Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defining entrepreneurship as the creation of new organisations,this paper explores,from a literature review standpoint,the moderating effect of clusters on the impact of entrepreneurship on development. To identify potential causes of this moderating effect, the paper focuses on three different impacts: entrepreneurship on development, clusters on development,and clusters on entrepreneurship. The findings of the paper are threefold.First,entrepreneurship is positively associated with economic growth.Given the importance of entrepreneurship in changing the economic and social structure of the economy,more research on the impact of entrepreneurship on development - i.e. focus on capabilities rather than on output - is needed. Second,it is difficult to reach empirical generalisations on the impact of clusters on development and entrepreneurship given conceptual and methodological constraints. Both positive results and caveats are found at different levels of analysis and at different stages of development of a cluster. Finally, given the previous finding, it is difficult to generalise on the impact of clusters on the association between entrepreneurship and development. Consensus on and validity between conceptual and operational definitions of clusters; consideration of context as well as process and, therefore, quantitative and qualitative methods; and differentiation between levels of analysis controlling for cluster stage and strength are the main criteria for future studies to consider to disentangle the impact of clusters on entrepreneurship, development and the association between entrepreneurship and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P. and J. Williamson, 1998, Growth, Inequality and Growth: Theory, History and Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., 1999, Organizations Evolving, London: Sage.

  • Aldrich, H. E. and M. A. Martinez, ‘Many are Called, But Few Are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the Study of Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25, 41–56.

  • Allen, T. and A. Thomas, 2000, Poverty and Development into the 21st Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., 2000, ‘Industrial Districts’, in E. Sheppard and T. J. Barnes (eds.), A Companion to Economic Geography, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., pp. 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, H. and J. Taylor, 2000, Regional Economics and Policy, 3rd edn, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B., 1989, ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events’, Economic Journal 99, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B., 1990, ‘Silicon Valley Locational Clusters - When Do Increasing Returns Imply Monopoly’, Mathematical Social Sciences 19, 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzeni, S. and J. Pellegrin, 1997, ‘Entrepreneurship and Local Development’, The OECD Observer 204, 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzeni, S., 1998, ‘Entrepreneurship and Job Creation’, The OECD Observer, December/January, 18–20.

  • Asheim, B., 1997, ‘ “Learning Regions” in a Globalised World Economy: Towards a New Competitive Advantage of Industrial Districts?’, in S. Conti and M. Taylor (eds.), Interdependent and Uneven Development: Global-Local Perspectives, London: Avebury, pp. 143–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., 2000, ‘Industrial Districts: The Contributions of Marshall and Beyond’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., 1998, ‘Agglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., 2000, ‘Corporate Form and Spatial Form’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman, 1996, ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, American Economic Review 86, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. and P. E. Stephan, 1996, ‘Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology’, American Economic Review 86, 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. M. Fritsch, 2000, Growth Regimes over Time and Space.

  • Audretsch, D. B. and M. Fritsch, 2000, Growth Regimes over Time and Space. Audretsch, D. B. and A. R. Thurik, 2000, ‘Capitalism and Democracy in the 21st Century: From the Managed to the Entrepreneurial Economy’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austrian, Z., 2000, ‘Cluster Case Studies: the Marriage of Quantitative and Qualitative Information for Action’, Economic Development Quarterly 14, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydalot, P. (ed.), 1986, Milieux Innovateurs en Europe, Paris: GREMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R. and P. Swann, 1998, ‘Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More?’, Research Policy 27, 525–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R. and G. M. P. Swann, 1999, ‘A Comparison of Clustering Dynamics in the US and UK Computer Industries’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9, 373–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin, 1995, Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C. and S. J. Mezias, 1992, ‘Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1990’, Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 580–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C. and C. Oliver, 1996, ‘Toward an Institutional Ecology of Organizational Founding’, Academy of Management Journal 39, 1378–1427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C. and H. A. Haveman, 1997, ‘Love Thy Neighbor? Differentiation and Agglomeration in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1990’, Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 304–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., 1968, ‘Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory’, American Economic Review, 64–71.

  • Baumol, W. J., 1990, ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’, Journal of Political Economy, 893–921

  • Becattini, G., 1979, ‘Dal “settore industriale” al “distretto industriale” . Alcune considerazioni sull’ unita d’indagine del’economia industriale’, cited in G. L. Becattini (ed.), Sectors and/or Districts: Some Remarks on the Conceptual Foundations of Industrial Economics, Rivista di Economia e Politica Industriale, pp. 123–135.

  • Becattini, G., 1989, ‘Sectors and/or Districts: Some Remarks on the Conceptual Foundations of Industrial Economics’, in E. Goodman et al. (ed.), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, London: Routledge, pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G., 1990, ‘The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion’, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechard, J., 1994, ‘Understanding the Field of Entrepreneurship: A Synthesis of the Most Often Quoted Contributions’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.

  • Bergman, E. M. and E. J. Feser, 1999, Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications, WebBooks.

  • Birch, D. A., 1981, ‘Who Creates Jobs?’, The Public Interest, 3–14.

  • Brock, W. A. E. D. S., 1989, ‘Small Business Economics’, Small Business Economics 1, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S., 1992, ‘Small Firms and the Provision of Real Services’, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D. and C. W. Hofer, 1991, ‘Theorizing About Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 16, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R., 1991, ‘“Local Milieu”, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Towards a New Dynamic Theory of Economic Space’, in Camagni (ed.), London: Belhaven Press, pp. 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., 1996, ‘Industrial Enterprises and Economic Space: the Network Paradigm’, European Planning Studies 4, 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R. and J. Wade, 1991, ‘Density Dependence in the Organizational Evolution of the American Brewing Industry Across Different Levels of Analysis’, Social Science Research 20, 271–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., 2000, The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceglie, G. and M. Dini, 1999, ‘SMEs Cluster and Network Development in Developing Countries: The Experience of UNIDO’, UNIDO - Private Sector Development Branch, Working Paper No. 2, 1–25.

  • Chinitz, B., 1961, ‘Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburg’, American Economic Review 51, 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G. N. and D. W. Lyon, ‘Issues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The Past Decade’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 25(4), 101–113.

  • Coates, D., 2000, Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., 1988, Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, S., E. Malecki and P. E. Oinas, 1995, The Industrial Enterprise and its Environment: Spatial Perspective, Aldershot: Avebury.

  • Cooper, A. C., J. A. Hornaday and K. H. Vesper, 1997, ‘The Field of Entrepreneurship Over Time’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.

  • Cosentino, F., F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger, 1996, Local and Regional Response to Global Pressure: The Case of Italy and its Industrial Districts, Research Series 103, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, M. P. and R. W. Shenton, 1996, Doctrines of Development, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., P. Le Gales, C. Trigilia and H. Voelzkow, 2001, Local Production Systems in Europe. Rise or Demise? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J., 1998, ‘Promoting Competitiveness for Small Business Clusters through Collaborative Learning: Policy Consequences from an European Perspective’, in M. Steiner (ed.), London: Pion Ltd., pp. 238–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czamanski, D. and S. Czamanski, 1977, ‘Industrial Complexes: Their Typology, Structure, and Relation to Economic Development’, Papers of the Regional Science Association 38, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czamanski, D. and L. A. de Ablas, 1979, ‘Identification of Industrial Clusters and Complexes: A Comparison of Methods and Findings’, Urban Studies 16, 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., M. B. Low and M. Wright, 2001, ‘Editor’s Introduction: Low and MacMillan Ten Years On: Achievements and Future Directions for Entrepreneurship Research’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 25(4), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBresson, Ch. and X. Hu, 1999, ‘Identifying Clusters of Innovative Activity: A New Approach and a Toolbox’, in OECD (ed.), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Chapter 2, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debru, E. and F. Saget, 1999, Identification des operateurs dans le cadre des Systemes Productifs Localises en France - Rapport final (Identification of the operators in the frame of the Local Productive Systems in France - Final Report). Tecsa Consultant.

  • Department of the Environment, T.a.t.R., 1997, Sustainable Communities for the 21st Century, London: HSMO.

  • DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell, 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer. P. B and D. G. Terkla, 1999, ‘Business Strategy and Cross-Industry Clusters’, in J. P. Blair and L. A. Reese (eds.), Approaches to Economic Development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., pp. 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, D. H. and W. H. Glick, 1994, ‘Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building - Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling’, Academy of Management Review 19, 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI - Department of Trade and Industry UK, 2001, Business Clusters in the UK - A First Assessment, London: Department of Trade and Industry - UK.

  • Dunning, J. H., 1998, Regions, Globalization and the Knowledge Economy: The Issues Stated, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M., 2001, ‘Regional Clusters: What We Know and What We Should Know’, Kiel Institute International Workshop on Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition, 1–28.

  • Enright, M. and I. Fflowcs-Williams, 2001, ‘Local Partnership, Clusters and SME Globalization’, in OECD (ed.), Paris: OECD, pp. 115–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani et al., 2000, ‘L’efficienza delle imprese nei distretti industriali Italiani’, in F. Signorini (ed.), Rome: Meridiana Libri, Corigliano Calabro (CS), pp. 21–49.

  • Feldman, M., 2000, ‘Location and Innovation: The New Economic Geography of Innovation, Spillovers, and Agglomeration’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P., 1994, The Geography of Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. J., 1998, ‘Old and New Theories of Industry Clusters’, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, London: Pion Ltd., pp. 18–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. J. and E. M. Bergman, 2000, ‘National Industry Cluster Templates: A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis’, Regional Studies.

  • Fine, B., 2000, ‘Endogenous Growth Theory: A Critical Assessment’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 24, 245–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. and M. Keeney, 1990, The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America’s Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., 1987, Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Printer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofoli, G., 1992, Endogenous Development in Southern Europe, Averbury: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., 1989, ‘ “Who is an Entrepreneur?” is the Wrong Question’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 13, 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., H. D. Kallal, J. A. Scheinkman and A. Shleifer, 1992, ‘Growth in Cities’, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasmeier, A., 1994, ‘Flexible Districts, Flexible Regions? The Institutional and Cultural Limits to Districts in an Era of Globalisation and Technological Paradigm Shifts’, in A. Amin and N. Thrift (eds.), Globalisation, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, Chapter 6 Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, U. and H. Voelzkow, 2001, ‘The Governance of Local Economies in Germany’, in C. Crouch, P. Le Gales, C. Trigilia and H. Voelzkow (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I. and P. McCann, 2000, ‘Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?’, Urban Studies 37, 513–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G., 1993, The Embedded Firm, London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., 1985, ‘Economic-Action and Social-Structure - the Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. and G. R. Carroll, 1992, Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. and J. Freeman, 1989, Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B., 1992, ‘Industrial Districts - Old Wine in New Bottles’, Regional Studies 26, 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrrison, B., 1994, Lean and Mean, New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt and J. Perraton, 1999, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R., 1997, ‘Continuities and Changes in Social Systems of Production: The Cases of Japan, Germany, and United States’, in J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddedness of Institutions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E., 1937, Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P. and P. W. Roberts, 2000, ‘Friendships Among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry’, American Journal of Sociology 106, 387–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W., 1956, Location and Space-Economy, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., 1989, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 79, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, D. and F. Wilkinson, 2000, High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, C. A., 1982, ‘Entrepreneurship in Economic Development’, in C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton and K. H. Vesper (eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M., 1982, ‘The Theory of Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth’, in C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton and K. H. Vesper (eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S., 1996, ‘Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation Over the Product Life Cycle’, American Economic Review 86, 562–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., 1991, Trade and Geography, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., 1998, ‘What’s New in the New Economic Geography?’, Oxford Review of Economics Policy 14, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., 2000, ‘Where in the World is the New Economic Geography’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichty, R. W. and K. R. Knudsen, 1999, ‘Measuring Regional Economic Base’, Economic Development Review, 47–52.

  • Liebeskind, J., A. L. Oliver, L. Zucker and M. Brewer, 1996, ‘Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms’, Organization Science 7, 428–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesay, H. C., 1982, ‘Entrepreneurial History’, in C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton and K. H. Vesper (eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomi, A., 2000, ‘Density Dependence and Spatial Duality in Organizational Founding Rates: Danish Commercial Banks, 1846–1989’, Organization Studies 21, 433–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomi, A., 1995, ‘The Population Ecology of Organizational Founding - Location Dependence and Unobserved Heterogeneity’, Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 111–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, C. and D. Keeble, 2000, ‘High-Technology Clusters and Evolutionary Trends in the 1990s’, in D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson (eds.), Aldershot, England: Ashgate, pp. 21–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, M. B. and I. C. MacMillan, 1988, ‘Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges’, Journal of Management 14, 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., 1988, ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A., 1992, National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. and S. Borras, 1998, The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, Luxembourg.

  • Lundvall, B.-A. and B. Johnson, 1994, ‘The Learning Economy’, Journal of Industry Studies 1, 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. and P. Maskell, 2000, ‘Nation States and Economic Development: From National Systems of Production to National Systems of Knowledge Creation and Learning’, in G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maillat, D., 1996, ‘Regional Productive Systems and Innovative Millieux’, in OECD (ed.), Networks of Enterprises and Local Development, Chapter 3, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J., 1994, ‘Entrepreneurship in Regional and Local Development’, International Regional Science Review 16, 119–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, A. and P. Maskell, 1997, ‘Towards and Explanation of Regional Specialization and Industry Agglomeration’, European Planning Studies 5(1), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., 1996, ‘Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts’, Economic Geography 72, 293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., 1966 (1890), Principles of Economics, 8th edn, London: Mcmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. and P. Sunley, 2002, Deconstructing Clusters: Chaotic Concept of Policy Panacea. 1–60. Paper presented at High Technology Small Firms One-Day Cluster Conference, organised by Manchester Business School and the Small Business Service.

  • Morris, A., 1998, Geography and Development, London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadvi, 1995, ‘Industrial Clusters and Networks: Case Studies of SME Growth and Innovation’, UNIDO, 1–78.

  • Nelson, A. C., 1993, ‘Theories of Regional Development’, in R. D. Bingham and R. Mier (eds.), Theories of Local Economic Development. Perspectives from Across the Disciplines, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., 1996, ‘From the M-Form to the N-Form: Taking Stock of Changes in the Large Industrial Corporation’, London Business School Working Paper SLRP WP16/1996.

  • Nohria, N., 1992, ‘Is a Network Perspective a Useful Way of Studying Organizations’, in N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations, Chapter 1, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N. and R. G. Eccles, 1992, Networks and Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R. P., 1995, High-Technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth, London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatory of European SMEs, 2002, Regional Clusters in Europe. 3. Belgium: Enterprise Publications, European Commission, pp. 1–66.

  • OECD, 1996a, Networks of Enterprises and Local Economic Development, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD, 1996b, SMEs: Employment, Innovation and Growth: The Washington Workshop, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD, 1998, Fostering Entrepreneurship, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD, 1999, Boosting Innovation - The Cluster Approach, Paris: OECD Proceedings.

  • OECD, 2000, ‘Local Development and Job Creation’, OECD Observer - Policy Brief.

  • OECD, 2001a, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, Paris, France: OECD.

  • OECD, 2001b, World Congress on Local Clusters - Proceedings, Paris, France: OECD - DATAR.

  • OECD, 2002, International Conference on Territorial Development: Local Clusters, Restructuring Territories, and Environment-Enterprises-Districts, Paris, France: OECD - DATAR.

  • Patel, P. and K. Pavitt, 1991, ‘Large Firms in the Production of the World’s Technology: An Important Case of Non- Globalization’, Journal of International Business Studies, 1–21.

  • Peneder, M., 1995, ‘Cluster Techniques as a Method to Analyze Industrial Competitiveness’, International Advances in Economic Research 1, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J. and Ch. F. Sabel, 1984, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K., 1944, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., 1967, The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1996, ‘Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies, and Regional Policy’, International Regional Science Review 19, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1998, On Competition, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 197–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 2000 Feb, ‘Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy’, Economic Development Quarterly 14, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 2001, ‘Enhancing the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: The Current Competitiveness Index’, in K. Schwab, M. Porter and J. Sachs (eds.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., Monitor Group, ontheFRONTIER and Council on Competitiveness, 2001, Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of U.S. Competitiveness, Washington, DC: Council of Competitiveness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., J. Sachs and S. Warner, 2000, ‘Executive Summary’, in K. Schwab, M. Porter, J. Sachs et al. (eds.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2000, World Economic Forum.

  • Pouder, R. and C. H. St. John, 1996, ‘Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation’, Academy of Management Review 21, 1192–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., 1990, ‘Neither Market Nor Hierarchy - Network Forms of Organization’, Research in Organizational Behavior 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and R. A. Bettis, 1986, ‘The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance’, Strategic Management Journal 7, 485–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, F., G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger, 1992, Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, F. and W. Sengenberger, 1992, Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabellotti, R., 1995, ‘Is There an Industrial District Model - Footwear Districts in Italy and Mexico Compared’, World Development 23, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabellotti, R. and H. Schmitz, 1999, ‘The Internal Heterogeneity of Industrial Districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico’, Regional Studies 33, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M., 2000, ‘Competition, Collaboration and the New Industrial Districts: Examining the Institutional Turn in Local Economic Development’, Urban Studies 36, 951–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallet, A. and A. Torre, 1998, ‘On Geography and Technology: Proximity Relations in Localised Innovation Networks’, In M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, London: Pion Ltd., pp. 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G., F. Stewart and A. Ramirez, 2000, ‘Economic Growth and Human Development’, World Development 28, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., 1997, ‘Good and Bad Growth: The Human Development Reports’, World Development 25, 631–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., 1998, Development Economics, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., 1999, ‘Creative Destruction: Source or Symptom of Economic Growth?’, in Z. Acs, B. Carlsson and C. Karlsson (eds.), Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97- 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., 2000, National Panel Study of U. Business Start-Ups: First Annual Overview, Entrepreneurial Research Consortium.

  • Reynolds, P. D., D. Storey and P. Westhead, 1994, ‘Cross- National Comparison of the Variation in New Firm Formation Rates’, Regional Studies 28, 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., B. Miller and W. R. Maki, 1995, ‘Explaining Regional Variation in Business Births and Deaths – Us 1976–1988’, Small Business Economics 7, 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. and S. B. White, 1997, The Entrepreneurial Process. Economic Growth, Men, Women, and Minorities, Quorum Books.

  • Reynolds, P. D., M. Hay and S. M. Camps, 1999, ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – 1999 Executive Report’, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

  • Reynolds, P. D., S. M. Camps, W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio and M. Hay, 2001, ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – 2001 Executive Report’, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

  • Rodriguez-Pose, A., 2001, ‘Local Production Systems and Economic Performance in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom’, in C. Crouch, P. Le Gales, C. Trigilia and H. Voelzkow (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelandt, T. J. A. and P. Hertog, 1999, ‘Cluster Analysis and Cluster-based Policy Making: An Introduction to the Theme’, in OECD (ed.), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Chapter 1, Paris: OECD]

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelandt, T. J. A., P. Hertog, J. van Sinderen and N. van den Hove, 1999, ‘Cluster Analysis and Cluster Policy in the Netherlands’, in OECD (ed.), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Chapter 13, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, S., 1997, ‘Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstream of Economic Development’, European Planning Studies 5, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P., 1986, ‘Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, Ch. and J. Zeitlin, 1985, ‘Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in Nineteenth-century Industrialization’, Past and Present 108, 133–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A., 1994, Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1950, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd edn, New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K., M. Porter and J. Sachs, 2001, The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., 1988, New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe, London: Pion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. and M. Storper, 1992, ‘Industrialization and Regional Development’, in M. Storper and A. J. Scott (eds.), London: Routledge, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1990, ‘Development as Capability Expansion’, in K. Griffin and J. E. Knight (eds.), Human Development and the International Strategy for the 1990s, Chapter 2, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1999, Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1997, ‘Development Thinking at the Beginning of the 21st Century’, Development Economics Research Programme, STICERD, LSE.

