Organizational Structure and Performance in Dutch small Firms

Abstract

The relationship between organizational structure and performance in small firms has received relatively limited attention over the last few decades. In understanding small firm performance this seems to be a serious omission. In this paper, we first present the rationale for including organizational structure in the analysis of small firm performance. Then, from the literature on organizational theory, we retrieve several dimensions that may be postulated to describe organizational structures of small firms. Based on the study of a stratified sample of 1411 Dutch small firms we show that nine structure stereotypes can be delineated. We further investigate the relevance of the empirical taxonomy by looking at the relationship with firm performance in terms of sales growth, profitability and innovativeness. Eventually, we conclude that organizational structure indeed matters and that it deserves to be taken into account in models and future analysis of small firm performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. P. Aghion J. Tirole (1997) ArticleTitle‘Formal and Real Authority in Organizations’ Journal of Political Economy 105 1–29 Occurrence Handle10.1086/262063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Alchian H. Demsetz (1972) ArticleTitle‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’ American Economic Review 62 777–795

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. J. Arrow (1974) The Limits of Organization Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Athey J. Roberts (2001) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Design: Decision Rights and Incentive Contracts’. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 91 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. B. Audretsch (2001) ArticleTitle‘Research Issues Relating to Structure, Competition, and Performance of Small Technology-Based Firms’ Small Business Economics 16 IssueID1 37–51 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011124607332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. R. Axley (1992) ArticleTitle‘Delegate: Why We Should, Why We Don’t and How We Can’ Industrial Management 24 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. J. Ayers (2001) ArticleTitle‘Integration and New Product Development Success: The Role of Formal and Informal Controls’ The Journal of Applied Business Research 17 IssueID2 133–148

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. S. Becker K. M. Murphy (1992) ArticleTitle‘The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 1137–1160

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. M. Blau R. A. Schoenherr (1971) The Structure of Organzations Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Burns G. M. Stalker (1961) Management of Innovation Tavistock London

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. M. Burton B. Obel (1998) Strategic organizational diagnosis and design EditionNumber2 Kluwer Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. A. Calvo S. Wellisz (1978) ArticleTitleSupervision, Loss of Control, and the Optimum Size of the Firm’ Journal of Political Economy 86 943–952 Occurrence Handle10.1086/260719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Carson S. Cromie P. McGowan J. Hill (1995) Marketing and Entrepreneurship in SMEs Prentice Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Caruana M. H. Morris M. J. Vella (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Centralization and Formalization on Entrepreneurship in Export Firms Journal of Small Business Management 36 IssueID1 16–29

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. D. Chandler (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. I.. Chaston (1997) ArticleTitle‘Small Firm performance: Assessing the Interaction between Entrepreneurial Style and Organizational Structure European Journal of Marketing 31 IssueID11 814–834 Occurrence Handle10.1108/03090569710190550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Child (1972) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Structure and Strategies of Control: Replication of the Aston study’ Administrative Science Quarterly 17 163–177

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Child (1976) Managerial and Organizational Factors Associated with Company Performance D. S. Pugh C. R. Hinings (Eds) Organizational Structure; Extensions and Replications Saxon House Farnborough, Hants

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Child R. Mansfield (1972) ArticleTitle‘Technology, Size and Organization Structure’ Sociology 6 369–393 Occurrence Handle10.1177/003803857200600304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Cremer (1980) ArticleTitle‘A Partial Theory of the Optimal Organization of a Bureaucracy’ The Bell Journal of Economics 11 IssueID2 683–693

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. G. Dess R. B. Robinson (1984) ArticleTitleMeasuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-Held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit’ Strategic Management Journal 5 265–273

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. D. Dewar D. A. Whetten D. Boje (1980) ArticleTitle‘An Examination of the Reliability and Validity of the Aiken and Hage Scales of Centralization, Formalization, and Task Routineness’ Administrative Science Quarlerly 25 120–128

