Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 351–382 | Cite as

Divergent trajectories of democratic deepening: comparing Brazil, India, and South Africa

  • Patrick HellerEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article argues that democratic deepening is shaped by shifting civil society-state relations that can only be understood by disaggregating democratic deepening into its component parts of participation, representation, and stateness. This frame is used to explore the divergent democratic trajectories of Brazil, India, and South Africa. Through the examples of local government transformation and social movement mobilization, I argue that a “project” civil society in Brazil has deepened democracy and transformed the state. In contrast, in South Africa and India civil society is increasingly being subordinated to political society. In South Africa, an active civil society has largely been sidelined as a politically consequential actor (containerization) and in India much of civil society has been fragmented and instrumentalized (involution).

Keywords

Civil society Democracy Inequality Local government Social movements State 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Peter Evans, Andreas Wimmer, Chris Gibson, Pauline Jones-Luong, Pratap Bhanu Mehta, Elizabeth Wood, Archon Fung, Gianpaolo Baiocchi, Marcelo Silva, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Ashutosh Varshney for their comments and thoughts.

References

  1. Agarwala, R. (2013). Informal labor, formal politics, and dignified discontent in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez, S. E. (1997). "Reweaving the fabric of collective action: Social movements and challenges to ‘actually existing democracy" in Brazil." Pp. 83–117 in Between resistance and revolution: Cultural politics and social protest, edited by R.G. Fox, and O. Starn. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, Doreen. 2007."Taking to the Streets: Has Developmental Local Government Failed in South Africa?" Pp. 53–77 in State of the Nation: South Africa 2007, edited by S. Buhlungu, J. Daniel, R. Southall, and J. Lutchman. Cape Town: Human Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
  5. Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baiocchi, G. (2006)."Inequality and innovation: Decentralization as an opportunity structure in Brazil." pp. 53–80 in Decentralization and local governance in developing countries, edited by P. Bardhan, and D. Mookherjee. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
  8. Ballard, R., Habib, A., & Valodia, I. (eds.). (2006). Voices of protest: Social movements in post-apartheid South Africa. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bardhan, P. (1999)."The state against society: The great divide in Indian social science discourse." pp. 184–195 in Nationalism, democracy and development, edited by S. Bose and A. Jalal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Beall, J., Crankshaw, O., & Parnell, S. (2002). Uniting a Divided City: Governance and social exclusion in Johannesburg. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  11. Berman, S. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49, 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertorelli, E., Heller, P., Swaminathan, S., & Varshney, A. (2017). Does citizenship abate class? Evidence and reflections from a south Indian City. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(32), August 12.Google Scholar
  13. Braga, R., & Purdy, S. (2019). A precarious hegemony: Neo-liberalism, social struggles, and the end of Lulismo in Brazil. Globalizations, 16(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burawoy, M. (2003). For a sociological Marxism: The complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics and Society, 31, 193–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caldeira, T., &  Holston, J. (2005)."State and urban space in Brazil: From modernist planning to democratic intervention." pp. 393–416 in Global Anthropology: Technology, governmentality, ethics, edited by A. Ong, and S.J. Collier. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Cardoso, F. H. & Faletto, E. 1979. Development and dependency in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Castells, M. (2003). The Power of identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Chandra, K. (2000). The transformation of ethnic politics in India: The decline of congress and the rise of the Bahujan Samaj Party in Hoshiarpur. Journal of Asian Studies, 59(1), 26–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chibber, V. (2005). From Class Compromise to Class Accommodation: Labor's Incorporation into the Indian Political Economy. Pp. 32–61 in Social Movements in India: Poverty, Power and Politics, edited by R. Ray, and M. Katzenstein. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Chipkin, I. (2007). Do South Africans exist? Nationalism, democracy and the identity of 'the people. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen, J. L. (2007). Civil Society and Globalization: Rethinking the Categories. In L. Trägårdh (Ed.), State and Civil Society in Norther Europe: the Swedish Model Reconsidered (pp. 37–66). New York: Berghahn BooksGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Corbridge, S., & Harriss, J. (2000). Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivastava, M., & Véron, R. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coslovsky, S. V. (2014). Flying under the radar? The state and the enforcement of labour laws in Brazil. Oxford Development Studies, 42(2), 190–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dagnino, E. (1998). "Culture, Citizenship, and Democracy: Changing Discourses and Practices of the Latin American Left." Pp. 33–63 in Cultures of politics, politics of cultures: Re-Visioning Latin American social movements, edited by S.E. Alvarez, E. Dagnino, and A. Escobar. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dagnino, E. (2007). Citizenship: A perverse confluence. Development and Practice, 17(4–5), 549–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Ferranti, D., G. E. P., Ferreira, F. H., & Walton, M. (2004). Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with history. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Google Scholar
  31. Desai, A., & Pithouse, R. (2004). “But We Were Thousands”: Dispossession, Resistance, Repossession and Repression in Mandela Park. Journal of African and Asian Studies, 39(4), 239–296.Google Scholar
  32. van Donk, M., Swilling, M., Pieterse, E., & Parnell, S. (2008). Consolidating developmental local government: Lessons from the South African experience. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press. Google Scholar
