Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

If universal basic income is the answer, what is the question?

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universal basic income (UBI) has become the rallying cry for a growing international movement seeking redistribution and equality through direct cash payments by governments to all its citizens. Advocates have promoted UBI on multiple grounds: efficiency, equality, as an alternative to traditional anti-poverty aid programs in very poor countries, or even as the foundation for small “c” communist societies. Numerous small-scale experiments of cash transfers have been conducted across the globe purporting to test UBI’s plausibility. In this essay, I explore the multiple agendas of UBI, and consider whether recent scholarship suggests that it might provide a superior path to achieving the historical goals of the political left than that of social democracy and contemporary welfare states. I also raise questions about the political foundations of a movement seeking to end mandatory work, while noting the future possibility of massive job losses that might alter the social, economic, and political possibilities for UBI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This, of course, is the source of its appeal to libertarians such as Milton Friedman (1979) and Murray (2006), who have been explicit in their advocacy of UBI-type schemes. For these authors, UBI would replace all other social obligations to the poor.

  2. The basic income symposium in Theory and Society appeared in.

  3. For more on these limits, an important discussion is provided by Jackson (2020).

  4. Steensland (2007) provides the definitive historical account of the remarkable rise and fall of the Family Assistance Plan.

  5. My argument on this question is presented in joint work with sociologist Clem Brooks; see Brooks and Manza 2007.

  6. Some examples: Hughes 2018; Yang, 2018; Kroll, 2020.

References

  • Brooks, C., & Manza J. (2007). Why Welfare States Persist (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007

  • Friedman, M., & with Rose Friedman. (1979). Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. (2018). Fair Shot: Rethinking Inequality and How We Earn. New York: St. Martin’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2020). Manifesto for a Dream: Inequality, Constraint, and Radical Reform. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, A. (2020). “Twitter’s Jack Dorsey is Giving Andrew Yang $5 Million to Build the Case for Universal Basic Income.” Rolling Stone May 21. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/twitter-jack-dorsey-andrew-yang-coronavirus-covid-universal-basic-income-1003365/

  • Murray, C. (2006). Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State. Washington D.C.: AEI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, B. (2007). The Failed Welfare Revolution: America’s Struggle Over Guaranteed Income Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, A. (2018). The War on Normal People: The Truth About America’s Disappearing Jobs and Why Universal Basic Income is Our Future. New York: Hachette Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, David. 2018. Bullshit Jobs: A Theory. New York: Simon and Shuster.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to my colleagues Sarah Cowan, David Garland, and Caitlin Zaloom, and Karen Lucas and the editors of Theory and Society, for their comments on an earlier draft of this essay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff Manza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest or external funding.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manza, J. If universal basic income is the answer, what is the question?. Theor Soc 52, 625–639 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09490-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09490-4

Keywords

Navigation