Pragmatism has recently gained ground as a theoretical perspective in sociology. The approach is not without its critics, however. One common charge is that pragmatism is oriented toward the micro and not well suited for the explanation of meso- or macro-level events, processes, or outcomes. In this paper—a review essay—I consider whether the charge has merit. I examine four studies that draw heavily on pragmatism and give some indication of its explanatory potential. Taken together, these studies suggest that pragmatism has much to offer analysts of large-scale social phenomena. At the same time, key issues remain to be worked out.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abbott, A. (2016). Processual sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Archer, M. (2010). Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory, 28, 272–303.
Archer, M. (2015). Introduction: Other conceptions of generative mechanisms and ours. In M. Archer (Ed.), Generative mechanisms transforming the social order (pp. 1–26). Cham: Springer.
Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Becker, M. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of organizational routines. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Beckert, J. (2002). Beyond the market: The social foundations of economic efficiency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Coleman, J. (1990). The foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
da Silva, F. C. (2015). Following the book: Towards a pragmatic sociology of the book. Sociology, 50, 1185-1200.
Demeulenaere, P. (Ed.) (2011). Analytical sociology and social mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43, 547–579.
Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American City. New York: Crown.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Emirbayer, M., & Desmond, M. (2015). The racial order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Emirbayer, M., & Goldberg, C. (2005). Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and collective emotions in contentious politics. Theory and Society, 34, 469–518.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.
Emirbayer, M., & Schneiderhan, E. (2013). Dewey and Bourdieu on democracy. In P. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 131–157). Durham: Duke University Press.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74, 358–379.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hedström, P., & Bearman, P. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.
Herrigel, G. (2010). Manufacturing possibilities: Creative action and industrial recomposition in the United States, Germany, and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jansen, R. (2016). Situated political innovation: Explaining the historical emergence of new modes of political practice. Theory and Society, 45, 319–360.
Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Macy, M. (1993). Backward-looking social control. American Sociological Review, 58, 819–836.
Macy, M. (1997). Identity, interest and emergent rationality: An evolutionary synthesis. Rationality and Society, 9, 427–448.
Manzo, G. (2010). Analytical sociology and its critics. European Journal of Sociology, 51, 129–170.
Manzo, G. (Ed.). (2014). Analytical sociology: Actions and networks. Chichester: Wiley.
Martin, J. L. (2011). The explanation of social action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. L. (2017). What can sociologists get out of pragmatism. Working paper.
Morris, C. (1964). Pragmatism and the behavioral sciences. Manuscript, Charles Morris collection, Institute for American Thought, Indiana University-Purdue University Indiannapolis, 3rd accession, box 6, folder 2.
Pentland, B., & Hærem, T. (2015). Organizational routines as patterns of action: Implications for organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 465–487.
Porpora, D. (2015). Reconstructing sociology: The critical realist approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reed, I., and Lichterman, P. (2017). Toward a pragmatist sociological history. Working paper.
Sharkey, P. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Swartz, D. (2002). The sociology of habit: The perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22(S), 61–69.
Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tavory, I., & Eliasoph, N. (2013). Coordinating futures: Toward a theory of anticipation. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 908–942.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Whitford, J. (2002). Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: Why rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. Theory and Society, 31, 325–363.
Whitford, J. (2005). The new old economy: Networks, institutions, and the transformation of American manufacturing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making: Institutions, power, networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
Winship, C. (2018). Inchoate situations and extra-rational behavior. In H. Staubmann and V. Lidz (Eds.), Rationality in the social sciences (pp. 223–243). Cham: Springer.
About this article
Cite this article
Gross, N. Pragmatism and the study of large-scale social phenomena. Theor Soc 47, 87–111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9307-9
- Analytical sociology
- Critical realism
- Macro sociology
- Political economy