Theory and Society

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 233–254 | Cite as

Totally alive: the Wisconsin Uprising and the source of collective effervescence

Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Collective effervescence plays a foundational role in the generation of society. Both the canonical explication of this concept, Émile Durkheim’s Elementary Forms of Religious Life, and current literature on the topic, are unable to distinguish between two plausible causes of effervescence: shared affiliation or collective action. This study reports a case of collective effervescence in which much of the assembled group had no prior affiliation. This finding proves that shared affiliation is not a necessary condition for effervescence, and supplies evidence for the hypothesis that collective action, not shared affiliation per se, is the source of effervescence in general. The evidence is a detailed ethnographic and in-depth interview study of the Wisconsin Uprising of 2011.

Keywords

Collective action Democratic ideology Durkheim Ethnographic methods Morality Social movements 

References

  1. Alexander, J. C. (2004). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory, 22(4), 527–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous. (2011a). What if the whole world was like this, every day? Wisconsin uprising archive. Item mlk01_00186.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. (2011b). People's mic during re-occupation. Wisconsin uprising archive. Item bec01_00028.Google Scholar
  4. Bataille, G. (1996). [1933] Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1917–1939. Trans. A. Stoekl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berk, R. A. (1972). The emergence of muted violence in crowd behavior: A case study of an almost race riot. In J. F. Short Jr. & M. E. Wolfgang (Eds.), Collective Violence (pp. 309–328). Chicago, Illinois: Aldine.Google Scholar
  6. Bosley, C. (2011). Tattoos. Wisconsin Uprising Archive. Item cxb01_0596.Google Scholar
  7. Buehler, A. (2012). The twenty-first century study of collective effervescence: Expanding the context of fieldwork. Fieldwork In Religion, 7(1), 70–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calhoun, C. (1994). Neither gods nor emperors: Students and the struggle for democracy in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carlton-Ford, S. L. (1992). Charisma, ritual, collective effervescence, and self-esteem. The Sociological Quarterly, 33(3), 366–387.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, R. (1997). A sociological guilt trip: Comment on Connell. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1558–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, R. (2001). Social movements and the focus of emotional attention. In J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 27–44). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, R. (2004). Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, R. (2005). The Durkheimian movement in France and in world sociology. In J. C. Alexander & P. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim (pp. 101–135). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, J. (2012). Theorizing Wisconsin's 2011 protests: Community-based unionism confronts accumulation by dispossession. American Ethnologist, 39(1), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, R. (2014). Interaction ritual chains and collective effervescence. In C. von Scheve & M. Salmela (Eds.), Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology (pp. 299–311). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, R. (2017). Emotional dynamics and emotional domination drive the microtrajectory of moments of collective contingency: Comment on Ermakoff. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Douglas, M. (1996). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Durkheim, É. (1960). [1912] Les formes élémentaires de la via religieuse. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. [In French.]Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, É. (1995). [1912] The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. K.E. Fields. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ermakoff, I. (2015). The structure of contingency. American Journal of Sociology, 121(1), 64–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ermakoff, I. (2017). Emotions, cognitions, and collective alignment: A response to Collins. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 284–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falasca-Zamponi, S. (2011). Rethinking the political: The sacred, aesthetic politics, and the Collège de Sociologie. Montreal, Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fields, K. E. (1982). Charismatic religion as popular protest: The ordinary and the extraordinary in social movements. Theory and Society, 11(3), 321–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fields, K.E. (1995). Translator’s introduction: Religion as an eminently social thing. In Durkheim (1995).Google Scholar
  25. Fields, K. E. (1996). Durkheim and the idea of soul. Theory and Society, 25(2), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Friedland, R. (2005). Drag Kings at the Totem Ball: The Erotics of Collective Representation in Émile Durkheim and Sigmund Freud. In J.C. Alexander & P. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim (pp. 239–273).Google Scholar
  27. Gamson, W., & Meyer, D. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 275–290). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Granat, A. (2011a). Medley from 3/12. Wisconsin Uprising Archive. Item axg01_00012.Google Scholar
  29. Granat, A. (2011b). Music and Dancing. Wisconsin Uprising Archive. Item axg01_00005.Google Scholar
  30. Haidt, J. (2011). Why we celebrate a killing. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/08/opinion/08haidt.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.
