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pushner G., 1995, Equity Ownership Structure, Leverage and Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Japan, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 3, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan R., L. Zingales, 1995, What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data, Journal of Finance 50, 1421–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S., 1977, The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive Signalling Approach, Bell Journal of Economics 8, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J., A. Weiss, 1981, Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information, American Economic Review 71(3), 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wijst N., R. Thurik, 1993, Determinants of Small Firm Debt Ratios: An Analysis of Retail Panel Data, Small Business Economics 5, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H., P. Schmidt, 2002, One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Weill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weill, L. Leverage and Corporate Performance: Does Institutional Environment Matter?. Small Bus Econ 30, 251–265 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9045-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9045-7

Key words

JEL Classifications

Navigation