Dequantifying diversity: affirmative action and admissions at the University of Michigan
- 955 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
To explore the limits of quantification as a form of rationalization, we examine a rare case of dequantification: race-based affirmative action in undergraduate admissions at the University of Michigan. Michigan adopted a policy of holistically reviewing undergraduate applications in 2003, after the US Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional its points-based admissions policy. Using archival and ethnographic data, we trace the adoption, evolution, and undoing of Michigan’s quantified system of admissions decision-making between 1964 and 2004. In a context in which opponents of the system had legal avenues to engage a powerful outside authority, we argue that three internal features of the University’s quantified admissions policy contributed to its demise: its transparency, the instability of the categories it quantified, and the existence of qualitative alternatives. Our analysis challenges the presumed durability and inevitability of quantification by identifying its vulnerabilities and suggests that quantification should be understood as a matter of degree rather than a simple binary.
Keywords
Quantification Organizational routines Rationalization Race Gratz GrutterNotes
Acknowledgments
We thank Emily Bosk, Jamie Budnick, John Carson, Tony Chen, Russ Funk, Gabrielle Hecht, Steve Hoffman, Greta Krippner, Kathy Lin, John Mohr, Jason Owen-Smith, Michelle Phelps, Rachael Pierotti, Elizabeth Young, and audiences at the Economic Sociology Workshop and the Science, Technology, and Society Colloquium at Michigan, the Society for Social Studies of Science in Cleveland, and the American Sociological Association in Denver for helpful comments on earlier versions of this work. This work was supported by the American Bar Foundation, the National Science Foundation [Grant No. 0418547], the Northwestern University Center for Legal Studies, and the Northwestern University Graduate School.
References
- Alder, K. (2002). The measure of all things. The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Anderson, E. (2002). Integration, affirmative action, and strict scrutiny. New York University Law Review, 77, 1195–1271.Google Scholar
- Ayres, I., & Foster, S. (2007). Don’t tell, Don’t ask: narrow tailoring after Grutter and Gratz. Texas Law Review, 85(3), 517–583.Google Scholar
- Beckert, J., & Aspers, P. (2011). The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. USA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berrey, E. C. (2011). Why diversity became orthodox in higher education, and how it changed the meaning of race on campus. Critical Sociology, 37(5), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berrey, E. C. (2015). The enigma of diversity. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Brown-Nagin, T. (2005). The transformative racial politics of Justice Thomas?: the Grutter V. Bollinger opinion. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(3), 787–807.Google Scholar
- Brune, S. (1994). Conflict and conciliation: a review of the black action movement strike at the University of Michigan. Michigan Journal of Political Science, 5, 39–66.Google Scholar
- Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Callon, M. 1998. “An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology.” Pp. 244–269 in The Laws of the Markets. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Christin, Angele. 2015. “Counting clicks: quantification and commensuration in online journalism in the United States and France.” Working paper.Google Scholar
- Daston, Lorraine J., and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. Zone.Google Scholar
- Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
- Espeland, W. N. (1998). The struggle for water. University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Espeland, W. (2009). Thinking about standards in qualitative research. In M. Lamont & P. White (Eds.), Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research (pp. 65–68). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49(03), 401–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Espeland, W. N., & Vannebo, B. I. (2007). Accountability, quantification, and law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foucault, Michel. 1994. The order of things. Vintage.Google Scholar
- Fourcade, M. (2011). Cents and sensibility: economic valuation and the nature of ‘nature’. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1721–1777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gerring, John. 2009. “What standards are (or might be) shared?“ in Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research, edited by Michele Lamont and Patricia White. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, pp. 107–123.Google Scholar
- Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Gover, K. (2008). Genealogy as continuity: explaining the growing tribal preference for descent rules in membership governance in the United States. American Indian Law Review, 33(1), 243–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gover, K. (2010). Comparative tribal constitutionalism: membership governance in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Law & Social Inquiry, 35(3), 689–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an anthropological theory of value. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenland, F. R., Chen, A. S., & Stulberg, L. M. (2010). Beyond the open door: the origins of affirmative action in undergraduate admissions at Cornell and the University of Michigan. In Paper presented at the policy history conference, June 4, 2010. Columbus: OH.Google Scholar
- Hacking, I. (1982). Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers. Humanities in Society, 5(3/4), 279–295.Google Scholar
