Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data

Abstract

Studies on the impact of technological innovation on growth have been largely mute on the role of␣new firm formation. Using cross-sectional data on the 37 countries participating in GEM 2002, this paper uses an augmented Cobb–Douglas production to explore firm formation and technological innovation as separate determinants of growth. One area of interest is the contrast between different types of entrepreneurial activities as measured using GEM Total Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) rates – high growth potential TEA, necessity TEA, opportunity TEA and overall TEA. Of the four types of entrepreneurship, only high growth potential entrepreneurship is found to have a significant impact on economic growth. This finding is consistent with extant findings in the literature that it is fast growing new firms, not new firms in general, that accounted for most of the new job creation by small and medium enterprises in advanced countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • P. Aghion P. Howitt (1992) ArticleTitleA Model of Growth through Creative Destruction Econometrica 60 323–351

    Google Scholar 

  • D. B. Audretsch (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., M. A. Carree and R. Thurik, 2001, ‘Does Entrepreneurship Reduce Unemployment?’, Discussion paper TI01-074/3, Tinbergen Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

  • D. B. Audretsch M. A. Carree A. J. . Stel Particlevan R. Thurik (2002) ArticleTitleImpeded Industrial Restructuring: The Growth Penalty Kyklos 55 IssueID1 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • D. B. Audretsch R. Thurik (2000) ArticleTitleCapitalism and Democracy in the 21st Century: From the Managed to the Entrepreneurial Economy Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10 IssueID1 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., P.-K. Wong and P. D. Reynolds, 2003, ‘National Factors Influencing the Prevalence of “High-Potential” Start-Ups’, NUS Entrepreneurship Centre Research Working Paper.

  • J. Baldwin G. Picot (1995) ArticleTitleEmployment Generation by Small Producers in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector Small Business Economics 7 317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Barro (1991) ArticleTitleEconomic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 IssueID2 407–443

    Google Scholar 

  • WJ. Baumol (1993) Entrepreneurship, Management and the Structure of Payoffs MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • >Birch, D., 1979, The Job Generation Process, Final Report to Economic Development Administration, Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Neighbourhood and Regional Change.

  • D. Birch (1987) Job Creation in America: How our Smallest Companies Put the Most People to Work The Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DA. Birch A. Haggerty W. Parsons (1997) Who’s Creating Jobs? Cognetics Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Carree A. J. . Stel Particlevan R. Thurik S. Wennekers (2002) ArticleTitleEconomic Development and Business Ownership: An Analysis using Data of 23 OECD Countries in the Period 1976–1996 Small Business Economics 19 271–290

    Google Scholar 

  • MA. Carree R. Thurik (2003) ‘The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth’ J. Acs (Eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research Kluwer-Academic Publishers Boston/Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • CM. Cipolla (1981) Before the Industrial Revolution: European Society and Economy, 1000–1700 EditionNumber2 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Coe E. Helpman (1995) ArticleTitleInternational R&D Spillovers European Economic Review 39 859–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., 2003, ‘The Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: Some Suggestions’, in Jerome A. Katz and Dean Shepherd (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Entrepreneurship Research, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 6, pp. 315–372.

  • P. Davidsson F. Delmar (2003) Hunting for New Employment: The Role of High Growth Firms D.A. Kirby A. Watson (Eds) Small Firms and Economic Development in Developed and Transition Economies: A Reader Ashgate Publishing Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Davidsson L. Lindmark C. Olofsson (1995) ArticleTitleSmall Firms, Business Dynamics and Differential Development of Economic Well-Being Small Business Economics 7 301–315

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Davidsson L. Lindmark C. Olofsson (1998) ArticleTitle‘Smallness, Newness and Regional Development’ Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 28 57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • H.-J. Engelbrecht (1997) ArticleTitleInternational R&D Spillovers amongst OECD Economies Applied Economics Letters 4 315–319

    Google Scholar 

  • D. S. Evans L. S. Leighton (1989) ArticleTitleThe Determinants of Changes in U.S. Self-Employment Small Business Economics 1 IssueID2 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • D. S. Evans L. S. Leighton (1990) ArticleTitleSmall Business Formation by Unemployed and Employed Workers Small Business Economics 2 IssueID4 319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fritsch P. Mueller (2004) ArticleTitleEffects of New Business Formation on Regional Development over Time Regional Studies 38 961–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Griliches (1990) ArticleTitlePatent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey Journal of Economic Literature 28 1661–1707

    Google Scholar 

  • GM. Grossman E. Helpman (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2001, ‘R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries’, STI Working Paper 2001/3, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD, Geneva.

