Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Educated acquiescence: how academia sustains authoritarianism in China

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a presumed bastion of the Enlightenment values that support a critical intelligentsia, the university is often regarded as both the bedrock and beneficiary of liberal democracy. By contrast, authoritarian regimes are said to discourage higher education out of fear that the growth of a critical intelligentsia could imperil their survival. The case of China, past and present, challenges this conventional wisdom. Imperial China, the most enduring authoritarian political system in world history, thrived in large part precisely because of its sponsorship of a form of higher education closely tied to state interests. Although twentieth-century revolutions brought fundamental change to Chinese politics and pedagogy, the contemporary party-state also actively promotes higher education, cultivating a mutually advantageous state-scholar nexus and thereby reducing the likelihood of intellectual-led opposition. As in the imperial past, authoritarian rule in China today is buttressed by a pattern of educated acquiescence, with academia acceding to political compliance in exchange for the many benefits conferred upon it by the state. The role of educated acquiescence in enabling Chinese authoritarianism highlights the contributions of a cooperative academy to authoritarian durability and raises questions with prevailing assumptions that associate the flourishing of higher education with liberal democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See, for example, Liang (2013), a cadre training textbook, which opens with dozens of examples of successful governance techniques drawn from the Chinese imperial past.

  2. In the late imperial period, literate women, excluded from the examinations, sometimes founded “heterodox” religious sects that could, especially if persecuted by the authorities, turn against the state. But such movements alarmed the gentry, who responded to the perceived threat by mobilizing local militia in opposition (Naquin 1977; Kuhn 1970).

  3. Celebrated examples of individual remonstrators include Qu Yuan (a third century BC official from the state of Chu who committed suicide to protest rampant corruption) and Hai Rui (a sixteenth century Ming Dynasty official who was dismissed, and later reinstated, after criticizing the emperor for dereliction of duty).

  4. Mao describes the impact of “new learning” on his political awakening in Snow (1972)

  5. On the role of intellectual protest in the collapse of European Communism, see for example Joppke (1995); Bozoki (1999); and Garcelon (1997).

  6. The seminal work on the phenomenon of massification is Trow (1973), who distinguishes among “elite” higher education, which enrolls under 15% of the eligible age cohort, “mass” education which enrolls 15–50%, and “universal” education which enrolls over 50%.

  7. Washington Post (February 12, 2012).

  8. The former and current General Secretaries, Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping, are both graduates of Tsinghua, while the current Premier, Li Keqiang, is a Peking University alumnus.

  9. 习近平在北京大学师生座谈会上的讲话(全文) http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2014-5/05/content_2671258.htm

  10. Interview with Party Vice-Secretary for Student Affairs, Tsinghua University (2015).

  11. It could be that students are simply more apt to give answers they believe to be “politically correct,” and that their responses do not reflect their actual views, but in either case their replies indicate an unusually high level of compliance or “educated acquiescence.”

  12. Ministry of Civil Affairs, ed., 2017 Statistical Bulletin of Social Service Development (2017年社会服务发展统计公报). https://zhidao.baidu.com/question/1052864159313028779.html

  13. Application guidelines and lists of state-supported projects can be found at the website of the National Planning Office: http://www.npopss-cn.gov.cn/n/2014/1211/c219469-26187444.html

  14. http://api.ning.com/files/HfvPkwzay-6HhFQwHTEQlzr6S8c9GXy3*vLJQfLzAdkMQPFj1Nd9WS-dAL8FMiMAyGT2MZQXmZyOMdR5YWmPnvoRyKGZHCQx/Top20.png

  15. “Innovations in Higher Education: Singapore at the Competitive Edge,” World Bank Technical Paper, no. 222 (1994).

  16. Taiwan and South Korea did eventually democratize, of course, but their impressive economic takeoffs were engineered by authoritarian regimes that appreciated the instrumental use of higher education for such purposes.

  17. “Kim Il Sung University, Seventy-Year History,” Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, no. 729 (October 2016): 22–29; “Kim Il Sung University Greets its 70th Anniversary,” The Pyongyang Times (October 1, 2016): 2.

  18. http://www.ryongnamsan.edu.kp/univ/intro/history/develop; “University Aims to be World’s Top-class Institute,” The Pyongyang Times (October 1, 2016).

  19. See also Vora (2015).

References

  • Ashton, D., et al. (1999). Education and Training for Development in East Asia. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bays, D. H., & Widmer, E. (Eds.). (2009). China’s Christian colleges: Cross-cultural connections, 1900–1950. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. A. (2015). The China model: Political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda, J., (1927). The Treason of the Intellectuals (New York: WW Norton and company, 1956). First edition.

  • Bozoki, A. (Ed.). (1999). Intellectuals and politics in Central Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, C., (1938). The Anatomy of Revolution, revised ed. (New York: Vintage Books, 1965). First edition.

  • Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Downs, G. W. (2005). Development and Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2011). Defeating authoritarian leaders in Postcommunist countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1997). Neither gods nor emperors: Students and the struggle for democracy in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-l. (1955). The Chinese gentry. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. (2012). Social protest and contentious authoritarianism in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirikov, I. (2016). Do Russian research universities have a secret Mission? A response to Forrat. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(4), 338–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberstadt, N., & Banister, J. (1992). The population of North Korea. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, B. A. (2000). A cultural history of civil examinations in late imperial China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, B. A. (2013). Civil examinations and meritocracy in late Imperial China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esarey, A., (2015). Winning Hearts and Minds? Cadres as Microbloggers in China, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, no. 2: 69–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyal, G. and Buchholz, L., (2010) From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions, Annual Review of Sociology, no. 36: 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J. K., & Goldman, M. (1998). China: A New History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewsmith, J. (2001). China since Tiananmen: The politics of transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrat, N., (2015). The political economy of Russian higher education: Why does Putin support research universities, Post-Soviet Affairs 299–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E. (2014). Insurgency trap: Labor politics in Postsocialist China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcelon, M. (1997). The Estate of Change: The specialist rebellion and the democratic movement in Moscow. Theory and Society, 26, 39–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. (1981). China’s intellectuals: Advise and dissent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, S. and Perry, E.J., (2011). “Embracing Uncertainty: Guerrilla Policy Style and Adaptive Governance in China.” In Mao’s Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China, ed. Sebastian Heilmann and Elizabeth J. Perry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–29.

  • Heurlin, C. (2016). Responsive authoritarianism: Land, protests, and policy making. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M.-s. (2019). Challenging Beijing’s mandate of heaven: Taiwan’s sunflower movement and Hong Kong’s umbrella movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, D. C. (2000). Class Politics in the Information Age. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbig, H., (2014) Shifting Ideologies of Research Funding: The CPC’s National Planning Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, no. 2: 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J., (2015) “Shall we Dance? Welfarist Incorporation and the Politics of State-Labour NGO Relations in China,” China Quarterly.

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1970). Social and institutional dynamics of one-party systems. In S. Huntington & C. Moore (Eds.), Authoritarian politics in modern society: The dynamics of established one-party systems (pp. 3–47). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. W. (March 2015). Seeing like an autocrat: Liberal social engineering in an illiberal state. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (1995). East German dissidents and the revolution of 1989. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabel, J. (April 1996). Towards a theory of intellectuals and politics. Theory and Society, 25(2), 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, J. H. (1962). Political change in underdeveloped countries: Nationalism and communism. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, W. C. (Spring 2014). The Chinese century? The challenges of higher education. Daedalus, 143(3), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, D. (2018). Where the party rules: The rank and file of China’s communist state. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, P. A. (1970). Rebellion and its enemies in late Imperial China: Militarism and social structure, 1796–1868. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman, C. and Owens, L., (2002) “The Sociology of Intellectuals,” Annual Review of Sociology, no. 28: 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2012). Beyond patronage: Violent struggle, ruling party cohesion, and authoritarian durability. Perspectives on Politics, 10(4), 869–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Yanhu, (梁妍慧) ed., (2013) Cases in the Party’s Mass Line Education and Practice Campaign (党的群众路线教育实践活动案例) (Beijing: Central Party School Press).

  • Lipset, S.M., (1959) Some Social Requisites of Democracy, American Political Science Review, no. 53: 69–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, J. G. (1971). China and the Christian Colleges, 1850–1950. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

  • MacFarquhar, R. (1974). The origins of the cultural revolution, Vol.1: Contradictions among the people, 1956–1957. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Susan K., (2013) Serving Society, Repurposing the State: Religious Charity and Resistance in China, The China Journal, no. 70: 48–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvetz, T. (2012). Think tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, D. J. (1977). The concept of man in contemporary China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naquin, S. (1977). Millenarian rebellion in China: The eight trigrams uprising of 1813. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K. J. (Ed.). (2008). Popular protest in China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. J. (2012). Anyuan: Mining China’s revolutionary tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. J. (September 2014a). Citizen contention and campus calm: The paradox of civil Society in Contemporary China. Current History, 211–217.

  • Perry, E. J. (2017). Cultural Governance in Contemporary China: ‘Re-Orienting’ Party Propaganda. In V. Shue & P. M. Thornton (Eds.), To Govern China: Evolving Practices of Power (pp. 29–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E.J., (2014b) “Scaling China’s Ivory Tower,” in Beyond Bibliometrics – Identifying the Best (Alexander von Humboldt Foundation): 26–27.

  • Perry, E. J., & Selden, M. (Eds.). (2010). Chinese society: Change, conflict and resistance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, S. R. (2012). August in the heavenly kingdom: China, the west and the epic story of the Taiping civil war. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawski, E. (1979). Education and popular literacy in Ch’ing China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, R. A. (1998). Freedom’s web: Student activism in an age of cultural diversity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. E. (2018). Censored: Distraction and diversion inside China’s great firewall. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarcz, V. (1986). The Chinese enlightenment: Intellectuals and the legacy of the may fourth movement of 1919. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C., (2019) Chinese academic stopped from teaching after Criticising party leadership, Financial Times (March 25). https://www.ft.com/content/8af0cfdc-4f11-11e9-b401-8d9ef1626294

  • Shepherd, J., (2012) “Asian universities challenge US-UK domination of rankings,” The Guardian (March 15).

  • Shils, E. (December 1989). The Modern University and Liberal democracy. Minerva, 27(4), 425–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, E. (1972). Red star over China. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. (1996). God’s Chinese son: The Taiping heavenly kingdom of Hong Xiuquan. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svolik, M. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. A. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Berkeley: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vora, N. (2015). Is the university universal? Mobile (re)constitutions of American academia in the Gulf Arab states. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 46(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., (2014) Crisis Management, Regime Survival and ‘Guerrilla-Style’ Policy-Making: The 1999 Decision to Radically Expand Higher Education in China, China Journal, no. 71.

  • Wasserstrom, J. N., & Perry, E. J. (Eds.). (1994). Popular protest and political culture in modern China. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. C. (2014). Powerful Patriots: Nationalist Protest in Chinese Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmon, C. (2015). Organizing enlightenment: Information overload and the invention of the modern Research University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A.F., (1998) The Unification of China (Knopf, 1978), quoted in John king Fairbank and merle Goldman, China: A New History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press): 67.

  • Wright, T. (Ed.). (2019). Handbook of protest and resistance in China. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Anbang (谢安邦), New advances in research on Chinese higher education (中国高等教育研究新进展) (Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2013).

  • Xu, B. (2017). The politics of compassion: The Sichuan earthquake and civic engagement in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (June 2014). Engineering stability: Authoritarian political control over University students in post-Deng China. China Quarterly, 218, 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. L. (2016). China’s troubled quest for order: Leadership, organization, and the contradictions of the stability maintenance regime. Journal of Contemporary China, 26, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G. (2011). The power of the internet in China: Citizen activism online. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., (2019) Inside China’s crackdown on young Marxists, Financial Times, February 13. https://www.ft.com/content/fd087484-2f23-11e9-8744-e7016697f225

  • Yeh, W.-h. (1990). The alienated academy: Culture and politics in republican China, 1919–1937. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha, Q. (2011). Understanding China’s move to mass higher education from a policy perspective. In R. Hayhoe et al. (Eds.), Portraits of 21stcentury universities: In the move to mass higher education. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Guozha (张国柞), Report on the development of China’s cultural soft power (中国文化软实力发展报告) (Beijing: Peking University Press, 2013).

  • Zhang, L., Nathan, A. J., & Link, P. (2002). The Tiananmen papers. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Mingshu (张明澍), What kind of democracy do Chinese want? (中国人想要什么样民主) (Beijing: Social Sciences Press, 2013).

  • Zhang Yingqiang (张应强), Elite and mass: 60 years of Chinese higher education (精英与大众:中国高等教育60年) (Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2009).

  • Zhao, D. (2001). The power of Tiananmen: State-society relations and the 1989 Beijing student movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. (2004). A nation-state by construction: Dynamics of modern Chinese nationalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Hanmin, Deng Hongo, Chen He (朱汉民, 邓洪波, 陈和), eds., Chinese Academies (中國書院) (Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press, 2002).

  • Zhuang, Juan, “Beijing 2008: Volunteerism in Chinese Culture and its Olympic Interpretation and Influence,” The International Journal of the History of Sport, vol. 27, nos. 16–18 (2010): 2842–2862.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper benefitted greatly from comments by participants in the Holbrooke Forum on Authoritarianism in Global Context held at the American Academy in Berlin in the summer of 2015, especially Martin Dimitrov, Linda Cook, Nara Dillon and Natalie Koch. In addition, Peter Bol, Nancy Hearst and Benjamin Read offered many helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth J. Perry.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perry, E.J. Educated acquiescence: how academia sustains authoritarianism in China. Theor Soc 49, 1–22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09373-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09373-1

Keywords

Navigation