Abstract
Based on interviews with climate-change activists and NGO workers in Finland and Malawi, this article reconsiders the ways in which the coordination of identity projects and action is approached in social movement scholarship. Rather than beginning with personal and collective identities, we take our cue from recent work by Laurent Thévenot and trace actors’ forms of engagement—the various ways actors produce commonality. As we show, doing so in vastly different social contexts allows us to see permutations in such forms afforded by participation in a transnational social movement and to identify patterns of collective action that we would otherwise be apt to miss. Finnish activists narrated their activities by way of engaging in the forms of the common good driving the climate movement, but coordinated various situations also through engagement in familiarity, comfort, and ease. Malawian activists and NGO employees also spoke of the common good the movements worked to achieve, but principally created common ground by engaging in shared individual choices and projects, which were jointly consecrated by fellow NGO participants. Ultimately, we argue that tracing forms of engagement enables more in-depth understanding of what is at stake when people act together in social movement organizations: moving away from collective and personal identity to patterns of engagement allows a vantage point into the processes through which commonality is created and generates new hypotheses regarding the coordination of action in social movement organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
The study is part of a larger comparative effort, Climate Change and Civil Society (CLIC), in which the civil society’s participation in the politics of climate change is analyzed and compared from the perspectives of media debate, (transnational) NGO networks, and local civil society groups in Finland, France, India, Indonesia, Malawi, Russia, and the US (Alapuro 2010; Ylä-Anttila and Kukkonen 2017).
The authors want to thank Anna Kukkonen, Tomi Lehtimäki, Elina Mikola, and Veera Nurmenniemi for their help with the Finnish interviews.
The authors want to thank Hastings Honde and James Mkandawire for interviewing and analytic insights in the Malawian context.
This results in, for example, the particular system of financing of civic associations and NGOs, based largely on various forms of government funding, including the profits of the state-owned gambling monopoly, Finland’s Slot Machine Association.
Activists’ ages varied from their early twenties to late forties, thus the length of prior experience in social movement organizations also varied significantly. However, only one interviewee had less than two years of campaign experience at the time of the interview.
The acronym stands for “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation.” This issue was first placed on the agenda of the 2005 international climate-change negotiations and has since become both influential and the source of controversy in a global movement (IIED 2018).
The authors thank Tom Hannan for this observation.
There were two types of negative cases in the thirty-five interviews where narratives were strikingly different. The first was a narrative-cluster of a few interviewees who were above fifty years old and thus not part of the same generation; the second, the only interviewee who did not have a high school certificate. Although these cases are important, we do not analyze them here for reasons of space.
Boltanski and Chiapello (2005) have suggested that the order of the project is a novel form of justification, in which the common good is adaptability, flexibility, and continuous re-connecting, and the logic of belonging and ordering depends on temporal assemblages of peoples and things. In our analysis, the world of projects does not, however, emerge in this fashion. The shared goals of the Malawian activists did not portray the project itself as a purpose or an evaluated good, but instead the advancing of the plural individual plans and forging the common in the form of shared goals (see Eranti 2016).
References
Alapuro, R. (2010). Climate change and civil society. Research plan. Helsinki: Academy of Finland.
Alapuro, R., & Stenius, H. (1987). Kansanliikkeet loivat kansakunnan [Popular movements created the nation]. In R. Alapuro (Ed.), Kansa liikkeessä (pp. 7–52). Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä.
Archer, M. S., & Maccarini, A. M. (2013). Engaging with the world: Agency, institutions, historical formations. London: Routledge.
Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
Biernacki, R. (2012). Reinventing evidence in social inquiry: Decoding facts and variables. London: Palgrave.
Bobel, C. (2007). ‘I’m not an activist, though I’ve done a lot of it’: doing activism, being activist and the ‘perfect standard’ in a contemporary movement. Social Movement Studies, 6(2), 147–159.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “Identity”. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47.
Cohen, J. L. (1985). Strategy or identity: new theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements. Social Research, 52(4), 663–716.
Corrigall-Brown, C. (2011). Patterns of protest: trajectories of participation in social movements. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Eliasoph, N., & Lichterman, P. (2003). Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 735–794.
Englund, H. (2006). Prisoners of freedom: Human rights and the African poor. Berkeley: California University Press.
Eranti, V. (2016). Individuals doing politics: Urban participation, social media campaigning and online nano-politics. University of Helsinki: Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences.
Eranti, V. (2018). Engagements, grammars, and the public: from the liberal grammar to individual interests. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2018.1442733.
Frye, M. (2012). Bright futures in Malawi’s new dawn: educational aspirations as assertions of identity. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1565–1624.
Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct. A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390–407.
Ghaziani, A. (2011). Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems, 58(1), 99–125.
Goodwin, J. (1997). The libidinal constitution of a high-risk social movement: affectual ties and solidarity in the Huk rebellion, 1946 to 1954. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 53–69.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2009). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hunt, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (1994). Identity talk in the peace and justice movement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 488–517.
IIED. (2018). REDD: protecting climate, forests and livelihoods. https://www.iied.org/redd-protecting-climate-forests-livelihoods, consulted 01/2018.
Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jepperson, R. L. (2002). Political modernities: disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 61–85.
Johnson-Hanks, J. (2002). On the modernity of traditional contraception: time and the social context of fertility. Population and Development Review, 28(2), 229–249.
Johnson-Hanks, J. (2006). Uncertain honor: Modern motherhood in an African crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnston, H., & Klandermans, B. (Eds.). (1995). Social movements and culture. London: UCL press.
Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85.
Krause, M. (2014a). Comparing everything to everything else: Freeing the practice from the theory. Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.
Krause, M. (2014b). The good project: Humanitarian NGOs and the fragmentation of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuukkanen, M. (2018). Anarkistien keinot ja päämäärät. Tutkimus suomalaisesta anarkistiliikkeestä 2010-luvun alussa. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Lammert, C., & Sarkowsky, K. (2010). Travelling concepts: Negotiating diversity in Canada and Europe. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (Eds.). (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lichterman, P. (1996). The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luhtakallio, E. (2010). Perceptions of Democracy in Helsinki and Lyon. In Stenius, Henrik & Alapuro, Risto (eds.): Nordic Associations in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 281-306). Nomos.
Luhtakallio, E. (2012). Practicing democracy. Local activism and politics in France and Finland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 41–63). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Meyer, D. S., Whittier, N., & Robnett, B. (2002). Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. (2002 [1843]). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.
Mische, A. (2009). Projects and possibilities: researching futures in action. Sociological Forum, 24, 694–704.
Mische, A. (2014). Measuring futures-in-action: projective grammars in Rio+ 20 debates. Theory and Society, 43(3-4), 437–464.
Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52(4), 817–868.
Oyakawa, M. (2015). “Turning private pain into public action”: the cultivation of identity narratives by a faith-based community organization. Qualitative Sociology, 38(4), 395–415.
Polletta, F. (1998). “It was like fever …” narrative and identity in social protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 137–159.
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305.
Pugh, A. J. (2013). What good are interviews for thinking about culture? demystifying interpretive analysis. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 42–68.
Reger, J., Myers, D. J., & Einwohner, R. L. (Eds.). (2008). Identity work in social movements. Vol. 30 of Social movements, protest, and contention. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ruiz-Junco, N. (2011). Losing neutrality in your everyday life: framing experience and activist identity construction in the spanish environmental movement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(6), 713–733.
Simi, P., Futrell, R., & Bubolz, B. (2016). Parenting as activism: identity alignment and activist persistence in the white power movement. The Sociological Quarterly, 57(3), 491–519.
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: a social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.
Smith, D. J. (2003). Patronage, per diems and ‘the workshop mentality’: the practice of family planning programs in Southeastern Nigeria. World Development, 31(4), 703–715.
Smith, J., & Johnston, H. (2002). Globalization and resistance: Transnational dimensions of social movements. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
Snow, D. A., & McAdam, D. (2000). Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement Nexus. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 41–67). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Somers, M. (1992). Narrativity, narrative identity, and social action: rethinking english working-class formation. Social Science History, 16(4), 591–630.
Stryker, S. (2000). Identity competition: key to differential social movement participation? In S. Stryker et al. (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 21–40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stryker, S., Owens, T. J., & White, R. W. (Eds.). (2000). Self, identity, and social movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Swidler, A., & Watkins, S. C. (2009). “Teach a man to fish”: the sustainability doctrine and its social consequences. World Development, 37(7), 1182–1196.
Swidler, A., & Watkins, S. C. (2017). A fraught embrace: The romance and reality of AIDS activism in Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tavory, I. (2011) The Question of Moral Action: A Formalist Position. Sociological Theory 29(4):272-293
Tavory, I., & Eliasoph, N. (2013). Coordinating futures: towards a theory of anticipation. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 908–942.
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1995). Analytical approaches to social movement culture of the women’s movement. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 163–187). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagements with the world. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56–74). London: Routledge.
Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive forms and engagements: moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10, 413–427.
Thévenot, L. (2013). The human being invested in social forms: Four extensions of the notion of engagement. In M. S. Archer & A. M. Maccarini (Eds.), Engaging with the world: Agency, institutions, historical formations (pp. 162–180). London: Routledge.
Thévenot, L. (2014). Voicing concern and difference: from public spaces to common-places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 7–34.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.
Valocchi, S. (2001). Individual identities, collective identities, and organizational structure: the relationship of the political left and gay liberation in the United States. Sociological Perspectives, 44(4), 445–467.
Valocchi, S. (2013). Activism as a career, calling and way of life. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42(2), 169–200.
Viterna, J. (2013). Women in war: The micro-processes of mobilization in El Salvador. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.
Wettergren, Å. (2009). Fun and laughter: culture jamming and the emotional regime of late capitalism. Social Movement Studies, 8(1), 1.
World Bank. (2013). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD Checked 2015-5-26.
Ylä-Anttila, T., & Kukkonen, A. (2017). How arguments are justified in the media debate on climate change in the USA and France. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 394–408.
Ylä-Anttila, T., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). justifications analysis: understanding moral evaluations in public debates. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 4.
Ylä-Anttila, T., & Swarnakar, P. (2017). Crowding-in: how indian civil society organizations began mobilizing around climate change. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(2), 273–292.
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank the reviewers of Theory and Society for insightful comments that pushed our thinking further. We are grateful for comments and discussions on different versions of the text to Rogers Brubaker, Nina Eliasoph, Veikko Eranti, Robert Jansen, Paul Lichterman, Laurent Thévenot, the participants of the HEPO Seminar, the participants at the IASR/Tampere lectures, and the participants of the comparative historical workshop at UCLA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luhtakallio, E., Tavory, I. Patterns of engagement: identities and social movement organizations in Finland and Malawi. Theor Soc 47, 151–174 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9314-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9314-x
Keywords
- Climate change
- Engagement
- Finland
- Identity
- Malawi
- Social movements