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Donaldson (1987) ArticleTitleStrategy and Structural Adjustment to Regain fit and Performance: In Defence of Contingency Theory Journal of Management Studies 24 IssueID1 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. H. Doty W. H. Glick G. P. Huber (1993) ArticleTitle‘Fit, Equifinality and Organizational Effectiveness, A Test of Two Configurational Theories Academy of Management Journal 36 1196–1250

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Galbraith (1973) Designing Complex Organizations Addison-Wesley Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Garicano (2000) ArticleTitle‘Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production’ Journal of Political Economy 108 874–904 Occurrence Handle10.1086/317671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Garicano T. N. Hubbard (2003) Specialization and Organization in Legal Services: Evidence From Market-Level Data University of Chicago Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  28. Geeraerts (1984) ArticleTitleThe Effect of Ownership on the Organization Structure in Small Firms Administrative Science Quarterly 29 232–237

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Harris A. Raviv (2002) ArticleTitle‘Organization Design’ Management Science 48 IssueID7 852–865 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.7.852.2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hart, O. and J. Moore, 1999, ‘On the Design of Hierarchies: Coordination Versus Specialization’, NBER Working Paper, 7388.

  31. J. Heskel (1999) ArticleTitle‘Small Firms, Contracting-out, Computers and Wage Inequality: Evidence from UK Manufacturing’ Economica 66 IssueID261 1–21 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0335.00153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. C. Jensen W. H. Meckling (1992) Specific and General Knowledge, and Organizational Structure L. Werin H. Wijkander (Eds) Contract Economics Blackwell Publishers Oxford 251–274

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. A. Johnston (2000) ArticleTitle‘Delegation and Organizational Structure in Small Businesses’ Group and Organization Management 25 IssueID1 4–21

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. R. Kimberly (1976) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique and Proposal’ Administrative Science Quarterly 21 IssueID4 271–297

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. Kimura (2002) ArticleTitle‘Subcontracting and the Performance of Small and Medium Firms in Japan’ Small Business Economics 18 IssueID3 163–175 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015187507379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. P. R. Lawrence J. W. Lorsch (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration Harvard University Press Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Lenox (2002) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Design, Information Transfer, and the Acquisition of Rent-Producing Resources’ Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 8 IssueID2 113–131 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016039916673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Levy P. Powell (1998) ArticleTitleSME Flexibility and the Role of Information Systems Small Business Economics 11 IssueID2 183–196 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007912714741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. X. Lin R. Germain (2003) ArticleTitleOrganizational Structure, Context, Customer Orientation, and Performance: Lessons from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises Strategic Management Journal 24 1131–1151 Occurrence Handle10.1002/smj.348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. G. MacDonald L. M. Marx (2001) ArticleTitleAdverse Specialization Journal of Political Economy 109 864–899 Occurrence Handle10.1086/322084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J. G. March H. A. Simon (1958) Organizations Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. T. Marschak R. Radner (1972) Economic Theory of Teams Yale University Press New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. Maskin Y. Qian C. Xu (2000) ArticleTitle‘Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form’ Review of Economic Studies 67 IssueID2 359–378 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-937X.00135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Meijaard, J. and L. M. Uhlaner, 2002, ‘The Innovativeness of Family And non-family firms’, Research Report, H200212, EIM: Zoetermeer.

  45. D. Miller P. H. Friesen (1980) ArticleTitle‘Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation’ Academy of Management Journal 23 IssueID4 591–614

    Google Scholar 

  46. D. Miller P. H. Friesen (1986) ArticleTitle‘Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis’ Strategic Management Journal 7 IssueID3 233–249

    Google Scholar 

  47. D. Miller J. M. Toulouse (1986) ArticleTitle‘Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy and Structure in Small Firms’ Management Science 32 IssueID11 1389–1409