  31. Howitt, A. W. (1904). The native tribes of south-East Australia. London, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Kearney, M. (2005). The Societal Ideal and Religious Authority in the Layene Brotherhood. B.A. Thesis, Dept. of Sociology, Haverford College.Google Scholar
  33. Kearney, M. (2013a). What’s so bad about the budget repair bill? Chicago: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Social Science History Association.Google Scholar
  34. Kearney, M. (2013b). Breaking the pattern: Youth Authority in the Wisconsin Uprising. New York: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems.Google Scholar
  35. Kearney, M. (2017). Escalating moral obligation in the Wisconsin uprising of 2011. Social Forces.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox091.
  36. Le Bon, G. (2001). [1895] The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar
  37. Liebling, A.J. (2008). [1944] World War II Writings. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
  38. Lindholm, C. (1990). Charisma. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Mestrovic, S. G. (2011). [1991] The Coming fin de Siècle: An Application of Durkheim’s Sociology to Modernity and Postmodernism (Vol. 3). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Mitchell, M. M. (1931). Emile Durkheim and the philosophy of nationalism. Political Science Quarterly, 46(1), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mosse, G. L. (1987). Masses and man: Nationalism and fascist perceptions of reality. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mukherjee, S. R. (2010). On violence as the negativity of the Durkheimian: Between anomie, sacrifice, and effervescence. In S. R. Mukherjee (Ed.), Durkheim And Violence (pp. 5–39). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Nichols, J. (2011). Wisconsin crowds swell to 30,000: Key GOP legislators waver. The Nation. http://www.thenation.com/blog/158661/wisconsin-crowds-swell-30000-key-gop-legislators-waver. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.
  44. Parsons, T. (1949). [1937] The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Pickering, W.S.F. (1984). Durkheim’s sociology of religion: Themes and theories. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Ranulf, S. (1939). Scholarly forerunners of fascism. Ethics, 50(1), 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rappaport, R. A. (1984). Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a new Guinea people (2nd ed.). Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rawls, A. (2004). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim’s the elementary forms of religious life. Cambridge, England. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Richman, M. (1995). The sacred group: A Durkheimian perspective on the Collège de sociologie. In C. B. Gill (Ed.), Bataille: Writing the sacred (pp. 58–76). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Riseling, S. (2013). A view from the interior: Policing the protests at the Wisconsin state capitol. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Maven Mark Books.Google Scholar
  51. Shilling, C., & Mellor, P. A. (1998). Durkheim, morality, and modernity: Collective effervescence, Homo Duplex and the sources of moral action. British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smyth, R. B. (1878). The aborigines of Victoria. Melbourne, Australia: J. Ferres.Google Scholar
  53. Snow, D. A., Benford, R. D., McCammon, H. J., Hewitt, L., & Fitzgerald, S. (2014). The Emergence, Development, and Future of the Framing Perspective: 25+ Years Since ‘Frame Alignment’. Mobilization, 19(1), 23–45.Google Scholar
  54. Spencer, B., & Gillen, F. J. (1899). The native tribes of Central Australia. London, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Spencer, B., & Gillen, F. J. (1904). The northern tribes of Central Australia. London, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Stein, J., & Marley, P. (2013). More than they bargained for: Scott Walker, unions, and the fight for Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power In Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tiryakian, E. A. (1995). Collective effervescence, social change and Charisma: Durkheim, Weber, and 1989. International Sociology, 10(3), 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theater: The human seriousness of play. Baltimore, Maryland: PAJ Press.Google Scholar
  60. Vaughn, D. (2011). Firefighters march through the capitol. Wisconsin Uprising Archive. Item dxv01_00009.Google Scholar
  61. Wisconsin State Senate (2011). Senate bill 11 [later known as act 10]. http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/proposaltext/2011/JR1/SB11. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.
  62. Wisconsin vs. Fitzgerald. (2011a) Circuit Court, County of Dane. Case no. 11CV1244.Google Scholar
  63. Wisconsin vs. Fitzgerald. (2011b) Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Case nos. 2011AP613-LV and 2011AP765–2.Google Scholar
  64. Wispolitics (2011). AFL-CIO says 15,000 at rally. Budget Blog. http://budget.wispolitics.com2011/02/alf-cio-says-15000-at-rally.html/. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.
  65. Xygalatas, D., Konvalinka, I., Roepstorff, A., & Bulbulia, J. (2011). Quantifying collective effervescence: Heart-rate dynamics at a fire-walking ritual. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4(6), 735–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zolberg, A. (1972). Moments of madness. Politics and Society, 2(2), 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zolberg, A. (2008). How Many Exceptionalisms? Explorations in Comparative Macroanalysis. Philadelphia. Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Studies of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations