Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998–2003

Abstract.

The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor research program was designed as a comprehensive assessment of the role of entrepreneurship in national economic growth. The conceptual model reflected in a wide range of factors associated with national variations in entrepreneurial activity and the major contextual features. Empirical tests of the many relationships in the model required four major data collection activities: adult population surveys, unstructured interviews with national experts, self-administered questionnaires completed by national experts, and assembly of relevant standardized measures from existing cross-national data sets. Adult population surveys were implemented to identify those entrepreneurially active, which required a set of precise criteria and careful processing to ensure harmonized counts and prevalence rates across 41 countries. Existing evidence on measures of reliability indicates that the measures met contemporary standards and the project was cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., C. Armington and A. Robb, 1999, ‘Measures of Job Flow Dynamics in the U.S. Economy. Upper Marlboro, Maryland’, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Center for Economic Studies, Discussion Paper.

  2. Adaman, F. and P. Devine, 2002, ‘A Reconsideration of the Theory of Entrepreneurship: A Participatory Approach’, Review of Political Economy, 329–355.

  3. Arenius, P. and M. Minniti, 2005, ‘Perceptual Variables and Nascent Entrepreneurship’, Small Business Economics, this issue.

  4. H. Barreto (1989) The Entrepreneur in Microeconomic Theory Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. J. Baumol (1968) ArticleTitleEntrepreneurship in Economic Theory American Economic Review 58 IssueID2 64–71

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birch, D. L., 1979, ‘The Job Generation Process’. Unpublished report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Program on Neighbourhood and Regional Change for the Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

  7. N. Bosma Verhoeven (2004) ‘Benchmark Entrepreneurship 2003’ EIM Zoetermeer

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bygrave, W. D., 2004, ‘Financing Entrepreneurs and Their Ventures’, in P. D. Reynolds, W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio, et al. (eds.), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2003, Executive Report, Babson College/Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, London Business School.

  9. W. D. Bygrave P. D. Reynolds (2004) Who finances startups in the USA? A comprehensive study of informal investors, 1998–2003. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: 2004 Babson College Babson Park, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. S. Christensen O. O. Madsen R. Peterson (1994) Conceptualizing entrepreneurial opportunity identification G. E. Hills (Eds) Marketing and Entrepreneurship: Research Ideas and Opportunities Quorum Books Westport, Connecticut/London

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Curtin (1982) ArticleTitleIndicators of Consumer Behavior: The University of Michigan Survey of Consumers Public Opinion Quarterly 46 340–362

    Google Scholar 

  12. Djankov, S., F. De Silanes and A. Shleifer, 2001, The Regulation of Entry NBER Working Paper No. w7892.

  13. European Communities, 2004, Business Demography in Europe, 2004 Edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union, 2004.

  14. G. Eliason M. Henrekson (2004) ArticleTitle‘William J. Baumol: An Entrepreneurial Economist on the Economics of Entrepreneurship’ Small Business Economics 23 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. B. Gartner (1985) ArticleTitleA framework for describing and classifying the phenomenon of new venture creation Academy of Management Review 10 IssueID4 696–706

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. B. Gartner (1990) ArticleTitleWhat are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing 5 IssueID1 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. B. Gartner K. G. Shaver N. M. Carter P. D. Reynolds (Eds) (2004) The Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation, Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heritage Foundation, 2000, Index of Economic Freedom 1999, Washington DC: Heritage Foundation and New York: Wall Street Journal.

  19. ILO, 1999, LABORSTA database, Available at http://laborsta.ilo.org/.

  20. IMD, 2002, The World Competitiveness Yearbook 2002, Institute for Management Development, Switzerland, ISBN: 2970012162.

  21. International Monetary Fund, 2002, World Economic Outlook Database, Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2002/02/data/index.htm.

  22. J. Katz W. B. Gartner (1988) ArticleTitleProperties of Emerging Organizations Academy of Management Review 13 429–441

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Kihlstrom L. Jean-Jacques (1979) ArticleTitle‘A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation based on Risk Aversion” Journal of Political Economy 87 719–748

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. M. Kirzner (1979) Perception, Opportunity and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. T. Le (1999) ArticleTitleEmpirical Studies of Self–employment Journal of Economic Surveys 13 381–416

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. T. Lumpkin G. G. Dess (1996) ArticleTitleClarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance Academy of Management Review 21 IssueID1 135–172

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Mahoney S. Michael (2004) A Subjective Theory of Entrepreneurship S. Alvarez (Eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Boston Kluwer, forthcoming MA

    Google Scholar 

  28. InstitutionalAuthorNameOECD (1999) Main Science and Technology Indicators OECD Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pilat, D., 2001, Firm-Level Data In OECD Member Countries: An Inventory Of Existing Resources, OECD Working paper AH(2001)2.