    Google Scholar 

  48. R. E. Miles C. C. Snow (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. H. Mintzberg (1979) The Structuring of Organizations Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  50. H. Mintzberg (1983) Structures in Five: Designing Effective Organizations Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. D. Moreno-Luzón F. J. Peris (1998) ArticleTitle‘Strategic Approaches, Organizational Design and Quality Management: Integration in a Fit and Contingency Model International Journal of Quality Science 3 IssueID4 328–347 Occurrence Handle10.1108/13598539810243667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. A. Morrison K. Roth (1993) ArticleTitle‘Relating Porter’s Configuration-Coordination Framework to Competitive Strategy and Structural Mechanisms: Analysis and Implications Journal of Management 19 IssueID4 797–818 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0149-2063(93)90028-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. S. J. Nickell (1996) ArticleTitle‘Competition and Corporate Performance’ Journal of Political Economy 104 IssueID4 724–746 Occurrence Handle10.1086/262040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. S. Nickell D. Nicolitsas N. Dryden (1997) ArticleTitle‘What Makes Firms Perform Well’? European Economic Review 41 IssueID3 783–796 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00037-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. B. Nooteboom (1994) ArticleTitle‘Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theory and Evidence’ Small Business Economics 6 327–347 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01065137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. G. R. Oldham J. R. Hackman (1981) ArticleTitleRelationships between Organizational Structure and Employee Reactions: Comparing Alternative Frameworks Administrative Science Quarterly 26 66–83

    Google Scholar 

  57. C. Perrow (1970) Organizational Analysis Tavistock London

    Google Scholar 

  58. M. E. Porter (1985) Competitive Advantage Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  59. D. S. Pugh D. J. Hickson C. R. Hinnings C. Turner (1968) ArticleTitle‘Dimensions of Organizational Structure’ Administrative Science Quarterly 13 65–105

    Google Scholar 

  60. D. S. Pugh D. J. Hickson C. R. Hinnings C. Turner (1969) ArticleTitle‘The Context of Organization Structures’ Administrative Science Quarterly 14 91–114

    Google Scholar 

  61. D. S. Pugh Hickson (1976) Organizational Structure in its Context Saxon House Farnborough Hants

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. B. Quinn H. Mintzberg R. M. James (1988) The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, and Cases Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  63. H. A. Richardson R. J. Vandenberg T. C. Blum P. M. Roman (2002) ArticleTitle‘Does Decentralization Make a Difference for the Organization?’ Journal of Management 28 217–244 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00134-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. J. W. Rivkin N. Siggelkow (2003) ArticleTitle‘Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies among Elements of Organizational Design’ Management Science 49 IssueID3 290–311 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. S. P. Robbins (1990) Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Applications EditionNumber3 Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  66. P. J. A. Robson R. J. Bennett (2000) ArticleTitleSME Growth: The Relationship with Business Advice and External Collaboration Small Business Economics 15 IssueID3 193–208 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008129012953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. S. Roper (1999) ArticleTitle‘Modelling Small Business Growth and Profitability’ Small Business Economics 13 IssueID3 235–252 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008104624560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. R. K. Sah J. E. Stiglitz (1986) ArticleTitleThe Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies American Economic Review 76 IssueID4 716–727

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. C. Stein (2002) ArticleTitle‘Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized versus Hierarchical Firms’ Journal of Finance 57 IssueID5 1891–1908 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0022-1082.00483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. O. E. Williamson (1967) ArticleTitle‘Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size’ Journal of Political Economy 76 123–138

    Google Scholar 

  71. O. E. Williamson (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  72. J. Wolf W. G. Egelhoff (2002) ArticleTitleA Re-examination and Extension of International Strategy-Structure Theory Strategic Management Journal 23 IssueID2 181–189 Occurrence Handle10.1002/smj.210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Woodward (1965) Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  74. R. C. Young A. Francis (1993) ArticleTitleInnovation, High-Technology use, and Flexibility in Small Manufacturing Firms Growth and Change 24 IssueID1 67–83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joris Meijaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meijaard, J., Brand, M.J. & Mosselman, M. Organizational Structure and Performance in Dutch small Firms. Small Bus Econ 25, 83–96 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-4259-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • innovativeness
  • organizational structure
  • small firm performance

Jel Code

  • M21
  • D21