Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 363–400 | Cite as

Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters

  • Hector O. Rocha
Article

Abstract

Defining entrepreneurship as the creation of new organisations,this paper explores,from a literature review standpoint,the moderating effect of clusters on the impact of entrepreneurship on development. To identify potential causes of this moderating effect, the paper focuses on three different impacts: entrepreneurship on development, clusters on development,and clusters on entrepreneurship. The findings of the paper are threefold.First,entrepreneurship is positively associated with economic growth.Given the importance of entrepreneurship in changing the economic and social structure of the economy,more research on the impact of entrepreneurship on development - i.e. focus on capabilities rather than on output - is needed. Second,it is difficult to reach empirical generalisations on the impact of clusters on development and entrepreneurship given conceptual and methodological constraints. Both positive results and caveats are found at different levels of analysis and at different stages of development of a cluster. Finally, given the previous finding, it is difficult to generalise on the impact of clusters on the association between entrepreneurship and development. Consensus on and validity between conceptual and operational definitions of clusters; consideration of context as well as process and, therefore, quantitative and qualitative methods; and differentiation between levels of analysis controlling for cluster stage and strength are the main criteria for future studies to consider to disentangle the impact of clusters on entrepreneurship, development and the association between entrepreneurship and development.

Keywords

Future Study Positive Result Social Structure Qualitative Method Industrial Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghion, P. and J. Williamson, 1998, Growth, Inequality and Growth: Theory, History and Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H. E., 1999, Organizations Evolving, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. E. and M. A. Martinez, ‘Many are Called, But Few Are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the Study of Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25, 41–56.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, T. and A. Thomas, 2000, Poverty and Development into the 21st Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Amin, A., 2000, ‘Industrial Districts’, in E. Sheppard and T. J. Barnes (eds.), A Companion to Economic Geography, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., pp. 149–168.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, H. and J. Taylor, 2000, Regional Economics and Policy, 3rd edn, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Arthur, W. B., 1989, ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events’, Economic Journal 99, 116–131.Google Scholar
  8. Arthur, W. B., 1990, ‘Silicon Valley Locational Clusters - When Do Increasing Returns Imply Monopoly’, Mathematical Social Sciences 19, 235–251.Google Scholar
  9. Arzeni, S. and J. Pellegrin, 1997, ‘Entrepreneurship and Local Development’, The OECD Observer 204, 27–29.Google Scholar
  10. Arzeni, S., 1998, ‘Entrepreneurship and Job Creation’, The OECD Observer, December/January, 18–20.Google Scholar
  11. Asheim, B., 1997, ‘ “Learning Regions” in a Globalised World Economy: Towards a New Competitive Advantage of Industrial Districts?’, in S. Conti and M. Taylor (eds.), Interdependent and Uneven Development: Global-Local Perspectives, London: Avebury, pp. 143–176.Google Scholar
  12. Asheim, B. T., 2000, ‘Industrial Districts: The Contributions of Marshall and Beyond’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 413–431.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., 1998, ‘Agglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14, 18–29.Google Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B., 2000, ‘Corporate Form and Spatial Form’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 333–347.Google Scholar
  15. Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman, 1996, ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, American Economic Review 86, 630–640.Google Scholar
  16. Audretsch, D. B. and P. E. Stephan, 1996, ‘Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology’, American Economic Review 86, 641–652.Google Scholar
  17. Audretsch, D. B. M. Fritsch, 2000, Growth Regimes over Time and Space.Google Scholar
  18. Audretsch, D. B. and M. Fritsch, 2000, Growth Regimes over Time and Space. Audretsch, D. B. and A. R. Thurik, 2000, ‘Capitalism and Democracy in the 21st Century: From the Managed to the Entrepreneurial Economy’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10, 17–34.Google Scholar
  19. Austrian, Z., 2000, ‘Cluster Case Studies: the Marriage of Quantitative and Qualitative Information for Action’, Economic Development Quarterly 14, 97–110.Google Scholar
  20. Aydalot, P. (ed.), 1986, Milieux Innovateurs en Europe, Paris: GREMI.Google Scholar
  21. Baptista, R. and P. Swann, 1998, ‘Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More?’, Research Policy 27, 525–540.Google Scholar
  22. Baptista, R. and G. M. P. Swann, 1999, ‘A Comparison of Clustering Dynamics in the US and UK Computer Industries’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9, 373–399.Google Scholar
  23. Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin, 1995, Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Baum, J. A. C. and S. J. Mezias, 1992, ‘Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1990’, Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 580–604.Google Scholar
  25. Baum, J. A. C. and C. Oliver, 1996, ‘Toward an Institutional Ecology of Organizational Founding’, Academy of Management Journal 39, 1378–1427.Google Scholar
  26. Baum, J. A. C. and H. A. Haveman, 1997, ‘Love Thy Neighbor? Differentiation and Agglomeration in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1990’, Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 304–338.Google Scholar
  27. Baumol, W. J., 1968, ‘Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory’, American Economic Review, 64–71.Google Scholar
  28. Baumol, W. J., 1990, ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’, Journal of Political Economy, 893–921Google Scholar
  29. Becattini, G., 1979, ‘Dal “settore industriale” al “distretto industriale” . Alcune considerazioni sull’ unita d’indagine del’economia industriale’, cited in G. L. Becattini (ed.), Sectors and/or Districts: Some Remarks on the Conceptual Foundations of Industrial Economics, Rivista di Economia e Politica Industriale, pp. 123–135.Google Scholar
  30. Becattini, G., 1989, ‘Sectors and/or Districts: Some Remarks on the Conceptual Foundations of Industrial Economics’, in E. Goodman et al. (ed.), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, London: Routledge, pp. 123–135.Google Scholar
  31. Becattini, G., 1990, ‘The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion’, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
  32. Bechard, J., 1994, ‘Understanding the Field of Entrepreneurship: A Synthesis of the Most Often Quoted Contributions’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.Google Scholar
  33. Bergman, E. M. and E. J. Feser, 1999, Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications, WebBooks.Google Scholar
  34. Birch, D. A., 1981, ‘Who Creates Jobs?’, The Public Interest, 3–14.Google Scholar
  35. Brock, W. A. E. D. S., 1989, ‘Small Business Economics’, Small Business Economics 1, 7–20.Google Scholar
  36. Brusco, S., 1992, ‘Small Firms and the Provision of Real Services’, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  37. Bygrave, W. D. and C. W. Hofer, 1991, ‘Theorizing About Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 16, 13–22.Google Scholar
  38. Camagni, R., 1991, ‘“Local Milieu”, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Towards a New Dynamic Theory of Economic Space’, in Camagni (ed.), London: Belhaven Press, pp. 121–143.Google Scholar
  39. Capello, R., 1996, ‘Industrial Enterprises and Economic Space: the Network Paradigm’, European Planning Studies 4, 485–506.Google Scholar
  40. Carroll, G. R. and J. Wade, 1991, ‘Density Dependence in the Organizational Evolution of the American Brewing Industry Across Different Levels of Analysis’, Social Science Research 20, 271–302.Google Scholar
  41. Castells, M., 2000, The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Ceglie, G. and M. Dini, 1999, ‘SMEs Cluster and Network Development in Developing Countries: The Experience of UNIDO’, UNIDO - Private Sector Development Branch, Working Paper No. 2, 1–25.Google Scholar
  43. Chinitz, B., 1961, ‘Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburg’, American Economic Review 51, 363–374.Google Scholar
  44. Chandler, G. N. and D. W. Lyon, ‘Issues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The Past Decade’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 25(4), 101–113.Google Scholar
  45. Coates, D., 2000, Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  46. Coleman, J., 1988, Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Conti, S., E. Malecki and P. E. Oinas, 1995, The Industrial Enterprise and its Environment: Spatial Perspective, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  48. Cooper, A. C., J. A. Hornaday and K. H. Vesper, 1997, ‘The Field of Entrepreneurship Over Time’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.Google Scholar
  49. Cosentino, F., F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger, 1996, Local and Regional Response to Global Pressure: The Case of Italy and its Industrial Districts, Research Series 103, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  50. Cowen, M. P. and R. W. Shenton, 1996, Doctrines of Development, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Crouch, C., P. Le Gales, C. Trigilia and H. Voelzkow, 2001, Local Production Systems in Europe. Rise or Demise? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Cullen, J., 1998, ‘Promoting Competitiveness for Small Business Clusters through Collaborative Learning: Policy Consequences from an European Perspective’, in M. Steiner (ed.), London: Pion Ltd., pp. 238–253.Google Scholar