  30. P. D. Reynolds (1997) ArticleTitleWho Starts New Firms? Preliminary Explorations of Firms-in-Gestation Small Business Economics 9 449–462

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. D. Reynolds (2000) ‘National Panel Study of U.S. Business Start-ups: Background and Methodology’ J. A. Katz (Eds) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth JAI Press Stanford, CT 153–227

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. D. Reynolds (2004) Nature of Business Start-ups W. B. Gartner (Eds) et al. The Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA 244–258

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. D. Reynolds Richard Curtin (2004) Examples of Analysis: Work File Preparation, Comparisons, and Adjustment of Weights W. B. Gartner (Eds) et al. The Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA 495–540

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. D. Reynolds B. A. Miller (1992) ArticleTitleNew firm gestation: conception, birth, and implications for research Journal of Business Venturing 7 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. D. Reynolds S. B. White (1993) Wisconsin’s Entrepreneurial Climate Study Marquette University Center for the Study of Entrepreneurship Milwaukee, WI

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. D. Reynolds S. B. White (1997) The Entrepreneurial Process: Economic Growth, Men, Women, and Minorities Quorum Books Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  37. Reynolds, P. D., W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio, L. W. Cox and M. Hay, 2003, ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2002’ Executive Report, Babson College/Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, London Business School.

  38. Reynolds, P. D., W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio, et al., 2004, ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2003’, Executive Report, Babson College/Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, London Business School.

  39. Samuelsson, M., 2002, ‘Creating New Ventures: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Nascent Venturing Process’, Jonkoping, Sweden: Jonkoping International Business School Dissertation Series No. 020.

  40. K. Schwab J. Sachs (1997) The Global Competitiveness Report: 1997 World Economic Forum Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  41. K. Schwab J. Sachs (1998) The Global Competitiveness Report: 1998 World Economic Forum Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smith, Adam, 1776, in Edwin Cannan (ed.), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, NY: Random House, 1994.

  43. Sternberg, R. and A. R. M. Wennekers, 2005, Determinants and Effects of New Business Creation; Investigations Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, Small Business Economics, This issue.

  44. A. R. Thurik A. R. M. Wennekers (2004) ArticleTitle“Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11 140–149

    Google Scholar 

  45. United Nations, 1990, Statistical Office of the United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, International Standard Classification of Economic Activities: 3rd Edition. New York: United Nations.

  46. United Nations Development Program, 2003, Human Development Report, Oxford University Press, Oxford, http://hdr.undp.org/reports/default.cfm.

  47. UNESCO EFA Monitoring Team, 2002, The 2002 Education for all Global Monitoring Report, UNESCO, Paris, ISBN 92-3-10-103880-X .

  48. UNESCO Statistics World Education Statistics Time Series. Data. http://www.uis.unesco.org/en/stats/statistics/indicators/i_pages/indic_2.htm (accessed 21/06/2003).

  49. U.S. Bureau of the Census, International Programs Center, 1999, International Database (IDB) Available at http://blue.census.gov/ipc/www/idbnew.html (accessed 26/03/2003).

  50. United States Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, 2004, The Small Business Economy: 2004: A Report to the President, Washington, DC, 2004, Table A.4, pp. 176.

  51. Van Gelderen, M., N. Bosma and R. Thurik, 2005, ‘Success and Risk Factors in the Start-up Phase’, Small Business Economics, forthcoming.

  52. C. M. Praag ParticleVan (1999) ArticleTitleSome Classic Views on Entrepreneurship De Economist 147 311–335

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ingrid Verheul A. R. M. Wennekers David Audretsch Roy Thurik (2002) An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship: Policies, Institutions and Culture D. B. Audretsch A. R. Thurik I. Verheul A.R.M. Wennekers (Eds) Entrepreneurship: Determinants and Policy in a European–US Comparison Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston/Dordrecht 11–81

    Google Scholar 

  54. InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Bank (2002) World Development Indicators 2002 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  55. InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Economic Forum (2002) Global Competitiveness Report 2001—2002 Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Reynolds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E. et al. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998–2003. Small Bus Econ 24, 205–231 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1980-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • entrepreneurship