Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 87–111 | Cite as

Pragmatism and the study of large-scale social phenomena

  • Neil Gross
Article

Abstract

Pragmatism has recently gained ground as a theoretical perspective in sociology. The approach is not without its critics, however. One common charge is that pragmatism is oriented toward the micro and not well suited for the explanation of meso- or macro-level events, processes, or outcomes. In this paper—a review essay—I consider whether the charge has merit. I examine four studies that draw heavily on pragmatism and give some indication of its explanatory potential. Taken together, these studies suggest that pragmatism has much to offer analysts of large-scale social phenomena. At the same time, key issues remain to be worked out.

Keywords

Analytical sociology Critical realism Habit Macro sociology Political economy Pragmatism 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2016). Processual sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (2010). Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory, 28, 272–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M. (2015). Introduction: Other conceptions of generative mechanisms and ours. In M. Archer (Ed.), Generative mechanisms transforming the social order (pp. 1–26). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, M. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of organizational routines. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Beckert, J. (2002). Beyond the market: The social foundations of economic efficiency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. (1990). The foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. da Silva, F. C. (2015). Following the book: Towards a pragmatic sociology of the book. Sociology, 50, 1185-1200.Google Scholar
  11. Demeulenaere, P. (Ed.) (2011). Analytical sociology and social mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43, 547–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American City. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emirbayer, M., & Desmond, M. (2015). The racial order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emirbayer, M., & Goldberg, C. (2005). Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and collective emotions in contentious politics. Theory and Society, 34, 469–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emirbayer, M., & Schneiderhan, E. (2013). Dewey and Bourdieu on democracy. In P. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 131–157). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74, 358–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hedström, P., & Bearman, P. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herrigel, G. (2010). Manufacturing possibilities: Creative action and industrial recomposition in the United States, Germany, and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jansen, R. (2016). Situated political innovation: Explaining the historical emergence of new modes of political practice. Theory and Society, 45, 319–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Macy, M. (1993). Backward-looking social control. American Sociological Review, 58, 819–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Macy, M. (1997). Identity, interest and emergent rationality: An evolutionary synthesis. Rationality and Society, 9, 427–448.Google Scholar
  32. Manzo, G. (2010). Analytical sociology and its critics. European Journal of Sociology, 51, 129–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manzo, G. (Ed.). (2014). Analytical sociology: Actions and networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, J. L. (2011). The explanation of social action. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, J. L. (2017). What can sociologists get out of pragmatism. Working paper.Google Scholar
  36. Morris, C. (1964). Pragmatism and the behavioral sciences. Manuscript, Charles Morris collection, Institute for American Thought, Indiana University-Purdue University Indiannapolis, 3rd accession, box 6, folder 2.Google Scholar
  37. Pentland, B., & Hærem, T. (2015). Organizational routines as patterns of action: Implications for organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Porpora, D. (2015). Reconstructing sociology: The critical realist approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reed, I., and Lichterman, P. (2017). Toward a pragmatist sociological history. Working paper.Google Scholar
  40. Sharkey, P. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swartz, D. (2002). The sociology of habit: The perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22(S), 61–69.Google Scholar
  43. Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tavory, I., & Eliasoph, N. (2013). Coordinating futures: Toward a theory of anticipation. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 908–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Whitford, J. (2002). Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: Why rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. Theory and Society, 31, 325–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitford, J. (2005). The new old economy: Networks, institutions, and the transformation of American manufacturing. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making: Institutions, power, networks. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winship, C. (2018). Inchoate situations and extra-rational behavior. In H. Staubmann and V. Lidz (Eds.), Rationality in the social sciences (pp. 223–243). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyColby CollegeWatervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations