Skip to main content
Log in

Historically contested concepts: A conceptual history of philanthropy in France, 1712-1914

Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since W. B. Gallie introduced the notion of essentially contested concepts (ECCs) in 1956, social science scholars have increasingly used his framework to analyze key concepts drawing “endless disputes” from contestant users. Despite its merits, the ECC framework has been limited by a neglect of social, cultural, and political contexts, the invisibility of actors, and its ahistorical character. To understand how ECCs evolve and change over time, I use a conceptual history approach to study the concept of philanthropy, recently labeled as an ECC. Using France during classical modernity as a case study, I analyze key events and actors from the concept’s inception in 1712 as a virtue of the Enlightenment to its triumph after 1789 as a secular alternative to Catholic charity, until its decline at the end of the nineteenth century as a new consensus emerged around the concept of solidarity. By introducing the notion of historically contested concepts, I make several contributions to research on ECCs, conceptual contestation, and conceptual change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. In particular, I used Gallica, the open access, digital library of Bibliothèque nationale de France (BNF) containing more than 4 million documents, as well as Sudoc, France’s academic documentation system, which comprises more than 12 million items.

  2. His note on virtue (Vertu) contains this statement: “As to charity, is it not that which the Greeks and Romans understood by humanity—love of your neighbor? This love is nothing, if it does not act; beneficence is therefore the only true virtue.”

  3. Fénelon’s famous controversy with Bossuet about quietism led him to be condemned by Pope Innocent XII in 1699 and banned from the King Louis XIV’s court. While he was held in high esteem by many Enlightenment philosophers and freemasons, Catholics were more divided about his legacy overall (Hogu 1920).

  4. In 1757, Turgot wrote the article “Foundations” for Diderot & d’Alembert’s Encyclopédie and was very critical of several shortcomings of charitable foundations: vanity of founders, loss of tax revenues for the State, immobility of capital, mismanagement and obsolescence over the years.

  5. State councilor Montyon created prizes to reward virtue, literary and scientific achievements. Gérando, a pioneering anthropologist, developed empiric method of visiting the poor to understand the cause of their ills. Champion, a Parisian jeweler wearing a distinctive “little blue coat,” gave away all his fortune to the poor (Duprat 1993).

  6. In a letter to Ms. Royer de Chantepie written in March 1857, Flaubert wrote: “I hate despotism. I am a rabid liberal, which is why socialism seems to me a pedantic horror that will spell the death of all art and morality.”

References

  • Adcock, R. (2005). What is a concept? Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper no. 1, International Political Science Association.

  • Aeschylus. (1983). In M. Griffith (Ed.), Prometheus Bound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, E. (1997). France. In L. M. Salamon & H. K. Anheier (Eds.), Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis (pp. 103–127). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Archambault, E. (2001). Historical roots of the nonprofit sector in France. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 204–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, T. (1998). Conceptual history and the history of political thought. In I. Hampsher-Monk, K. Tilmans, & F. van Vree (Eds.), History of concepts: Comparative perspectives (pp. 74–86). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, T. (2002). Confessions of a conceptual historian. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 6(1), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, T., Farr, J., & Hanson, R. L. (1989). Political innovation and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzac, H. de (1900). The Village Rector. (K. P. Wormeley, Trans.) (Vol. 32). Boston: Hardy, Pratt & Co.

  • Bastiat, F. (1850). La Loi. Paris: Guillaumin et cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaurepaire, P.-Y. (2008). De la charité à la philanthropie, de la bienfaisance à la lutte contre l’exclusion. Voyage au cœur du projet philosophique et de société de la franc-maçonnerie (XVIIIe-XXIe siècles). La Pensée et les Hommes, 51(66), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bec, C. (Ed.). (1994). Philanthropies et politiques sociales en Europe: (XVIIIe-XXe siècles). Paris: Anthropos-Economica.

  • Blais, M.-C. (2008). La solidarité. Le Télémaque, 1(33), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bödeker, H. E. (1998). Concept, meaning, discourse: Begriffsgeschichte reconsidered. In I. Hampsher-Monk, K. Tilmans, & F. van Vree (Eds.), History of concepts: Comparative perspectives (pp. 51–64). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothello, J., & Djelic, M.-L. (2018). Evolving conceptualizations of organizational environmentalism: A path generation account. Organization Studies, 39(1), 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. (1896). Solidarité. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F. (2006). Flaubert: A Life. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheli, M., & Wadhwani, R. D. (Eds.). (2014). Organizations in time: History, theory, methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care, N. S. (1973). On fixing social concepts. Ethics, 84(1), 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R. (1995). Les Métamorphoses de la question sociale: Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantin, J.-P. (2003). Les adeptes de la théophilanthropie. Rives méditerranéennes, 2(14), 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateaubriand, F.-R. de (1902). The Memoirs of Francois René Vicomte de Chateaubriand, Sometime Ambassador to England. (A. Texeira de Mattos, Trans.) (Vols. 1–6, Vol. 6). London: Freemantle.

  • Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. A. (1964). Turgot’s critique of perpetual endowments. French Historical Studies, 3(4), 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. B. (2003). Epilogue: The European comparison. In L. J. Friedman & M. D. McGarvie (Eds.), Charity, philanthropy, and civility in American history (pp. 385–411). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coing, H. (1981). Remarks on the history of foundations and their role in the promotion of learning. Minerva, 19(2), 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., Hidalgo, F. D., & Maciuceanu, A. O. (2006). Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(3), 211–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachez, R. (2015). Histoire de la franc-maçonnerie française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, S. (2011). Philanthropy as an essentially contested concept. Voluntas, 23(3), 535–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1992). A genealogy of the government of poverty. Economy and Society, 21(3), 215–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debiesse, F. (2007). Le mécénat. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedeyan, N. (1983). Histoire de la Société philanthropique de Paris: 1780–1980. Paris: Société philanthropique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delalande, N. (2011). L’entrée en philanthropie des Rothschild : l’hôpital israélite de Paris (1852-1914). Archives juives, 44(1), 54–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L. (1998). Exporting the American model: The post-war transformation of European business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L., & Bothello, J. (2013). Limited liability and its moral hazard implications: The systemic inscription of instability in contemporary capitalism. Theory and Society, 42(6), 589–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, H. (1971). The principle of self-emancipation in Marx and Engels. Socialist Register, 8, 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duprat, C. (1993). Le temps des philanthropes: la philanthropie parisienne des Lumières à la monarchie de Juillet. Paris: Éd. du C.T.H.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duprat, C. (1996). Usage et pratiques de la philanthropie: Pauvreté, action sociale et lien social à Paris, au cours du premier XIXe siècle (Vol. 1-2). Paris: Comité d’histoire de la sécurité sociale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, D. (2007). Concepts. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttps://www.iep.utm.edu/concepts/. Accessed 4 Nov 2018.

  • Elwitt, S. (1986). The Third Republic defended: Bourgeois reform in France, 1880–1914. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1845). Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England. Leipzig: Otto Wigand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, F. (1986). L’état providence. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J. (1982). Historical concepts in political science: The case of “revolution.”. American Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 688–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J. (1989). Understanding conceptual change politically. In T. Ball, J. Farr, & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Political innovation and conceptual change (pp. 24–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J. (2004). Social capital: A conceptual history. Political Theory, 32(1), 6–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fénelon, F. de. (1830). Dialogues des morts. In Oeuvres Choisies (Vol. 2). Paris: Hachette.

  • Fisher, D. (1983). The role of philanthropic foundations in the reproduction and production of hegemony: Rockefeller foundations and the social sciences. Sociology, 17(2), 206–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C., Kennedy, M. T., & Davis, G. F. (2012). How Golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science, 23(4), 1077–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76-100). New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Fourier, C. (1847). De l’Anarchie industrielle et scientifique. Paris: Librairie phalanstérienne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (1994). Political concepts and ideological morphology. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2(2), 140–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. J., & McGarvie, M. D. (Eds.). (2003). Charity, philanthropy, and civility in American history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. (2006). Strategic giving: The art and science of philanthropy. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, F. (1981). Interpreting the French revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, F. (1995). Revolutionary France: 1770–1880. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier, A., Pache, A.-C., & Mossel, V. (2015). Giving in France: A philanthropic renewal after decades of distrust. In P. Wiepking & F. Handy (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy (pp. 137–154). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gérando, J.-M. de (1821). Le visiteur du pauvre. Paris: Jules Renouard.

  • Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Agency, structure. In Central problems in social theory (pp. 49–95). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. J., Gill, D. J., & Roulet, T. J. (2018). Constructing trustworthy historical narratives: Criteria, principles and techniques: Trustworthy historical narratives. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A User’s guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gothot-Mersch, C. (1997). Autour de la philanthropie. Réseaux de motifs obsessionnels chez Flaubert Bulletin de l’académie royale de langue et de littérature françaises de Belgique, (3–4), 397–410.

  • Green, S. E., Li, Y., & Nohria, N. (2009). Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampsher-Monk, I., Tilmans, K., & van Vree, F. (Eds.). (1998). History of concepts: Comparative perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C., Maclean, M., Gordon, J., & Shaw, E. (2011). Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. Business History, 53(3), 425–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzfeld, H. (1971). Du paupérisme à la sécurité sociale, 1850–1940. Nancy: Presses universitaires de Nancy.

  • Hayward, J. E. S. (1959). Solidarity: The social history of an idea in nineteenth century France. International Review of Social History, 4(2), 261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, G. D. (1952). Chevalier Ramsay. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1987). The age of empire, 1875–1914. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogu, L. (1920). Le mythe de Fénelon. Revue d’histoire de l’Église de France, 6(30), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilchman, W. F., Katz, S. N., & Queen, E. L. (1998). Philanthropy in the World’s traditions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1982). Charity and Bienfaisance: The treatment of the poor in the Montpellier region 1740–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J., & Mun, E. (2017). Does diffusion make an institutionally contested practice legitimate? Shareholder responses to downsizing in Japan, 1973–2005. Organization Studies, 38(10), 1347–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettering, S. (1988). Gift-giving and patronage in early modern France. French History, 2(2), 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu, L. K. (1992). Recent views on conceptual structure. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 500–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2002). The practice of conceptual history: Timing history, spacing concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambelet, A. (2014). La philanthropie. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, É. (1890). Les habitués des prisons de Paris: étude d’anthropologie et de psychologie criminelles. Paris: G. Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leglaive-Perani, C. (2011). De la charité à la philanthropie. Archives Juives, 44(1), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroux, P. (1840). De l’humanité, de son principe et de son avenir. Paris: Perrotin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustick, I. S. (1996). History, historiography, and political science: Multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 90(03), 605–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 609–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population. London: J. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, J.-L. (1999). Histoire du don en France de 1800 à 1939: dons et legs charitables, pieux et philanthropiques. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (Eds.). (1999). Concepts: Core readings. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1844). Die heilige Familie. Frankfurt: Lowenthal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiez, A. (1903). La théophilanthropie et le culte décadaire, 1796–1801: essai sur l’histoire religieuse de la révolution. Paris: Félix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavidal, J., & Laurent, É. (Eds.). (1867). Séance du mardi 19 mars 1793. In Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860. Première série, 1787 à 1799. (Vol. 60, pp. 322–328). Paris: P. Dupont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. (1991). The divided path: The German influence on social reform in France after 1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsushima, N. (2017). Aménager, subvertir et contester l’ordre électoral. Genèses, 109, 32–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naville, F. M. L. (1836). De la charité légale. Paris: Dufart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, P. (1994). The welfare state in France, 1870-1914. French Historical Studies, 18(3), 821–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2002). The history of concepts as a style of political theorizing Quentin Skinner’s and Reinhart Koselleck’s subversion of normative political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 1(1), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payton, R. L. (1988). Philanthropy: Voluntary action for the public good. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, D. H. (1972). The French revolution of 1830. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinloche, A. (1889). La réforme de l’éducation en Allemagne au dix-huitième siècle: Basedow et le philanthropinisme. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, P.-J. (1848). Solution du problème social. Paris: Pilhes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, P.-J. (1863). Du principe fédératif et de la nécessité de reconstituer le parti de la révolution. Paris: E. Dentu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2018). Just giving: Why philanthropy is failing democracy and how it can do better. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R., Cordelli, C., & Bernholz, L. (2016). Philanthropy in democratic societies: History, institutions, values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M. (1995). The history of political and social concepts: A critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (1981). La crise de l’État-providence. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (1990). L’État en France: de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector. I: The question of definitions. Voluntas, 3(2), 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. (2007). The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1984). Guidelines for concept analysis. In Social science concepts: A systematic analysis (pp. 15–85). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. H. (1990). Quality and quantity: The quest for biological regeneration in twentieth-century France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133, 531–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics: Regarding Method (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. B. (1997). The ideology of charity, the image of the English poor law, and debates over the right to assistance in France, 1830–1905. The Historical Journal, 40(4), 997–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. R. (1995a). Narrating and naturalizing civil society and citizenship theory: The place of political culture and the public sphere. Sociological Theory, 13(3), 229–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. R. (1995b). What’s political or cultural about political culture and the public sphere? Toward an historical sociology of concept formation. Sociological Theory, 13(2), 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1851). Social statics. London: John Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernø, S. (2009). Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, E. (1844). Les mystères de Paris. Paris: Librairie Charles Gosselin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulek, M. (2010a). On the modern meaning of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulek, M. (2010b). On the classical meaning of Philanthrôpía. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 385–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de. (1997). Memoir on Pauperism. (S. Drescher, Trans.). London: Civitas.

  • Tombs, R. (1996). France 1814 - 1914. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topalov, C. (1996). Langage de la réforme et déni du politique. Le débat entre assistance publique et bienfaisance privée, 1889-1903. Genèses, 23(1), 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topalov, C. (1999). Laboratoires du nouveau siècle: la nébuleuse réformatrice et ses réseaux en France, 1880–1914. Paris: EHESS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint, F.-V. (1748). Les Moeurs. Lausanne: Bousquet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veyne, P. (1990). Bread and circuses: Historical sociology and political pluralism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villermé, L.-R. (1840). Tableau de l’état physique et moral des ouvriers employés dans les manufactures de coton, de laine et de soie. Paris: Jules Renouard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire. (1764). Dictionnaire philosophique portatif. Genève: Gabriel Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (2002). Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)? Law and Philosophy, 21(2), 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. H. (1983). Origins of the French welfare state: Poor relief in the Third Republic, 1871-1914. French Historical Studies, 13(1), 47–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiepking, P., & Handy, F. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunz, O. (2011). Philanthropy in America: A history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my colleagues Joel Bothello, Anne-Claire Pache, and Greg Molecke for their wise suggestions on earlier drafts of this article. Thank you to Eugénie Bapst for her precious help on data collection and tracking definitions in dictionaries and encyclopedias. I also benefited from the guidance of archivists at the Hôtel de Ville and CEDIAS-Musée social libraries in Paris. Finally, I thank the Editors and the reviewers of Theory and Society for their insightful comments. A version of this article was presented at the European Research Network on Philanthropy conference in Copenhagen, 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Gautier.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gautier, A. Historically contested concepts: A conceptual history of philanthropy in France, 1712-1914. Theor Soc 48, 95–129 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-09335-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-09335-z

Keywords

Navigation