Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invariances and Diversities in the Patterns of Industrial Evolution: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Industries

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work explores and compares some basic properties of corporate growth process at both aggregate manufacturing level and disaggregated sectoral levels. Using an extensive dataset on Italian manufacturing firms, we investigate which properties of firm growth dynamics are robust under disaggregation. We compare the results obtained with three different definitions of firm size, namely total sales, number of employees and value added. Our analysis suggests that while different sectors are characterized by significant differences in firm size distributions, in the degrees of concentration and in the autoregressive structure of the growth processes, there are also regularities which hold across all of them, such as the approximate unit root nature of the growth process and the power exponential shape of the growth rates density. Together, these “stylized facts” suggest challenging puzzles on the drivers of corporate growth and the resulting industrial structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audretsch D., Santarelli E. and Vivarelli M. (1999). ‘Start-up Size and Industrial Dynamics: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing’. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17: 965–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell R. L. (2001). ‘Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes’. Science 293: 1818–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain J. S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman E. J., Haltiwanger J. and Scarpetta S. (2004). ‘Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries’. Tinbergen Institute, W.P. 04–114/3: 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi G., Dosi G., Lippi M., Pammolli F. and Riccaboni M. (2001). ‘Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry’. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19: 1161–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi G., Cefis E. and Dosi G. (2002). ‘Corporate Growth and Industrial Structure Some Evidence from the Italian Manufacturing Industry’. Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 705–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi G. and Secchi A. (2003). ‘Common Properties and Sectoral Specificities in the Dynamics of U.S. Manufacturing Companies’. Review of Industrial Organization 23: 217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi G. and Secchi A. (2005). ‘Growth and Diversification Patterns of the worldwide Pharmaceutical Industry’. Review of industrial Organization 26: 195–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi, G. and A. Secchi, 2006, Explaining the Distribution of Firms Growth Rates, The RAND Journal of Economics, forthcoming 37, 234–263

  • Cabral L. M. B. and Mata J. (2003). ‘On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory’. American Economic Review 93: 1075–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cefis E., Ciccarelli M. and Orsenigo L. (2002). From Gibrat’s Legacy to Gibrat’s Fallacy A Bayesian approach to study the growth of firms WP-AD 2002–19, IVIE. Universitat de Alicante, Alicante

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesher A. (1979). ‘Testing the Law of Proportionate Effects’. Journal of Industrial Economics 27: 403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G., Marsili O., Orsenigo L. and Salvatore R. (1995). ‘Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of industrial Structures’. Small Business Economics 7: 411–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T., Roberts M. J. and Samuelson L. (1988). ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 671–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T. and Hughes A. (1994). ‘Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s’. Journal of Industrial Economics 42: 115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS. (1987). ‘The Relationship between Firm growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 567–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat R. (1931). Les inégalités économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall B. H. (1987). ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector’. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 583–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P. and York M. (2001). ‘On the Calibration of Silverman’s Test for Multimodality’. Statistica Sinica 11: 515–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart P. E. and Prais S. J. (1956). ‘The Analysis of Business Concentration’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 119: 150–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati A. (2001). ‘On the Growth of Micro and Small Firms: Evidence from Sweden’. Small Business Economics 17: 213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer S. and Pashigian P. (1962). ‘Firm Size and Rate of Growth’. Journal of Political Economy 70: 556–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber P. J. (1967). ‘The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions’. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability I: 221–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri Y. and Simon H. A. (1977). Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms. North Holland Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M. S. (1985). ‘Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size: Evidence from the United Kingdom’. Journal of Industrial Economics 33: 327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber C. and Kotz S. (2003). Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotti F., Santarelli E. and Vivarelli M. (2003). ‘Does Gibrat’s Law hold among young, small firms?’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13: 213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. (1962). ‘Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation and the growth of firms’. American Economic Review 52: 1023–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsili O. (2001). The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenhem

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K. (1984). ‘Sectoral Patterns of technical Change: towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’. Research Policy 13: 343–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt R. E. (1966). ‘On the Size Distribution of Firms’. American Economic Review 56: 416–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman B. W. (1981). ‘Using Kernel Density Estimates to Investigate Multimodality’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 43: 97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. and Bonini C. P. (1958). ‘The Size Distribution of Business Firms’. American Economic Review 48: 607–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley M. H. R., Buldyrev S. V., Havlin S., Mantegna R., Salinger M. A. and Stanley H. E. (1995). ‘Zipf plots and the size distribution of firms’. Economic Letters 49: 453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steindl J. (1965). Random Processes and the Growth of Firms. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbotin M. T. (1923). ‘On the Law of Frequency of Errors’. Matematicheskii Sbornik 31: 296–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J. (1997). ‘Gibrat’s Legacy’. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 40–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J. (1992). ‘Firm Size, Firm Growth and Persistence of chance: Testing Gibrat’s Law with establishment Data from Lower Saxony’. Small Business Economics 4: 125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Bottazzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G. et al. Invariances and Diversities in the Patterns of Industrial Evolution: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Industries. Small Bus Econ 29, 137–159 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0014-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0014-y

Keywords

Jel Codes

Navigation