  53. Czamanski, D. and S. Czamanski, 1977, ‘Industrial Complexes: Their Typology, Structure, and Relation to Economic Development’, Papers of the Regional Science Association 38, 93–111.Google Scholar
  54. Czamanski, D. and L. A. de Ablas, 1979, ‘Identification of Industrial Clusters and Complexes: A Comparison of Methods and Findings’, Urban Studies 16, 61–80.Google Scholar
  55. Davidsson, P., M. B. Low and M. Wright, 2001, ‘Editor’s Introduction: Low and MacMillan Ten Years On: Achievements and Future Directions for Entrepreneurship Research’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 25(4), 5–16.Google Scholar
  56. DeBresson, Ch. and X. Hu, 1999, ‘Identifying Clusters of Innovative Activity: A New Approach and a Toolbox’, in OECD (ed.), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Chapter 2, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  57. Debru, E. and F. Saget, 1999, Identification des operateurs dans le cadre des Systemes Productifs Localises en France - Rapport final (Identification of the operators in the frame of the Local Productive Systems in France - Final Report). Tecsa Consultant.Google Scholar
  58. Department of the Environment, T.a.t.R., 1997, Sustainable Communities for the 21st Century, London: HSMO.Google Scholar
  59. DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell, 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48, 147–160.Google Scholar
  60. Doeringer. P. B and D. G. Terkla, 1999, ‘Business Strategy and Cross-Industry Clusters’, in J. P. Blair and L. A. Reese (eds.), Approaches to Economic Development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., pp. 96–109.Google Scholar
  61. Doty, D. H. and W. H. Glick, 1994, ‘Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building - Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling’, Academy of Management Review 19, 230–251.Google Scholar
  62. DTI - Department of Trade and Industry UK, 2001, Business Clusters in the UK - A First Assessment, London: Department of Trade and Industry - UK.Google Scholar
  63. Dunning, J. H., 1998, Regions, Globalization and the Knowledge Economy: The Issues Stated, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Enright, M., 2001, ‘Regional Clusters: What We Know and What We Should Know’, Kiel Institute International Workshop on Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition, 1–28.Google Scholar
  65. Enright, M. and I. Fflowcs-Williams, 2001, ‘Local Partnership, Clusters and SME Globalization’, in OECD (ed.), Paris: OECD, pp. 115–150.Google Scholar
  66. Fabiani et al., 2000, ‘L’efficienza delle imprese nei distretti industriali Italiani’, in F. Signorini (ed.), Rome: Meridiana Libri, Corigliano Calabro (CS), pp. 21–49.Google Scholar
  67. Feldman, M., 2000, ‘Location and Innovation: The New Economic Geography of Innovation, Spillovers, and Agglomeration’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 373–394.Google Scholar
  68. Feldman, M. P., 1994, The Geography of Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Feser, E. J., 1998, ‘Old and New Theories of Industry Clusters’, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, London: Pion Ltd., pp. 18–40.Google Scholar
  70. Feser, E. J. and E. M. Bergman, 2000, ‘National Industry Cluster Templates: A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis’, Regional Studies.Google Scholar
  71. Fine, B., 2000, ‘Endogenous Growth Theory: A Critical Assessment’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 24, 245–265.Google Scholar
  72. Florida, R. and M. Keeney, 1990, The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America’s Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  73. Freeman, C., 1987, Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Printer Publishers.Google Scholar
  74. Garofoli, G., 1992, Endogenous Development in Southern Europe, Averbury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  75. Gartner, W. B., 1989, ‘ “Who is an Entrepreneur?” is the Wrong Question’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 13, 47–68.Google Scholar
  76. Glaeser, E. L., H. D. Kallal, J. A. Scheinkman and A. Shleifer, 1992, ‘Growth in Cities’, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152.Google Scholar
  77. Glasmeier, A., 1994, ‘Flexible Districts, Flexible Regions? The Institutional and Cultural Limits to Districts in an Era of Globalisation and Technological Paradigm Shifts’, in A. Amin and N. Thrift (eds.), Globalisation, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, Chapter 6 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Glassman, U. and H. Voelzkow, 2001, ‘The Governance of Local Economies in Germany’, in C. Crouch, P. Le Gales, C. Trigilia and H. Voelzkow (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–116.Google Scholar
  79. Gordon, I. and P. McCann, 2000, ‘Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?’, Urban Studies 37, 513–532.Google Scholar
  80. Grabher, G., 1993, The Embedded Firm, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  81. Granovetter, M., 1985, ‘Economic-Action and Social-Structure - the Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510.Google Scholar