  • Sforzi, F., 1990, ‘The Quantitative Importance of Marshallian Industrial Districts in the Italian Economy’, in F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Geneva: International Labor Organization, pp. 75–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. and S. Venkataraman, 2000, ‘The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research’, Academy of Management Review 25, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R. A. and B. C. Straits, 1999, Approaches to Social Research, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., 1999 (1776), The Wealth of Nations, Middlesex, England: Peguin Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M., 1957, ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 312–320.

  • Sorenson, O. and P. G. Audia, 2000, ‘The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Activity: Geographic Concentration of Footwear Production in the United States, 1940–1989’, American Journal of Sociology 106, 424–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, T. M., N. M. Carter, P. D. Reynolds and M. L. Williams, 1995, ‘New Firm Survival – Industry, Strategy, and Location’, Journal of Business Venturing 10, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, M., 1998, Clusters and Regional Specialisation, London: Pion Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, E., 1991, ‘The Sectoral Cluster in Economic Development Policy: Lessons from Rochester and Buffalo’, Economic Development Quarterly 5(4), 342–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., 2001, ‘New Firms, Regional Development and the Cluster Approach – What Can Technology Policies Achieve?’, Kiel Institute International Workshop on Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition, 1–32.

  • Storper, M., 1997, The Regional World, New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. and Y. Chen, 2000, ‘The Effects of Globalization on the Location of Industries in the OECD and European Union’ (submitted to) The Journal of Economic Geography.

  • Storper, M. and A. J. Scott, 1989, ‘The Geographical Foundations and Social Regulation of Flexible Production Complexes’, in J. Wolch and M. E. Dear (eds.), The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life, Unwin Hyman, pp. 25–43.

  • Thornton, P. H., 1999, ‘The Sociology of Entrepreneurship’, Annual Review of Sociology 25, 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, M., 2000, Economic Development, 7th edn, Essex, England: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. and L. Rosenkopf, 1992, ‘Organizational Determinants of Technological-Change – Toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution’, Research in Organizational Behavior 14, 311–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, 2000, What is Economic Development, U.S. Department of Commerce website.

  • UNDP – United Nations Program for Development, 1992, Human Development Report 1992, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • UNIDO – United Nation Industrial Development Organization, 2001, Development of Clusters and Networks of SMEs – The UNIDO Programme, Vienna: UNIDO.

  • Van Dijk, M. P. and R. Rabellotti, 1997, Enterprise Clusters and Networks in Developing Countries, London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., S. Wennekers, D. Audretsch and R. Thurik, 2001, An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship: Policies, Institutions, and Culture, Zoetermeer: EIM Business and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, E., 1999, ‘A Comparison of Clustered and Dispersed Firms in the Small-Scale Clothing Industry of Lima’, World Development 27, 1553–1570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J., 1995, ‘Dynamics of Organizational Communities and Technological Bandwagons – an Empirical- Investigation of Community Evolution in the Microprocessor Market’, Strategic Management Journal 16, 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. W., 1988, Regional Cultures, Managerial Behaviour, and Entrepreneurship. An International Perspective, New York: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S. and R. Thurik, 2001, ‘Institutions, Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance’, Unpublished Work – EIM Business and Policy Research, 1–19.

  • Wennekers, S. and R. Thurik, 1999, ‘Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth’, Small Business Economics, 27–55.

  • World Bank, 1991, World Development Report 1991, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • World Bank, 1997, World Development Report 1997 – The State in a Changing World, Oxford University Press.

  • World Bank, 2000, Electronic Conference on Clusters.

  • Zeitlin, J., 1992, ‘Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration: Overview and Comment’, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and J. Armstrong, 1998, ‘Geographically Localized Knowledge: Spillovers or Markets?’, Economic Inquiry 36, 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and M. B. Brewer, 1998, ‘Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of Us Biotechnology Enterprises’, American Economic Review 88, 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hector O. Rocha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rocha, H.O. Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters. Small Bus Econ 23, 363–400 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-3991-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-3991-8

Keywords

Navigation