- Hacking, I. (2005). Why race still matters. Daedalus, 134(1), 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haydu, J. (1998). Making use of the past: time periods as cases to compare and as sequences of problem solving. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 339–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hirschman, Daniel. 2015. “Inventing the economy (or, how We learned to stop worrying and love the GDP).” Ph.D Dissertation.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, JL. 2002. “Affirmative action as culture war.” In A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, edited by David Goldberg and John Solomos, pp. 282–303. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Holm, P. (2007). “which way is up on Callon?” in MacKenzie, Donald, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu Do Economists Make Markets?, pp. In 225–243. Princeton University: Press.Google Scholar
- Huault, I., & Rainelli-Weiss, H. (2011). A market for weather risk? Conflicting metrics, attempts at compromise, and limits to commensuration. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1395–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hyman, L. (2011). Debtor nation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- ICTMN (Indian Country Today Media Network). 2003. “Blood quantum wins at flathead; membership decline predicted.” Jan. 24.Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, Sheila. 1991. “Acceptable Evidence in a Pluralistic Society.” In Mayo, D. & R. Follander Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, pp. 29–65. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Karabel, Jerome. 2005. The chosen. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Killgore, L. (2009). Merit and competition in selective college admissions. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kirkland, A., & Hansen, B. B. (2011). ‘how do I bring diversity?’ race and class in the college admissions essay. Law & Society Review, 45(1), 103–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krippner, G. R. (2013). Possessive collectivism: ownership and the politics of credit access in late-twentieth century America. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lamont, Michele, Stefan Beljean, and Matthew Clair. 2013. “What is missing? Cultural processes and pathways to inequality.” Socioeconomic Review.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lemann, N. (1999). The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. Straus and Giroux: Farrar.Google Scholar
- Lipson, D. N. (2001). Affirmative action as We Don’t know it: the rise of individual assessment in undergraduate admissions at UC-Berkeley and UT-Austin. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 23, 137–184.Google Scholar
- Lipson, D. N. (2011). The resilience of affirmative action in the 1980s: innovation, isomorphism, and institutionalization in university admissions. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luker, K. (2008). Salsa dancing into the social sciences. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- MacLean, N. (2006). Freedom Is Not Enough: The Opening of the American Workplace. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Marron, D. (2007). ‘lending by numbers’: credit scoring and the constitution of risk within American consumer credit. Economy and Society, 36(1), 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, B. (1967). Ruckus over race has relevance to other universities. Science, 156(3779), 1209–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, R. L., Berrey, E., & Nielsen, L. B. (2008). Divergent paths: conflicting conceptions of employment discrimination in law and the social sciences. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: a Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Poon, M. (2007). Scorecards as devices for consumer credit: the case of fair, Isaac & Company Incorporated. The Sociological Review, 55, 284–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Prewitt, K. (2005). Racial classification in America: where do We go from here? Daedalus Winter, 5–17.Google Scholar
- Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simon, J. (1988). The ideological effects of actuarial practices. Law & Society Review, 22(4), 771–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skrentny, J. D. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Skrentny, J. D. (2002). The minority rights revolution. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Small, M. (2009). ‘how many cases do I need?’: on science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spruhan, P. (2006). A legal history of blood quantum in Federal Indian Law to 1935. South Dakota Law Review., 51, 1–50.Google Scholar
- Stapleford, T. A. (2009). The Cost Of Living In America: A Political History Of Economic Statistics, 1880–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, J. (2002). The Gatekeepers: Inside the Admissions Process of a Premier College. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Stevens, M. L. (2009). Creating a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Stinchcombe, A. L. (2005). The logic of social research. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Straka, J. W. (2000). A shift in the mortgage landscape: the 1990s move to automated credit evaluations. Journal of Housing Research, 11(2), 207–232.Google Scholar
- Stuart, Guy. 2003. Discriminating Risk: The U.S. Mortgage Lending Industry in the Twentieth Century. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Stulberg, L. M., & Chen, A. S. (2014). The origins of race-conscious affirmative action in undergraduate admissions: a comparative analysis of institutional change in higher education. Sociology of Education, 87(1), 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thelin, J. R. (2004). A history of American higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1922). 1978. Economy and Society: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1958). 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zelizer, V. (1985). Pricing the priceless child. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Zwick, R. (2004). Rethinking the SAT. Psychology Press.Google Scholar