  82. Hannan, M. T. and G. R. Carroll, 1992, Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Hannan, M. T. and J. Freeman, 1989, Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Harrison, B., 1992, ‘Industrial Districts - Old Wine in New Bottles’, Regional Studies 26, 469–483.Google Scholar
  85. Harrrison, B., 1994, Lean and Mean, New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  86. Held, D., A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt and J. Perraton, 1999, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  87. Hollingsworth, J. R., 1997, ‘Continuities and Changes in Social Systems of Production: The Cases of Japan, Germany, and United States’, in J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddedness of Institutions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–310.Google Scholar
  88. Hoover, E., 1937, Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Ingram, P. and P. W. Roberts, 2000, ‘Friendships Among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry’, American Journal of Sociology 106, 387–423.Google Scholar
  90. Isard, W., 1956, Location and Space-Economy, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  91. Jaffe, A. B., 1989, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 79, 957–970.Google Scholar
  92. Keeble, D. and F. Wilkinson, 2000, High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  93. Kent, C. A., 1982, ‘Entrepreneurship in Economic Development’, in C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton and K. H. Vesper (eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
  94. Kirzner, I. M., 1982, ‘The Theory of Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth’, in C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton and K. H. Vesper (eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 272–277.Google Scholar
  95. Klepper, S., 1996, ‘Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation Over the Product Life Cycle’, American Economic Review 86, 562–583.Google Scholar
  96. Krugman, P., 1991, Trade and Geography, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  97. Krugman, P., 1998, ‘What’s New in the New Economic Geography?’, Oxford Review of Economics Policy 14, 7–17.Google Scholar
  98. Krugman, P., 2000, ‘Where in the World is the New Economic Geography’, in G. L. Clark, M. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar
  99. Lichty, R. W. and K. R. Knudsen, 1999, ‘Measuring Regional Economic Base’, Economic Development Review, 47–52.Google Scholar
  100. Liebeskind, J., A. L. Oliver, L. Zucker and M. Brewer, 1996, ‘Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms’, Organization Science 7, 428–514.Google Scholar
  101. Livesay, H. C., 1982, ‘Entrepreneurial History’, in C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton and K. H. Vesper (eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
  102. Lomi, A., 2000, ‘Density Dependence and Spatial Duality in Organizational Founding Rates: Danish Commercial Banks, 1846–1989’, Organization Studies 21, 433–461.Google Scholar
  103. Lomi, A., 1995, ‘The Population Ecology of Organizational Founding - Location Dependence and Unobserved Heterogeneity’, Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 111–144.Google Scholar
  104. Longhi, C. and D. Keeble, 2000, ‘High-Technology Clusters and Evolutionary Trends in the 1990s’, in D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson (eds.), Aldershot, England: Ashgate, pp. 21–56.Google Scholar
  105. Low, M. B. and I. C. MacMillan, 1988, ‘Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges’, Journal of Management 14, 139–161.Google Scholar
  106. Lucas, R., 1988, ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42.Google Scholar
  107. Lundvall, B.-A., 1992, National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  108. Lundvall, B.-A. and S. Borras, 1998, The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  109. Lundvall, B.-A. and B. Johnson, 1994, ‘The Learning Economy’, Journal of Industry Studies 1, 23–41.Google Scholar
  110. Lundvall, B.-A. and P. Maskell, 2000, ‘Nation States and Economic Development: From National Systems of Production to National Systems of Knowledge Creation and Learning’, in G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman and M. S. Gertler (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 353–372.Google Scholar
  111. Maillat, D., 1996, ‘Regional Productive Systems and Innovative Millieux’, in OECD (ed.), Networks of Enterprises and Local Development, Chapter 3, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  112. Malecki, E. J., 1994, ‘Entrepreneurship in Regional and Local Development’, International Regional Science Review 16, 119–153.Google Scholar
  113. Malmberg, A. and P. Maskell, 1997, ‘Towards and Explanation of Regional Specialization and Industry Agglomeration’, European Planning Studies 5(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  114. Markusen, A., 1996, ‘Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts’, Economic Geography 72, 293–313.Google Scholar
  115. Marshall, A., 1966 (1890), Principles of Economics, 8th edn, London: Mcmillan.Google Scholar
  116. Martin, R. and P. Sunley, 2002, Deconstructing Clusters: Chaotic Concept of Policy Panacea. 1–60. Paper presented at High Technology Small Firms One-Day Cluster Conference, organised by Manchester Business School and the Small Business Service.Google Scholar
  117. Morris, A., 1998, Geography and Development, London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  118. Nadvi, 1995, ‘Industrial Clusters and Networks: Case Studies of SME Growth and Innovation’, UNIDO, 1–78.Google Scholar
  119. Nelson, A. C., 1993, ‘Theories of Regional Development’, in R. D. Bingham and R. Mier (eds.), Theories of Local Economic Development. Perspectives from Across the Disciplines, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  120. Nohria, N., 1996, ‘From the M-Form to the N-Form: Taking Stock of Changes in the Large Industrial Corporation’, London Business School Working Paper SLRP WP16/1996.Google Scholar
  121. Nohria, N., 1992, ‘Is a Network Perspective a Useful Way of Studying Organizations’, in N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations, Chapter 1, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Nohria, N. and R. G. Eccles, 1992, Networks and Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  123. Oakey, R. P., 1995, High-Technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth, London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  124. Observatory of European SMEs, 2002, Regional Clusters in Europe. 3. Belgium: Enterprise Publications, European Commission, pp. 1–66.Google Scholar
  125. OECD, 1996a, Networks of Enterprises and Local Economic Development, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  126. OECD, 1996b, SMEs: Employment, Innovation and Growth: The Washington Workshop, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  127. OECD, 1998, Fostering Entrepreneurship, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  128. OECD, 1999, Boosting Innovation - The Cluster Approach, Paris: OECD Proceedings.Google Scholar
  129. OECD, 2000, ‘Local Development and Job Creation’, OECD Observer - Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  130. OECD, 2001a, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  131. OECD, 2001b, World Congress on Local Clusters - Proceedings, Paris, France: OECD - DATAR.Google Scholar
  132. OECD, 2002, International Conference on Territorial Development: Local Clusters, Restructuring Territories, and Environment-Enterprises-Districts, Paris, France: OECD - DATAR.Google Scholar
  133. Patel, P. and K. Pavitt, 1991, ‘Large Firms in the Production of the World’s Technology: An Important Case of Non- Globalization’, Journal of International Business Studies, 1–21.Google Scholar
  134. Peneder, M., 1995, ‘Cluster Techniques as a Method to Analyze Industrial Competitiveness’, International Advances in Economic Research 1, 295–304.Google Scholar
  135. Piore, M. J. and Ch. F. Sabel, 1984, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  136. Polanyi, K., 1944, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  137. Polanyi, M., 1967, The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  138. Porter, M. E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  139. Porter, M. E., 1996, ‘Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies, and Regional Policy’, International Regional Science Review 19, 85–90.Google Scholar
  140. Porter, M. E., 1998, On Competition, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 197–288.Google Scholar
  141. Porter, M. E., 2000 Feb, ‘Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy’, Economic Development Quarterly 14, 15–34.Google Scholar
  142. Porter, M. E., 2001, ‘Enhancing the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: The Current Competitiveness Index’, in K. Schwab, M. Porter and J. Sachs (eds.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–73.Google Scholar
  143. Porter, M. E., Monitor Group, ontheFRONTIER and Council on Competitiveness, 2001, Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of U.S. Competitiveness, Washington, DC: Council of Competitiveness.Google Scholar
  144. Porter, M. E., J. Sachs and S. Warner, 2000, ‘Executive Summary’, in K. Schwab, M. Porter, J. Sachs et al. (eds.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2000, World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  145. Pouder, R. and C. H. St. John, 1996, ‘Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation’, Academy of Management Review 21, 1192–1225.Google Scholar
  146. Powell, W. W., 1990, ‘Neither Market Nor Hierarchy - Network Forms of Organization’, Research in Organizational Behavior 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  147. Prahalad, C. K. and R. A. Bettis, 1986, ‘The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance’, Strategic Management Journal 7, 485–501.Google Scholar
  148. Putnam, R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Pyke, F., G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger, 1992, Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  150. Pyke, F. and W. Sengenberger, 1992, Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  151. Rabellotti, R., 1995, ‘Is There an Industrial District Model - Footwear Districts in Italy and Mexico Compared’, World Development 23, 29–41.Google Scholar
