Abstract
This work explores and compares some basic properties of corporate growth process at both aggregate manufacturing level and disaggregated sectoral levels. Using an extensive dataset on Italian manufacturing firms, we investigate which properties of firm growth dynamics are robust under disaggregation. We compare the results obtained with three different definitions of firm size, namely total sales, number of employees and value added. Our analysis suggests that while different sectors are characterized by significant differences in firm size distributions, in the degrees of concentration and in the autoregressive structure of the growth processes, there are also regularities which hold across all of them, such as the approximate unit root nature of the growth process and the power exponential shape of the growth rates density. Together, these “stylized facts” suggest challenging puzzles on the drivers of corporate growth and the resulting industrial structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Audretsch D., Santarelli E. and Vivarelli M. (1999). ‘Start-up Size and Industrial Dynamics: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing’. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17: 965–983
Axtell R. L. (2001). ‘Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes’. Science 293: 1818–1820
Bain J. S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Bartelsman E. J., Haltiwanger J. and Scarpetta S. (2004). ‘Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries’. Tinbergen Institute, W.P. 04–114/3: 1–49
Bottazzi G., Dosi G., Lippi M., Pammolli F. and Riccaboni M. (2001). ‘Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry’. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19: 1161–1187
Bottazzi G., Cefis E. and Dosi G. (2002). ‘Corporate Growth and Industrial Structure Some Evidence from the Italian Manufacturing Industry’. Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 705–723
Bottazzi G. and Secchi A. (2003). ‘Common Properties and Sectoral Specificities in the Dynamics of U.S. Manufacturing Companies’. Review of Industrial Organization 23: 217–232
Bottazzi G. and Secchi A. (2005). ‘Growth and Diversification Patterns of the worldwide Pharmaceutical Industry’. Review of industrial Organization 26: 195–216
Bottazzi, G. and A. Secchi, 2006, Explaining the Distribution of Firms Growth Rates, The RAND Journal of Economics, forthcoming 37, 234–263
Cabral L. M. B. and Mata J. (2003). ‘On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory’. American Economic Review 93: 1075–1090
Cefis E., Ciccarelli M. and Orsenigo L. (2002). From Gibrat’s Legacy to Gibrat’s Fallacy A Bayesian approach to study the growth of firms WP-AD 2002–19, IVIE. Universitat de Alicante, Alicante
Chesher A. (1979). ‘Testing the Law of Proportionate Effects’. Journal of Industrial Economics 27: 403–411
Dosi G., Marsili O., Orsenigo L. and Salvatore R. (1995). ‘Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of industrial Structures’. Small Business Economics 7: 411–436
Dunne T., Roberts M. J. and Samuelson L. (1988). ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 671–698
Dunne T. and Hughes A. (1994). ‘Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s’. Journal of Industrial Economics 42: 115–139
Evans DS. (1987). ‘The Relationship between Firm growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 567–581
Gibrat R. (1931). Les inégalités économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris
Hall B. H. (1987). ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector’. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 583–606
Hall P. and York M. (2001). ‘On the Calibration of Silverman’s Test for Multimodality’. Statistica Sinica 11: 515–536
Hart P. E. and Prais S. J. (1956). ‘The Analysis of Business Concentration’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 119: 150–191
Heshmati A. (2001). ‘On the Growth of Micro and Small Firms: Evidence from Sweden’. Small Business Economics 17: 213–228
Hymer S. and Pashigian P. (1962). ‘Firm Size and Rate of Growth’. Journal of Political Economy 70: 556–569
Huber P. J. (1967). ‘The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions’. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability I: 221–233
Ijiri Y. and Simon H. A. (1977). Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms. North Holland Publishing Company, New York
Kumar M. S. (1985). ‘Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size: Evidence from the United Kingdom’. Journal of Industrial Economics 33: 327–338
Kleiber C. and Kotz S. (2003). Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey
Lotti F., Santarelli E. and Vivarelli M. (2003). ‘Does Gibrat’s Law hold among young, small firms?’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13: 213–235
Mansfield E. (1962). ‘Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation and the growth of firms’. American Economic Review 52: 1023–1051
Marsili O. (2001). The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenhem
Pavitt K. (1984). ‘Sectoral Patterns of technical Change: towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’. Research Policy 13: 343–373
Quandt R. E. (1966). ‘On the Size Distribution of Firms’. American Economic Review 56: 416–432
Silverman B. W. (1981). ‘Using Kernel Density Estimates to Investigate Multimodality’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 43: 97–99
Silverman B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London
Simon H. A. and Bonini C. P. (1958). ‘The Size Distribution of Business Firms’. American Economic Review 48: 607–617
Stanley M. H. R., Buldyrev S. V., Havlin S., Mantegna R., Salinger M. A. and Stanley H. E. (1995). ‘Zipf plots and the size distribution of firms’. Economic Letters 49: 453–457
Steindl J. (1965). Random Processes and the Growth of Firms. Griffin, London
Subbotin M. T. (1923). ‘On the Law of Frequency of Errors’. Matematicheskii Sbornik 31: 296–301
Sutton J. (1997). ‘Gibrat’s Legacy’. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 40–59
Wagner J. (1992). ‘Firm Size, Firm Growth and Persistence of chance: Testing Gibrat’s Law with establishment Data from Lower Saxony’. Small Business Economics 4: 125–131
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G. et al. Invariances and Diversities in the Patterns of Industrial Evolution: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Industries. Small Bus Econ 29, 137–159 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0014-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0014-y