Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SME Policy, Financial Structure and Firm Growth: Evidence From Japan

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of public policy and financial structure on the growth of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Using a panel data set on SMEs in the Japanese manufacturing industry, we examine whether or not the SME Creative Business Promotion Law (CBPL) and financial structure affect firm growth. It is found that SMEs approved by prefectural governors under this law tend to increase assets. Further, we provide evidence that the CBPL and cash flow have an impact on the growth of younger SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs Z. J. and Audretsch D. B. (1990). Innovation and Small Firms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), 1993, Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

  • Audretsch D. B. and Elston J. A. (2002). Does Firm Size Matter? Evidence on the Impact of Liquidity Constraints on Firm Investment Behavior in Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. B., Link A. N. and Scott J. T. (2002). Public/Private Technology Partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-Supported Research. Research Policy 31: 145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. B., Santarelli E. and Vivarelli M. (1999). Start-Up Size and Industrial Dynamics: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17: 965–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti L. and Trovato G. (2002). The Determinants of Growth for Small and Medium Sized Firms. The Role of the Availability of External Finance. Small Business Economics 19: 291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond S. and Meghir C. (1994). Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm’s Financial Policy. Review of Economic Studies 61: 197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter R. E. and Petersen B. C. (2002). Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance?. Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 298–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittenden F., Hall G. and Hutchinson P. (1996). Small Firm Growth, Access to Capital Markets and Financial Structure: Review of Issues and an Empirical Investigation. Small Business Economics 8: 59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T., Roberts M. J. and Samuelson L. (1989). The Growth and Failure of U. S. Manufacturing Plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 671–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elston, J. A., 2002, ‘An Examination of the Relationship between Firm Size, Growth and Liquidity in the Neuer Market’, Discussion Paper, Economic Research Center of the Deutsche Bundesbank, 15/02

  • Eshima Y. (2003). Impact of Public Policy on Innovative SMEs in Japan. Journal of Small Business Management 41: 85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans D. S. (1987a). Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth. Journal of Political Economy 95: 657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans D. S. (1987b). The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 567–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari S. M., Hubbard R. G. and Petersen B. C. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 141–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall B. H. (1987). The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 583–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harada, N. and Y. Honjo, 2005, ‘Does the Creative Business Promotion Law Enhance SMEs’ Capital Investments? Evidence from a Panel Dataset of Unlisted SMEs in Japan’, Japan and the World Economy, forthcoming

  • Harhoff D., Stahl K. and Woywode M. (1998). Legal Form, Growth and Exit of West German Firms – Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries. Journal of Industrial Economics 46: 453–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J. J. (1976). The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic Social Measurement 5: 475–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J. J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47: 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati A. (2001). On the Growth of Micro and Small Firms: Evidence from Sweden. Small Business Economics 17: 213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honjo Y. (2004). Growth of New Start-Up Firms: Evidence from the Japanese Manufacturing Industry. Applied Economics 34: 343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard R. G. (1998). Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 193–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic B. (1982). Selection and Evolution of Industry. Econometrica 50: 649–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang L., Ofek E. and Stulz R. M. (1996). Leverage, Investment, and Firm Growth. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung S. F. and Yu S. (1996). On the Choice between Sample Selection and Two-part Models. Journal of Econometrics 72: 197–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J., Tsou M. and Hammitt J. K. (1999). Do Small Plants Grow Faster? Evidence from the Taiwan Electronics Industry. Economic Letters 65: 121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveman G. and Sengenberger W. (1991). The Re-emergence of Small-scale Production: An International Comparison. Small Business Economics 3: 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer L. H. (1998). The Present and Future Roles of Banks in Small Business Finance. Journal of Banking and Finance 22: 1109–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen M. A. and Rajan R. G. (1994). The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data. Journal of Finance 49: 3–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhani P. A. (2000). The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique. Journal of Economic Surveys 14: 53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry 2002, ‘A Survey on the Development of Policy Evaluation Method Regarding the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises (Chushokigyou no Performance ni kakaru Seisaku Hyoukashuhou no Kaihatsu ni kansuru Chousahoukoku)’ Report (Houkokusho). Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry

  • (2002). The 2002 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan. Japan Small Business Research Institute, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J. and Weiss A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. American Economic Review 71: 393–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey D. J. (1994). Understanding the Small Business Sector. Thomson Learning, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J. (1997). Gibrat’s Legacy. Journal of Economic Literature 25: 211–229

    Google Scholar 

  • White H. (1980). A Heteroscedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda T. (2004). Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing. Small Business Economics 24: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Honjo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Honjo, Y., Harada, N. SME Policy, Financial Structure and Firm Growth: Evidence From Japan. Small Bus Econ 27, 289–300 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-6703-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-6703-0

Keywords

Navigation