  152. Rabellotti, R. and H. Schmitz, 1999, ‘The Internal Heterogeneity of Industrial Districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico’, Regional Studies 33, 97–108.Google Scholar
  153. Raco, M., 2000, ‘Competition, Collaboration and the New Industrial Districts: Examining the Institutional Turn in Local Economic Development’, Urban Studies 36, 951–968.Google Scholar
  154. Rallet, A. and A. Torre, 1998, ‘On Geography and Technology: Proximity Relations in Localised Innovation Networks’, In M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, London: Pion Ltd., pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
  155. Ranis, G., F. Stewart and A. Ramirez, 2000, ‘Economic Growth and Human Development’, World Development 28, 197–219.Google Scholar
  156. Ravallion, M., 1997, ‘Good and Bad Growth: The Human Development Reports’, World Development 25, 631–638.Google Scholar
  157. Ray, D., 1998, Development Economics, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  158. Reynolds, P. D., 1999, ‘Creative Destruction: Source or Symptom of Economic Growth?’, in Z. Acs, B. Carlsson and C. Karlsson (eds.), Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97- 136.Google Scholar
  159. Reynolds, P. D., 2000, National Panel Study of U. Business Start-Ups: First Annual Overview, Entrepreneurial Research Consortium.Google Scholar
  160. Reynolds, P. D., D. Storey and P. Westhead, 1994, ‘Cross- National Comparison of the Variation in New Firm Formation Rates’, Regional Studies 28, 443–456.Google Scholar
  161. Reynolds, P. D., B. Miller and W. R. Maki, 1995, ‘Explaining Regional Variation in Business Births and Deaths – Us 1976–1988’, Small Business Economics 7, 389–407.Google Scholar
  162. Reynolds, P. D. and S. B. White, 1997, The Entrepreneurial Process. Economic Growth, Men, Women, and Minorities, Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  163. Reynolds, P. D., M. Hay and S. M. Camps, 1999, ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – 1999 Executive Report’, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  164. Reynolds, P. D., S. M. Camps, W. D. Bygrave, E. Autio and M. Hay, 2001, ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – 2001 Executive Report’, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  165. Rodriguez-Pose, A., 2001, ‘Local Production Systems and Economic Performance in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom’, in C. Crouch, P. Le Gales, C. Trigilia and H. Voelzkow (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar
  166. Roelandt, T. J. A. and P. Hertog, 1999, ‘Cluster Analysis and Cluster-based Policy Making: An Introduction to the Theme’, in OECD (ed.), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Chapter 1, Paris: OECD]Google Scholar
  167. Roelandt, T. J. A., P. Hertog, J. van Sinderen and N. van den Hove, 1999, ‘Cluster Analysis and Cluster Policy in the Netherlands’, in OECD (ed.), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Chapter 13, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  168. Rosenfeld, S., 1997, ‘Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstream of Economic Development’, European Planning Studies 5, 3–23.Google Scholar
  169. Romer, P., 1986, ‘Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–1037.Google Scholar
  170. Sabel, Ch. and J. Zeitlin, 1985, ‘Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in Nineteenth-century Industrialization’, Past and Present 108, 133–176.Google Scholar
  171. Saxenian, A., 1994, Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  172. Schumpeter, J. A., 1950, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd edn, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  173. Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  174. Schwab, K., M. Porter and J. Sachs, 2001, The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  175. Scott, A., 1988, New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe, London: Pion Press.Google Scholar
  176. Scott, A. J. and M. Storper, 1992, ‘Industrialization and Regional Development’, in M. Storper and A. J. Scott (eds.), London: Routledge, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  177. Sen, A., 1990, ‘Development as Capability Expansion’, in K. Griffin and J. E. Knight (eds.), Human Development and the International Strategy for the 1990s, Chapter 2, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  178. Sen, A., 1999, Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  179. Sen, A., 1997, ‘Development Thinking at the Beginning of the 21st Century’, Development Economics Research Programme, STICERD, LSE.Google Scholar
  180. Sforzi, F., 1990, ‘The Quantitative Importance of Marshallian Industrial Districts in the Italian Economy’, in F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Geneva: International Labor Organization, pp. 75–107.Google Scholar
  181. Shane, S. and S. Venkataraman, 2000, ‘The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research’, Academy of Management Review 25, 217–226.Google Scholar
  182. Singleton, R. A. and B. C. Straits, 1999, Approaches to Social Research, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  183. Smith, A., 1999 (1776), The Wealth of Nations, Middlesex, England: Peguin Basic Books.Google Scholar
  184. Solow, R. M., 1957, ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 312–320.Google Scholar
  185. Sorenson, O. and P. G. Audia, 2000, ‘The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Activity: Geographic Concentration of Footwear Production in the United States, 1940–1989’, American Journal of Sociology 106, 424–461.Google Scholar
  186. Stearns, T. M., N. M. Carter, P. D. Reynolds and M. L. Williams, 1995, ‘New Firm Survival – Industry, Strategy, and Location’, Journal of Business Venturing 10, 23–42.Google Scholar
  187. Steiner, M., 1998, Clusters and Regional Specialisation, London: Pion Ltd.Google Scholar
  188. Sternberg, E., 1991, ‘The Sectoral Cluster in Economic Development Policy: Lessons from Rochester and Buffalo’, Economic Development Quarterly 5(4), 342–356.Google Scholar
  189. Sternberg, R., 2001, ‘New Firms, Regional Development and the Cluster Approach – What Can Technology Policies Achieve?’, Kiel Institute International Workshop on Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition, 1–32.Google Scholar
  190. Storper, M., 1997, The Regional World, New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  191. Storper, M. and Y. Chen, 2000, ‘The Effects of Globalization on the Location of Industries in the OECD and European Union’ (submitted to) The Journal of Economic Geography.Google Scholar
  192. Storper, M. and A. J. Scott, 1989, ‘The Geographical Foundations and Social Regulation of Flexible Production Complexes’, in J. Wolch and M. E. Dear (eds.), The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life, Unwin Hyman, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
  193. Thornton, P. H., 1999, ‘The Sociology of Entrepreneurship’, Annual Review of Sociology 25, 19–46.Google Scholar
  194. Todaro, M., 2000, Economic Development, 7th edn, Essex, England: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  195. Tushman, M. L. and L. Rosenkopf, 1992, ‘Organizational Determinants of Technological-Change – Toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution’, Research in Organizational Behavior 14, 311–347.Google Scholar
  196. U.S. Department of Commerce, 2000, What is Economic Development, U.S. Department of Commerce website.Google Scholar
  197. UNDP – United Nations Program for Development, 1992, Human Development Report 1992, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  198. UNIDO – United Nation Industrial Development Organization, 2001, Development of Clusters and Networks of SMEs – The UNIDO Programme, Vienna: UNIDO.Google Scholar
  199. Van Dijk, M. P. and R. Rabellotti, 1997, Enterprise Clusters and Networks in Developing Countries, London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  200. Verheul, I., S. Wennekers, D. Audretsch and R. Thurik, 2001, An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship: Policies, Institutions, and Culture, Zoetermeer: EIM Business and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  201. Visser, E., 1999, ‘A Comparison of Clustered and Dispersed Firms in the Small-Scale Clothing Industry of Lima’, World Development 27, 1553–1570.Google Scholar
  202. Wade, J., 1995, ‘Dynamics of Organizational Communities and Technological Bandwagons – an Empirical- Investigation of Community Evolution in the Microprocessor Market’, Strategic Management Journal 16, 111–133.Google Scholar
  203. Weiss, J. W., 1988, Regional Cultures, Managerial Behaviour, and Entrepreneurship. An International Perspective, New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  204. Wennekers, S. and R. Thurik, 2001, ‘Institutions, Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance’, Unpublished Work – EIM Business and Policy Research, 1–19.Google Scholar
  205. Wennekers, S. and R. Thurik, 1999, ‘Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth’, Small Business Economics, 27–55.Google Scholar
  206. World Bank, 1991, World Development Report 1991, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  207. World Bank, 1997, World Development Report 1997 – The State in a Changing World, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  208. World Bank, 2000, Electronic Conference on Clusters.Google Scholar
  209. Zeitlin, J., 1992, ‘Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration: Overview and Comment’, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 279–294.Google Scholar
  210. Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and J. Armstrong, 1998, ‘Geographically Localized Knowledge: Spillovers or Markets?’, Economic Inquiry 36, 65–86.Google Scholar
  211. Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and M. B. Brewer, 1998, ‘Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of Us Biotechnology Enterprises’, American Economic Review 88, 290–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London Business SchoolRegent’s ParkUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations