Skip to main content

Determinants and Effects of New Business Creation Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data

Abstract.

This paper is an introduction to the present special issue dedicated to scientific research using data collected as part of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and considering new venture creation as the hallmark of entrepreneurship. After a short description of GEM’s theoretical and methodological background, this introduction highlights the main results of seven papers which were presented at the First GEM Research Conference in Berlin from 1 to 3 April 2004. First, there is empirical evidence that the role of entrepreneurial activity differs across the stages of economic development, in that there appears to be a U-shaped relationship between the level of development and the rate of entrepreneurship. Consequently, a positive effect of entrepreneurial activity on economic growth is found for highly developed countries but a negative effect for developing nations. Second, it is shown that different types of entrepreneurship may have a different impact on a nation’s innovativeness and economic growth rate. In particular, potentially high-growth business start-ups and so-called opportunity entrepreneurship enhance knowledge spillovers and economic growth. Third, entrepreneurship is again shown to be a regional event that can only be understood if regional framework conditions, including networks and regional policies, are taken into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Z. J. Acs D. B. Audretsch (Eds) (2003) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Acs D. Audretsch P. Braunerhjelm B. Carlsson (2004) The Missing Link: The Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth. Discussion Paper, Center for Economic Policy Research London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Acs D. Storey (2004) ArticleTitle‘Introduction: ‘Entrepreneurship and Economic Development” Regional Studies 38 IssueID(8) 871–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z., P. Arenius, M. Hay and M. Minniti, 2004, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004 Executive Report, Babson College and London Business School.

  • Acs, Z. and A. Varga, 2005, ‘Entrepreneurship, Agglomerations and Technological Change’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • Arenius, P. and M. Minniti, 2005, ‘Perceptual Variables and Nascent Entrepreneurship’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • Arenius, P. and D. DeClercq, 2005, ‘A Network-Based Approach on Opportunity Recognition’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • D. B. Audretsch R. Thurik I. Verheul S. Wennekers (Eds) (2002) Entrepreneurship: Determinants and Policy in a European-US Comparison, Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston/Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Carree A. R. Thurik (2003) The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth J.Acs Zoltan B.Audretsch David (Eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston/Dordrecht 437–471

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Cooper (2003) Entrepreneurship: The Past, the Present, the Future J.Acs Zoltan B.Audretsch David (Eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston/Dordrecht 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Feldman (2001) ArticleTitleThe Entrepreneurial Event Revisited: Firm Formation in a Regional Context Industrial and Corporate Change 10 861–891

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fritsch G. Reinhold B. Udo M. Niese (2002) ‘Gründungen Deutschland: Datenquellen, Niveau und räumlich-sektorale Struktur’ J. Schmude R. Leiner (Eds) Unternehmensgründungen Heidelberg Physica 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • W. B. Gartner (1989) ArticleTitleSome Suggestions for Research on Entrepreneurial Traits and Characteristics Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 14 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • R.F. Hébert A.N. Link (1982) The Entrepreneur: Mainstream Views and Radical Critiques Praeger New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. F. Hébert A.N. Link (1989) ArticleTitle‘In Search of the Meaning of Entrepreneurship’. Small Business Economics 1 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • B. F. Hoselitz (1960) The Early History of Entrepreneurial Theory J. J. Spengler W. R. Allen (Eds) Essays in Economic Thought: Aristotle to Marshall Rand McNally Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Kilby (1971) Hunting the Heffalump P. Kilby (Eds) Entrepreneurship and Economic Development The Free Press New York 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Kent D. L. Sexton K. H. Vesper (Eds) (1982) Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (why page numbers?? Complete book or just one chapter?) Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ 72–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional Studies, 2004, Special Issue ‘Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: Essays in Honour of David Keeble’, 38(8).

  • P. D. Reynolds D. J. Storey P. Westhead (1994) ArticleTitleCross-national Comparisons of the Variation in New Firm Formation Rates Regional Studies 28 IssueID(4) 443–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., M. Hay and S. M. Camp, 1999, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 1999 Executive Report, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

  • Reynolds, P. D., M. Hay, W. D. Bygrave, S. M. Camp and E. Autio, 2000, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2000 Executive Report, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

  • Reynolds, P. D., S. M. Camp, W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio and M. Hay, 2001, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2001 Executive Report, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

  • Reynolds, P. D., W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio, L. W. Cox and M. Hay, 2002, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2002 Executive Report, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

  • Reynolds, P. D., W. D. Bygrave, and E. Autio et al., 2003, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2003 Executive Report, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

  • Reynolds, P., N. Bosma and E. Autio et al., 2005, ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998–2003’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • Rocha, H. and R. Sternberg, 2005, ‘Entrepreneurship: The Role of Clusters; Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence from Germany’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • Stel van, A., M. Carree and R. Thurik, 2005, ‘The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • R. Swedberg (Eds) (2000) Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • K. H. Vesper (1988) ArticleTitleEntrepreneurial Academics–How Can We Tell when the Field Is Getting Somewhere? Journal of Business Venturing 3 IssueID(1) 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Wagner R. Sternberg (2004) ArticleTitleStart-up Activities, Individual Characteristics, and the Regional Milieu: Lessons for Entrepreneurship Support Policies from German Micro Data The Annals of Regional Science 38 219–240

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Wennekers R. Thurik (1999) ArticleTitleLinking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth Small Business Economics 13 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., A. van Stel R. Thurik and P. Reynolds, 2005, ‘Nascent Entrepreneurship and Economic Development’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • G. de Wit (1993) Determinants of Self-Employment Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., Y. P. Ho and E. Autio, 2005, ‘Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM Data’, Small Business Economics, present issue.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Sternberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sternberg, R., Wennekers, S. Determinants and Effects of New Business Creation Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data. Small Bus Econ 24, 193–203 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1974-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1974-z

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Industrial Organization
  • Entrepreneurial Activity
  • Regional Framework
  • Regional Policy