  • B. Harrison (1994) ArticleTitleThe Small Firm Myth California Management Review 36 142–158

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Jovanovic (1982 and 1994) ArticleTitle‘Entrepreneurial Choice When People Differ in their Management and Labor Skills’ Small Business Economics 6 IssueID3 185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • BA. Kirchoff (1994) Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism Praeger Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • IM. Kirzner (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Lazonick (1991) Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F. R., 1993, ‘R&D Investment and International Productivity Differences’, Working Paper No. 4161, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • R. E. Lucas (1978) ArticleTitleOn the Size Distribution of Business Firms Bell Journal of Economics 9 508–523

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lumpkin G. G. Dess (1996) ArticleTitleClarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance Academy of Management Review 21 135–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1972, ‘Contribution of Research and Development to Economic Growth of the United States’, Papers and Proceedings of a Colloquim on Research and Development and Economic Growth Productivity, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

  • Nadiri, I., 1993, ‘Innovations and Technological Spillovers’, Working Paper 423, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

  • Picot, G., M. Manser and Z. Lin, 1998, ‘The Role of Self-Employment in Job Creation In Canada and the U.S’., OECD-CERF-CILN International Conference on Self-Employment, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.

  • M. Porter (1990) The Comparative Advantage of Nations Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P. D. Reynolds (1999) Creative Destruction: Source or Symptom of Economic Growth? Zoltan J. Acs Bo. Carlsson Charlie. Karlsson (Eds) Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy Cambridge University Press Canmbridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., M. Hay and S. Michael Camp, 1999, GEM Global 1999 Executive Report, Kansas City: Kaufman Center.

  • Reynolds, P. D., M. Hay, W. D. Bygrave, S. Michael Camp and E. Autio, 2000, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2000 Executive Report, Kaufman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership at the Ewing Marion Kaufman Foundation.

  • Reynolds, P. D., S. Michael Camp, W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio, and M. Hay, 2001, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Global 2001 Executive Report, Kansas City: Kaufman Center.

  • Reynolds, P. D., S. Michael Camp, W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio and M. Hay, 2002, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Global 2002 Executive Report, Kansas City: Kaufman Center.

  • P. D. Reynolds D. J. Storey P. Westhead (1994) ArticleTitleCross-National Comparisons of the Variation in New Firm Formation Rates Regional Studies 28 IssueID4 443–456

    Google Scholar 

  • P. M. Romer (1986) ArticleTitleIncreasing Returns and Long Run Growth Journal of Political Economy 94 1002–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • P. M. Romer (1990) ArticleTitleEndogenous Technological Change Journal of Political Economy 98 S71–S102

    Google Scholar 

  • V. W. Ruttan (1997) ArticleTitleInduced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources of Technical Change Economic Journal 107 1520–1529

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Schmitz (1989) ArticleTitleImitation, Entrepreneurship, and Long-Run Growth Journal of Political Economy 97 721–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1911, Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung ueber Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot; translated by Redvers Opie, 1934 & 1963, The Theory of Economic Development: an Inquiry into Profits, capital, credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Oxford: Oxford university Press.

  • JA. Schumpeter (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy Harper and Row New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Solow (1956) ArticleTitleA Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Storey (1991) ArticleTitleThe Birth of New Firms–Does Unemployment Matter? A Review of the Evidence Small Business Economics 3 IssueID3 167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • DJ. Storey (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector Routledge London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Thurik S. Wennekers (2004) ArticleTitleEntrepreneurship, Small Business and Economic Growth Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11 IssueID1 140–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A. J., 2003, ‘COMPENDIA 2000.2: A Harmonized Data Set of Business Ownership Rates in 23 OECD Countries’, EIM Research Report H200302, Zoetermeer, NL: EIM.

  • AJ. Stel ParticleVan DJ. Storey (2004) ArticleTitle‘The Link between Firm Births and Job Creation: Is there a Upas Tree Effect?’ Regional Studies 38 893–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A. J., M. A. Carree and R. Thurik, 2004, ‘The Effect of Entrepreneurship on National Economic Growth: An Analysis using the GEM Database’, Small Business Economics, this issue.

  • B. Verspagen (1992) ArticleTitleEndogenous Innovation in Neo-Classical Growth Models: A Survey Journal of Macroeconomics 14 631–662

    Google Scholar 

  • L. W. Weiss (1976) Optimal Plant Scale and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity R. T. Masson P. . David Qualls (Eds) Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain Ballinger Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Wennekers R. Thurik (1999) ArticleTitleLinking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth Small Business Economics 13 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Westhead M. Cowling (1995) ArticleTitleEmployment Change in Independent Owner-Managed High-Technology Firms in Great Britain Small Business Economics 7 111–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poh Kam Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, P.K., Ho, Y.P. & Autio, E. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Bus Econ 24, 335–350 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1

Keywords

  • entrepreneurship
  • economic growth