Theory and Society

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 177–199 | Cite as

Professors and politics: Noam Chomsky’s contested reputation in the United States and Canada

Article

Abstract

There is an extensive literature comparing the politics, sociology and economics of the United States and Canada, but very little work comparing the role that public intellectuals play in the space of public opinion and how their ideas are received in both nations simultaneously. Noam Chomsky provides a theoretically useful example of an established academic and public intellectual whose reputation is deeply contested in both countries. Our comparative case study offers leverage to contribute to debates on the sociology of knowledge, reputations, intellectuals, and the politics of professors using data from six major Canadian and American newspapers from 1995–2009 and an innovative coding of media portrayal. Earlier work has demonstrated that Chomsky is discussed as a public intellectual more prominently in Canada than in the United States (McLaughlin and Townsley in Canadian Review of Sociology, 48(4):341–368, 2011). Here we examine the comparative construction of a “public intellectual” reputation in the context of significant political change. We document small differences between the Canadian and American receptions of Chomsky, show change in the patterns of portrayal and number of publications over time, and offer an analysis of differences between political attacks and consecrations. We demonstrate more engagement with Chomsky’s political view in Canada than in the United States, a rise in Chomsky’s fame post 9/11, and illustrate clear political patterns in attempts to marginalize him.

Keywords

Contested reputations News media Politics of professors Public intellectuals Public opinion US and Canadian newspapers 

References

  1. Albanese, P., Rauhala, A., Ferns, C., Johnstone, J., Lam, J., & Atack, E. (2010). Hiding the elephant: Child care coverage in four daily newspapers. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(5), 817–836.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, D. E., & Lambert, R. (1990). Socialization into dominant vs. counter ideology among university-educated Canadians. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 27, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, D., Grabb, E., & Johnston, W. A. (1990). The values of Canadians and Americans: A critical analysis and reassessment. Social Forces, 68(3), 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsky, R. (1998). Noam Chomsky: A life of dissent. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benson, R. (2013). Shaping immigration news: A French-American comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bromberg, M., & Fine, G. A. (2002). Resurrecting the red: Pete Seeger and the purification of difficult reputations. Social Forces, 80(4), 1135–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brym, R. J. (1980). Intellectuals and politics. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Brym, R. J., & Nakhaie, M. R. (1999). Political attitudes of Canadian professors. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 24(3), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byers, M. (2007). Intent for a nation: What is Canada for? Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, M. E. (2005). Who owns democracy?: Explaining the long-running debate over Canadian/American value differences. Canadian Review of Sociology, 42(3), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Berlin: Mouton & Co..Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. (1967). The responsibility of intellectuals. The New York Review of Books http://chomsky.info/articles/19670223.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2012.
  14. Chomsky, N. (1969). American power and the new mandarins. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N. (1973). For reasons of state. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  16. Chomsky, N. (1974). Peace in the Middle East. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Chomsky, N. (1983). Fateful triangle: The United States, Israel and the Palestinians. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chomsky, N. (1985). Turning the tide: U.S. interventionism in Central America and the struggle for peace. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chomsky, N. (1987a). On power and ideology: The Managua lectures. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chomsky, N. (1987b). The Chomsky reader. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  21. Chomsky, N. (1989). Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  22. Chomsky, N. (1991). Deterring democracy. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  23. Chomsky, N. (1997). Objectivity and liberal scholarship. Detroit: Black and Red.Google Scholar
  24. Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  25. Chomsky, N. (2003). Hegemony or survival: America's quest for global dominance. New York: Henry Holt and Company LLC.Google Scholar
  26. Chomsky, N. (2005). Imperial ambitions: Conversations on the post-9/11 World. New York: Henry Holt and Company LLC.Google Scholar
  27. Chomsky, N. (2006). Failed states: The abuse of power and the assault on democracy. New York: Henry Holt and Company LLC.Google Scholar
  28. Chomsky, N. (2011). 9–11: Was there an alternative? New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  29. Chomsky, N. (2012). Occupy. New York: First Zuccotti Park Press.Google Scholar
  30. Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1973). Counter-revolutionary violence: Bloodbaths in fact & propaganda. Andover: Warner Modular Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1979a). The Washington connection and third world fascism. Montreal: Black Rose Press.Google Scholar
  32. Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1979b). After the cataclysm: Post-war Indochina and the reconstruction of imperial ideology. Montreal: Black Rose Press.Google Scholar
  33. Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1988). Manufacturing consent. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  34. Collier, P., & Horowitz, D. (2003). The anti-Chomsky reader. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  35. Collini, S. (2006). Absent minds: Intellectuals in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Crossman, J., Vincent, J., & Speed, H. (2007). The times they are a-changin'—Gender comparisons in three national newspapers of the 2004 Wimbledon Championships. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 42(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2011). The stratification of universities: Structural inequality in Canada and the United States. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eyal, G., & Buchholz, L. (2010). From the sociology of intellectuals to the sociology of interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ferree, M. M. (2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 109(2), 304–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fine, G. A. (2001). Difficult reputations: Collective memories of the evil, inept and controversial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Fine, G. A. (2006). Notorious support: The America first committee and the personalization of policy. Mobilization: An International Journal, 11(4), 405–426.Google Scholar
  42. Fine, G. A. (2012). Sticky reputations—The politics of collective memory in Midcentury America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Fiss, P. C., & Hirsch, P. M. (2005). The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gaszo, A. (2004). Women's inequality in the workplace as framed in news discourse: Refracting from gender ideology. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 41(4), 449–473.Google Scholar
  45. Grabb, E., Curtis, J., & Baer, D. (2000). Defining moments and recurring myths: Comparing Canadians and Americans after the American Revolution. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 37(4), 373–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gross, N. (2013). Why are professors liberal and why do conservatives care? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hamilton, R. F., & Hargens, L. L. (1993). The politics of the professors: Self- identifications, 1969–1984. Social Forces, 71(3), 603–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Horn, M. (1999). Academic freedom in Canada: A history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Horowitz, D. (2006). The professors: The 101 most dangerous academics in America. Washington, DC: Regnery.Google Scholar
  50. Jacobs, R. N., & Townsley, E. (2008). On the communicative geography of global sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 33(3), 497–520.Google Scholar
  51. Jacobs, R. N., & Townsley, E. (2011). The space of opinion: Media intellectuals and the public sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jacoby, R. (1987). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  53. Jansen, R. S. (2007). Resurrection and appropriation: Reputational trajectories, memory work, and the political use of historical figures. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 953–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kadushin, C. (1974). The American intellectual elite. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
  55. Kauppi, N. (1996). French intellectual nobility: Institutional and symbolic transformations in the post-Sartrian era. New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  56. Kowalchuck, L., & McLaughlin, N. (2009). Mapping the social space of opinion: Public sociology and the op-ed in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 34(3), 697–728.Google Scholar
  57. Lamont, M. (1987). How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 574–622.Google Scholar
  58. Lee, J. (1992). Media portrayals of male and female Olympic athletes: Analyses of newspaper accounts of the 1984 and the 1988 summer games. International Review for Sociology of Sport, 27(3), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lipset, S. M. (1990). Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. McLaughlin, N. (2005a). The global public intellectual, academic professions and the intellectual hero: Reflections on Edward Said. The Discourse of Sociological Practice, 7(1–2), 161–174.Google Scholar
  61. McLaughlin, N. (2005b). Canada's impossible science: Historical and institutional origins of the coming crisis in Anglo-Canadian sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  62. McLaughlin, N., & Townsley, E. (2011). Contexts of cultural diffusion: A case study of 'public intellectual' debates in English Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology, 48(4), 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McLaughlin, N., & Trilupaitye, S. (2013). The international circulation of attacks and the reputational consequences of local context: George Soros’s difficult reputation in Russia, Post-Soviet Lithuania and the United States. Cultural Sociology, 7(4), 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McLevey, J. (2014). Think tanks, funding, and the politics of policy knowledge in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology, 51(1), 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. O'Neill, T. (2006). Canada's nuttiest professors. The Western Standard http://www.westernstandard.ca/website/article.php?id=1998&start=0.
  66. Posner, R. A. (2001). Public intellectuals: A study of decline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sapiro, G. (2003). Forms of politicization in the French literary field. Theory and Society, 32, 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. New York: St. Martin‘s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Searle, J. (1972). Chomsky's revolution in linguistics. New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
  70. Small, M. (1989). The New York Times and the Toronto Globe and Mail view anti-Vietnam War demonstrations, 1965-1969. Peace and Change, 14(3), 324–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Snow, D. A., Burke Rochford, E., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sperlich, W. (2006). Noam Chomsky. London: Reaktion Books Ltd..Google Scholar
  73. Swartz, D. (2003). From critical sociology to public intellectual: Pierre Bourdieu and politics. Theory and Society, 32, 791–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Swartz, D. (2012). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  75. Townsley, E. (2006). The public intellectual trope in the United States. The American Sociologist, 37(3), 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weiss, C. (1974). What America's leaders read. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 38(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wiseman, N. (2013). The public intellectual in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations