Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Why combatants fight: the Irish Republican Army and the Bosnian Serb Army compared

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates what motivates combatants to fight in non-conventional armed organizations. Drawing on interviews with ex-combatants from the Army of the Serbian Republic in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Provisional Irish Republican Army, the article compares the role of nationalist ideology, coercive organizational structures, and small group solidarity in these two organizations. Our analysis indicates that coercion played a limited role in both armed forces: in the VRS coercion was relevant mostly in the recruitment phase, while in the IRA its direct impact was only discernible during armed operations. We also find that although both organizations are seen as being highly motivated by nationalist ideas, the picture is much more complex and nationalism is less present than expected. The study demonstrates that nationalism played a relatively marginal role in combatants’ motivation to fight. Instead our research indicates that individualist motivations, small group solidarity, and local networks dominate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Neither of these forces was the Army of a legitimately constituted State and the terms “soldier” and “combatant” are used to indicate membership of a hierarchically organized military formation rather than to suggest the legitimacy of these forces or their conformity with the rules of warfare.

  2. This is not to say that some members of these military organizations were not in part motivated by other material incentives including the protection of their homes or in some instances the opportunist pillaging of abandoned goods (see Bougarel 2006, p. 481).

  3. Irish Times, 22 May 2014, “PSNI to seek entire Boston College tape archive.”

  4. Handbook for Volunteers of the Irish Republican Army: Notes on Guerilla Warfare (1956) IRA General Headquarters, Dublin. https://archive.org/stream/IRA_Volunteers_Handbook_Notes_on_Guerrilla_Warfare/IRA_Volunteers_Handbook_Notes_on_Guerrilla_Warfare_djvu.txt

References

  • Alonso, R. (2007). The IRA and armed struggle. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartov, O. (1992). Hitler’s army: Soldiers, nazis, and war in the third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartov, O. (2001). The eastern front, 1941–1945: German troops and the barbarization of warfare. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, P., & Mallie, E. (1988). The provisional IRA. London: Corgi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolten, C. (2012). I did it to save my life: Love and survival in Sierra Leone (pp. 21–22). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bougarel, X. (2006). The shadow of heros: former combatants in post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina. International Social Science Journal, 58(189), 479–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G., & Feeney, B. (2012). Insider: Gerry Bradley’s life in the IRA. Dublin: O'Brien.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Army. (2006). Operation Banner: An analysis of military operations in Northern Ireland. Prepared under the direction of the Chief of the General Staff. London: Ministry of Defence.

  • Cigar, N. (2001). Serb war effort and termination of the war. In B. Magaš & I. Žanić (Eds.), The war in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina 1991–1995. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, C. (1984 [1832]). On war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2000). Doing well out of war: An economic perspective. In M. Berdal & D. Malone (Eds.), Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars. Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2008). Violence: A micro-sociological theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2013). Does nationalist sentiment increase fighting efficancy? A skeptical view from the sociology of violence. In J. A. Hall & S. Malešević (Eds.), Nationalism and war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E. & MacGovern, M. (1997) Killing rage. Granta Books.

  • Conway, K. (2014). Southside provisional: From freedom fighter to the four courts. Dublin: Orpen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coogan, T. P. (1987). The IRA. Glasgow: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. (1909). Social organization: A study of the larger mind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J. (2011). Sampling essentials. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soysa, I. (2002). Paradise is a bazaar? Greed, creed, and governance in civil war, 1989–1999. Journal of Peace Research, 39(4), 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitirijević, B. B. (2001). Militarism and the creation of social identities since 1945: A comparative study on cases of Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. Sofia: Centre for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Picq, A. (2006 [1880]) Battle studies. New York: Bazaarbooks.

  • English, R. (2003). Armed struggle: The history of the IRA. London: Pan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaub, F. (2011). Military Integration after Civil Wars. London: Routledge.

  • Gat, A. (2006). War in human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gow, J. (1992). Legitimacy and the military: The Yugoslav crisis. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. H. (1997). Postmodern war: The new politics of conflict. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, B., & Millar, S. (2010). The lost revolution: The story of the official IRA and the Workers’ Party. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiers, W., & Wimmer, A. (2013). Is nationalism the cause or consequence of imperial breakdown? In J. A. Hall & S. Malešević (Eds.), Nationalism and war. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judah, T. (1997). The Serbs. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, J. (1994). A history of warfare. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (2013). The combat soldier: Infantry tactics and cohesion in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (2015). Discipline and punish: Encouraging combat performance in the citizen and professional army. In A. King (Ed.), Frontline: Combat and cohesion in 21 st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leader Maynard, J. (2014). Rethinking the role of ideology in mass atrocities. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(5), 821–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N (1985 [1520]). The prince. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Magaš, B., & Žanić, I. (2001). The war in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina 1991–1995. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S. (2002). Ideology, legitimacy and the new state. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S. (2006). Identity as ideology. New York: Plagrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S. (2010). The sociology of war and violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S. (2013). Nation-states and nationalisms: Organization, ideology and solidarity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S. (2017). The rise of organised brutality: A historical sociology of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2012). The sources of social power III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2013). The sources of social power IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. (1947). Men against fire: The problem of battle command. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milovanović, M. (2011). Stvaranje i razvoj Vojske Republike Srpske u toku Odbrambeno-Otadzbinskog rata u BiH 1992 do 1995 godine. In Vojska Republike Srpske u Odbrambeno-Otadzbinskom ratu: Aspekti, Organizacija, Operacije. Banja Luka: Republicki Centar za istrazivanje Ratnih Zlocina.

  • Moloney, E. (2002). A secret history of the IRA. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, E. (2010). Voices from the grave: two men’s war in Ireland. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskos, C. (1975). The American combat soldier in Vietnam. Journal of Social Issues, 31(4), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ó Dochartaigh, N. (2010). Nation and Neighbourhood: Nationalist mobilisation and local solidarities in the north of Ireland. In A. Guelke (Ed.), The challenges of ethno-nationalism. Palgrave: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, R. (2012). The Boston college tapes. History Ireland,, 12–16.

  • O’Donnell, R. (2017). The provisional IRA: History, politics and remembrance. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Remembering the troubles: Contesting the recent past in Northern Ireland. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, A. (2000). The manipulation of ethnicity: from ethnic cooperation to violence and war in Yugoslavia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(6), 982–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Ballance, E. (1995). Civil war in Bosnia, 1992-1994. New York: Palgrave.

  • O'Brien, B. (1999). The long war: The IRA and Sinn Féin. Dublin: O'Brien.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, B. (2007). Analysing partition: Definition, classification and explanation. Political Geography, 26(8), 886–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pravilo službe VRS (1993). Banja Luka: Vojska Republike Srpske.

  • Ron, J. (2003). Frontiers and ghettos: State violence in Serbia and Israel. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (2006). A closer look at oil, diamonds, and civil war. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 265–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, R. (1999). A different perspective: cohesion, morale, and operational effectiveness in the German Army, fall 1944. Armed Forces & Society, 25(3), 477–508 499–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E., & Janowitz, M. (1948). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in world war II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, 280–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebold, G. (2007). The essence of military cohesion. Armed Forces and Society, 33(2), 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. R. (1997). Fighting for Ireland? The military strategy of the Irish republican movement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, N. K. (1991). Mates and Muchachos: Unit cohesion in the Falklands/ Malvinas war. New York: Brasseys Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S., et al. (1949). The American soldier: Combat and its aftermath. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, S. (1994). Hypotheses on nationalism and war. International Security, 8(4), 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Voris, W. (1975). Violence in Ulster: an oral documentary. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2013). The waves of war: Nationalism, state formation and ethnic exclusion in the modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žanic, I. (2007). Flag on the mountain: A political anthropology of war in Croatia and Bosnia. London: Saqi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žunec, O., et al. (2013). Oficir i casnik. Hrvatska Sveucilisna Naklada: Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our interviewees for sharing their experiences with us. We would also like to thank Katy Hayward, John A Hall and the four anonymous Theory and Society reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siniša Malešević.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malešević, S., Ó Dochartaigh, N. Why combatants fight: the Irish Republican Army and the Bosnian Serb Army compared. Theor Soc 47, 293–326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9315-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9315-9

Keywords

Navigation