  33. dos Santos, W. G. (1979). Cidadania e justiça: A política social na ordem Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.Google Scholar
  34. Emirbayer, M., & Sheller, M. (1999). Publics in history. Theory and Society, 28(1), 145–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Evans, Peter. (2018). “Brazil: An unfolding tragedy,” Berkeley Review of Latin American Studies. Fall. https://clas.berkeley.edu/node/4092Accessed 24 March 2019
  37. Evans, P., & Heller, P. (2015). Human development, state transformation and the politics of the developmental state. In The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state (pp. 671–701) edited by S. Leibfried, F. Nullmeier, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. Levy, & J. Stephens. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  38. Fox, J. (1994). The difficult transition from Clientalism to citizenship. World Politics, 46(2), 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fraser, N. (1992). “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.” Pp. 109–143 in Habermas and the public sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Friedman, E. J., & Hochstetler, K. (2002). Assessing the third transition in Latin American democratization: Representational regimes and civil Society in Argentina and Brazil. Comparative Politics, 35(1), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Galvao, A. (2014). The Brazilian labor movements under PT governments. Latin American Perspectives, 41(5), 184–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gandhi, A., & Walton, M. (2012). Where do India's billionaires get their wealth? Economic and Political Weekly (pp. 10–14).Google Scholar
  43. Gasiorowski, M. J., & Power, T. J. (1998). The structural determinants of democratic consolidation: Evidence from the third world. Comparative Political Studies, 31(6), 740–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gethin, A. & Morgan, M. (2018). “Brazil Divided: Hindsights on the Growing Politicisation of Inequality.” World Inequality Lab Issue Brief 2018/3. Retrieved from https://wid.world/document/divided-brazil-hindsights-on-the-growing-politicization-of-inequality-wid-world-issue-brief-2018-3/Accessed 24 March 2019
  45. Gibson, C. L. (2018). Movement-Driven development: The politics of health and democracy in Brazil. Redwood City, CA. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Gramsci, A. (1972). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Vol. [1st). New York,: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Greenstein, R. (2003). State, civil society and the reconfiguration of power in post-apartheid South Africa. Unpublished paper, University of Witswatersrand.Google Scholar
  48. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Habermas, J. (2001). The Postnational constellation: Political essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Habib, A. & Valodia, I. (2006)."Reconstructing a social movement in an era of globalisation: A case study of COSATU." Pp. 225–254 in Voices of protest: Social movements in post-apartheid South Africa, edited by R. Ballard, A. Habib, and I. Valodia. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. Google Scholar
  51. Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R.R. (2018). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Harriss, J. (2003). “Do political regimes matter?” pp. 204–233 in Changing paths: International development and the new politics of inclusion, edited by Peter Houtzager and Mick Moore. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hart, G. (2014). Rethinking the South African crisis: Nationalism, populism, hegemony. Athens, GA. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  54. Heller, P. (1999). The labor of development: Workers and the transformation of capitalism in Kerala, India. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Heller, P. (2003). “Reclaiming democratic spaces: Civics and politics in post-transition Johannesburg,” pp. 155–184 in Robert Beauregard and Richard Tomlinson (eds.), Emerging Johannesburg. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Hipsher, P. (1998)."Democratic transitions as protest cycles: Social movement dynamics in democratizing Latin America." Pp. 152–172 in The social movement society, edited by Sidney Tarrow and David Meyer. New York: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  57. Hochstetler, K. (2004). Civil society in Lula's Brazil. In Working paper CBS-57-04. Centre for Brazilian Studies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  58. Hochstetler, K., & Keck, M. E. (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Houtzager, P. P., & Acharya, A. K. (2010). Associations, active citizenship, and the quality of democracy in Brazil and Mexico. Theory and Society, 40(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Huber, E. & Stephens, J. D. (2012). Democracy and the Left: Social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Huber, E., & Niedzwiecki, S. (2015). Emerging welfare states in lain American and East Asia. In The Oxford handbook on transformations of the state.Edited byS. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. D. Levey, & J. D. Stephens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  63. Huber, E., Rueschemeyer, D., & Stephens, J. D. (1997). The paradoxes of contemporary democracy: Formal, participatory, and social democracy. Comparative Politics, 29(3), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hunter, W. (2007). The normalization of an anomaly: The workers’ Party in Brazil. World Politics, 59(03), 440–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jaffrelot, C., Kohli, A., & Murali, K. (2019). Eds. Business and Politics in India. In Modern South Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Jayal, N. G. (2011). “The transformation of citizenship in India in the 1990s and beyond.” In Understanding India’s new political economy, edited by Sanjay Ruparelia, Sanjay Reddy, John Harriss, and Stuart Corbridge. Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Kadivar, M. A. (2018). Mass mobilization and the durability of New democracies. American Sociological Review, 83(2), 390–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kadivar, M. A., Usmani, A., &  Bradlow, B. (Forthcoming). “The long march: Deep democracy in Cross-national perspective.”  Social Forces.Google Scholar
  69. Kaldor, M. (2003). Global civil society: An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  70. Katzenstein, M. & Ray, R. (2005)."Introduction: In the beginning there was the Nehruvian state." Pp. 1–32 in Social Movements in India: Poverty, Power and Politics, edited by Raka Ray and Mary Katzenstein. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  71. Keck, M. E. (1992). The Workers' Party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Kerstenetzky, C. L. (2014). “The Brazilian social developmental state: A progressive agenda in a (still) conservative political society.” pp. 172–98 in The end of the developmental state? edited by M. Williams. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Klein, S., & Lee, C.-S. (2019). Towards a dynamic theory of civil society: The politics of forward and backward infiltration. Sociological Theory., 37(1), 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Levitsky, S., & Roberts, K. M. (2013). The resurgence of the Latin American left. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Mahajan, G. (1999). Civil society and its avatars: What happened to freedom and democracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 34, 1188–1196.Google Scholar
  77. Makura, D. (1999). The MDM, civil society and social transformation. Umrabulo, 7(3).Google Scholar
  78. Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Mangcu, X. (2008). To the Brink: The state of democracy in South Africa. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  80. Mehta, P. B. (2003). The burden of democracy. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  81. Mosoetsa, S. (2005). Compromised communities and re-emerging civic engagement in Mpumalanga Towship, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal. Journal of Southern African Studies, 31(4), 857–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. O'Donnell, G. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some Postcommunist countries. World Development, 21(8), 1355–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Oldfield, S. (2008)."Participatory mechanisms and community politics: Building consensus and conflict." Pp. 487–500 in Consolidating developmental local government: Lessons from the South African experience, edited by M. van Donk, M. Swilling, E. Pieterse, and S. Parnell. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
  84. Olver, C. (2017). How to steal a city: The battle for Nelson Mandela Bay: An inside account. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers.Google Scholar
  85. Omvedt, G. (1998)."The struggle for social justice and the expansion of the public sphere." pp. 130–145 in Democracy, difference & social justice, edited by G. Mahajan. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Paschel, T. S. (2016). Becoming black political subjects: Movements and ethno-racial rights in Colombia and Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pillay, D. (2013). Between social movements and political unionism: COSATU and democratic politics in South Africa. Rethinking Development and Inequality, 2, 10–27.Google Scholar
  89. Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Przeworski, A. (1992). The neoliberal fallacy. Journal of Democracy, 3(3), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Riley, D. (2005). Civic associations and authoritarian regimes in interwar Europe. American Sociological Review, 70(2), 288–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Roberts, K. M. (1998). Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Rueschemeyer, D., Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  94. Samuels, D. J. (2004). "The political logic of decentralization in Brazil," in Decentralization and democracy in Latin America editedby A. P. Monter & D. J. Samuels. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar
  95. Samuels, D., & Snyder, R. (2001). The value of a vote: Malapportionment in comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 31(4), 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sandbrook, R., M. Edelman, P. Heller, and J. Teichman. 2007. Social democracy in the global periphery: Origins, challenges, prospects. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Scheper-Hughes, N. (1992). Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  98. Seidman, G. (1994). Manufacturing militance: Workers' movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  99. Seidman, Gay. 2010. Brazil’s ‘pro-poor’ strategies: What South Africa could learn. Transformation (72/73):86–103.Google Scholar
  100. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  101. Sivaramakrishnan, K. C. (2000). Power to the people. Delhi: Konark Publishers.Google Scholar
  102. Somers, M. R. (1993). Citizenship and the place of the public sphere: Law, community, and political culture in the transition to democracy. American Sociological Review, 58(October), 587–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Stepan, A. (2000). Brazil’s decentralized federalism. Daedalus, 129(2), 145–169.Google Scholar
  104. Swilling, M. (2017). “Betrayal of a promise: How South Africa is being stolen.” State Capacity Research Project. Pp. 1–63. http://47zhcvti0ul2ftip9rxo9fj9.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Betrayal-of-the-Promise-25052017.pdfAccessed 24 March 2019
  105. Tarlau, R. (Forthcoming). Occupying schools, occupying land: How the landless workers movement transformed Brazilian education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Telles, E. E. (2004). Race in another America: The significance of skin color in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  108. Usmani, A. (2018). Democracy and the class struggle. American Journal of Sociology, 124(3), 664–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Varshney, A. (2000). Is India becoming more democratic? Journal of Asian Studies, 59(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Veeraraghavan, R. (2017). Strategies for synergy in a high modernist project: Two community responses to India’s NREGA rural work program. World Development, 99, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wampler, B. (2015). Activiating democracy in Brazil: Popular participation, social justice, and interlocking institutions. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  112. Webster, E., & Buhlungu, S. (2004). Between marginalisation and revitalisation? The state of the trade union movement in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 31(100), 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Weyland, K. G. (1996). Democracy without equity: Failures of reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  114. Yadav, Y. (2000). Understanding the second democratic upsurge: Trends of Bahujan participation in electoral politics in the 1990s. In Transforming India: Social and political dynamics of democracy (p. 145).Google Scholar
  115. Yashar, D. J. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations