Theory and Society

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 501–529 | Cite as

Turning distaste into taste: context-specific habitus and the practical congruity of culture

  • Sharon Cornelissen


This article proposes a rethinking of Bourdieu’s habitus as context-specific, multiple, and decentralized based on nine months of participant-observation fieldwork with dumpster divers in New York City. Dumpster divers are mostly white, college-educated people in their twenties and thirties who eat food from retail trash as a lifestyle choice. Sociologists have recently theorized culture as a fragmented, incoherent “toolkit” of cultured capacities acquired throughout the lifetime. Bourdieu on the contrary, theorized socialized culture as habitus, a relatively durable, classed structure acquired during childhood. While he recognized the possibility of acquiring “specific” habitus (Bourdieu 2000) later in life, he never developed the theoretical implications of socialization across multiple contexts. Building on ethnographic evidence of dumpster divers’ contradictory pursuit of food taste through the distasteful behavior of eating from the trash, I develop an alternative model of habitus as interlinked bundles of dispositions acquired in specific contexts. To theorize the bundled quality of habitus, I introduce what I call the practical congruity of dispositions. I show how rather than being disparate elements of a cultural repertoire, ways of seeing, common sense, dexterity, and orientations “make sense” in conjunction as actors mobilize them in specific contexts: dumpster diving acquires a commonsensical character based on the practical sense practitioners acquire. My understanding of habitus goes beyond the fragmentation assumed in notions of culture as a repertoire of cultured capacities, on the one hand, and the continuity and coherence premised in notions of primary and secondary habitus, on the other hand.


Dumpster diving Embodied knowledge Habitus Practical congruity Taste and distaste Toolkit theory 



The author wishes to thank Iddo Tavory, Paul DiMaggio, Mitchell Duneier, Timothy Pachirat, Rachel Sherman, Paul Willis, William Kornblum, the Theory and Society Editors and reviewers, and her colleagues at the New School for Social Research and Princeton University for their helpful comments and advice. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the 2013 Chicago Ethnography conference, the 2014 American Sociological Association Annual meeting, and the 2014 New School Sociology conference.


  1. Atkinson, W. (2010). Phenomenological additions to the Bourdieusian toolbox: two problems for Bourdieu, two solutions from Schutz. Sociological Theory, 28, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, W. (2011). From sociological fictions to social fictions: some Bourdieusian reflections on the concepts of ‘institutional habitus’ and ‘family habitus. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(3), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard, A. (2011). ‘Waving the banana’ at capitalism: political theater and social movement strategy among New York’s ‘freegan’ dumpster divers. Ethnography, 12(3), 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnard, A. (2016). Freegans: Diving into the wealth of food waste in America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H. S. (1953). Becoming a marihuana user. American Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benzecry, C. E. (2009). Becoming a fan: on the seductions of opera. Qualitative Sociology, 32(2), 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Is a disinterested act possible? In Practical reason: On the theory of action (pp. 75–91). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sketch for a self-analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brubaker, R. (1985). Rethinking classical theory: the sociological vision of Pierre Bourdieu. Theory and Society, 14, 745–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brubaker, R. (1993). Social theory as habitus. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 212–234). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bryson, B. (1996). “Anything but heavy metal”: symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 884–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cerulo, K. A. (2010). Mining the intersections of cognitive sociology and neuroscience. Poetics, 38, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Crossley, N. (2004). The circuit trainer’s habitus: reflexive body techniques and the sociality of the workout. Body & Society, 10(1), 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desmond, M. (2006). Becoming a firefighter. Ethnography, 7(4), 387–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DiMaggio, P. (1979). Review essay: on Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1460–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Douglas, M. (2002 [1966]). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Intelligence without representation - Merleau-Ponty's critique of mental representation: the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  25. Durkheim, E. (2001 [1912]). The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ferrell, J. (2006). Empire of scrounge: Inside the urban underground of dumpster diving, trash picking, and street scavenging. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  28. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  29. Goldberg, A. (2011). Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: the case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. American Journal of Sociology, 116(5), 1397–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gowan, T. (2010). Hobos, hustlers and backsliders: Homeless in San Francisco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ignatow, G. (2009). Culture and embodied cognition: moral discourses in internet support groups for overeaters. Social Forces, 88(2), 643–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnston, J., & Baumann, S. (2007). Democracy versus distinction: a study of omnivorousness in gourmet food writing. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 165–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kant, I. (1995 [1781]). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Khan, S. R. (2011). Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul’s school. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lahire, B. (2003). From the habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions: towards a sociology at the level of the individual. Poetics, 31, 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lahire, B. (2011). The plural actor. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1974]). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lizardo, O. (2012). The three phases of Bourdieu’s U.S. reception: comment on Lamont. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2010). Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology. Poetics, 38, 204–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Martin, J. L. (2010). Life’s a beach but you’re an ant, and other unwelcome news for the sociology of culture. Poetics, 38, 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Medina, M. (2007). The world’s scavengers: Salvaging for sustainable consumption and production. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  45. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2014 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  48. Reno, J. (2009). Your trash is someone’s treasure: the politics of value at a Michigan landfill. Journal of Material Culture, 14(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). Structures of the life-world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sudnow, D. (1978). Ways of the hand: The organization of improvised conduct. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review 51: 273–86Google Scholar
  52. Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tavory, I., & Winchester, D. (2012). Experiential careers: the routinization and de-routinization of religious life. Theory and Society, 41(4), 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wacquant, L. (2002). Taking Bourdieu into the field. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 46, 180–186.Google Scholar
  56. Wacquant, L. (2004). Body & soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Wacquant, L. (2011). Habitus as topic and tool: reflections on becoming a prizefighter. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wade, L. (2011). The emancipatory promises of the habitus: Lindy hop, the body, and social change. Ethnography, 12(2), 224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wainwright, S. P., Williams, C., & Turner, B. S. (2006). Varieties of habitus and the embodiment of ballet. Qualitative Research, 6(4), 535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winchester, D. (2008). Embodying the faith: religious practice and the making of a Muslim moral habitus. Social Forces, 86(4), 1753–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations