Theory and Society

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 321–354 | Cite as

Cycles of polarization and settlement: diffusion and transformation in the macroeconomic policy field



Innovative theories and policy proposals originating in the economics profession have diffused globally over the past several decades, but these models and policy programs transform as they spread. Existing models of change based on the concept of “paradigm shifts” capture the transformation of the economics profession at a high level of abstraction, but analysis of more concrete policy changes and associated ideas requires developing theory at a lower level of abstraction. I propose a field theoretic model of change based on the concept of cycles of polarization and settlement. According to this model, settlements are characterized by multiple cross-cutting axes of competition and debate in a professional field. Moments of contention emerge when field entrepreneurs successfully build professional movements, resulting in polarization. However, contention is episodic and followed by the emergence of “centripetal forces” which lead a gradual return to the center. I develop this model by examining the case of monetary economics and policy in Latin America, a critical case for studies of the policy influence of economic ideas and experts.


Field theory Economic ideas Latin American economics Monetary policy Professional identity 


  1. Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Almansi, A.A., & Rodriguez, C.A. (1997) Una reforma monetaria contra la desconfianza y la hiperinflación. In J. C. Ávila (Ed.), Convertibilidad: Fundamentación y funcionamiento. Buenos Aires:CEMA Instituto Universitario.Google Scholar
  3. Aspe, P. (1993). Economic transformation the Mexican way. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Babb, S. (2001). Managing Mexico: Economists from nationalism to neoliberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Babb, S. (2007). Embeddedness, inflation, and international regimes: the IMF in the early postwar period. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 128–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babb, S. (2012). The Washington consensus as transnational policy paradigm: its origins, trajectory and likely replacement. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 1–30.Google Scholar
  7. Baldassari, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banco de México. (1996). Informe Anual 1995. Mexico City: Bank of Mexico.Google Scholar
  9. Barletta, N. A., Blejer, M. I., & Landau, L. (1983). Economic liberalization and stabilization policies in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay: Applications of the monetary approach to the balance of payments. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Begg, D. K. H. (1982). The rational expectations revolution in macroeconomics: Theories and evidence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bernanke, B. S., & Mishkin, F. S. (1997). Inflation targeting: a new framework for monetary policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhagwati, J. (1998). The capital myth: the difference between trade in widgets and dollars. Foreign Affairs, 77(3), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biglaiser, G. (2002). Guardians of the Nation? Economists, generals and economic reform in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  14. Blinder, A. S. (1988). The fall and rise of Keynesian economics. The Economic Record, 64(4), 278–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blinder, A. S. (1997). Is there a core of practical macroeconomics that we should all believe? American Economic Review, 87(2), 240–243.Google Scholar
  16. Blinder, Alan S., and Ricardo Reis. 2005. “Understanding the Greenspan Standard.” Paper Presented at the Symposium The Greenspan Era: Lessons for the Future, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Google Scholar
  17. Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bockman, J. (2011). Markets in the name of socialism: The left-wing origins of neoliberalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bockman, J., & Eyal, G. (2002). Eastern Europe as a laboratory for economic knowledge: the transnational roots of neoliberalism. American Journal of Sociology, 108(2), 310–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Description and prescription: The conditions of possibility and the limits of effectiveness. In J. B. Thompson (Ed.), Language and symbolic power (pp. 127–136). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brekhus, W. (1998). A sociology of the unmarked: redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bresser Pereira, L., & Nakano, Y. (1987). The theory of inertial inflation: The foundation of economic reform in Brazil and Argentina. Boulder: Lynne Riener Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Campbell, J. L., & Pederson, O. K. (2001). Introduction: The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. In J. L. Campbell & O. K. Pederson (Eds.), The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis (pp. 1–23). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Cavallo, D. (1999). “The Quality of Money.”  Paper Presented at the University of Paris I – Pantheon Sorbonne.  Available at
  29. Cavallo, D., & Cavallo S. (1996). Lessons from the Stabilization Process in Argentina, 1990–1996. Paper presented at the “Symposium on Achieving Price Stability,” Jackson Hole, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  30. Cavallo, D., & Cottani, J. (1997). Argentina’s convertibility plan and the IMF. American Economic Review, 87(2), 17–22.Google Scholar
  31. Cavallo, D., & de Pablo, J. C. (2001). Pasión por Crear. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar
  32. Chwieroth, J. M. (2007). Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. International Organization, 61, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Chwieroth, J. M. (2010). Capital ideas: The IMF and the rise of financial liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Cordero, R., & Tello, C. (1981). La disputa por la nación: perspectivas y opciones del desarrollo. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  35. Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2002). The internationalization of palace wars: Lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dornbusch, R. (1982). Stabilization policies in developing countries: what have we learned. World Development, 10(9), 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dornbusch, R. (1988). Exchange rates and inflation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Dornbusch, R. (2001). Fewer monies, better monies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dornbusch, R., & Simonsen M. H. (1987). Inflation stabilization with incomes policy support: A review of the experience in Argentina, Brazil and Israel. NBER Working Paper 2153.Google Scholar
  40. Dornbusch, R., & Werner, A. (1994). Mexico: stabilization, reform and no growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1994(1), 253–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fernández, R. B. (1990). What have populists learned from hyperinflation? Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios Macroeconomicos.Google Scholar
  42. Fischer, S. (1987). The Israeli stabilization program, 1985–6. American Economic Review, 77(2), 275–278.Google Scholar
  43. Fischer, S. (2001a). Exchange rate regimes: is the bipolar view correct? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 3–24.Google Scholar
  44. Fischer, S. (2001). Interview with Stanley Fischer. Available at
  45. Fischer, S. (2004). IMF essays from a time of crisis: The international financial system, stabilization and development. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Fischer, S., & Blanchard, O. J. (1989). Lectures on macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Flache, A., & Macy, M. (2011). Small worlds and cultural polarization. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35, 146–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fourcade, M. (2006). The construction of a global profession: the transnationalization of economics. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 145–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fourcade-Gourinchas, M., & Babb, S. (2002). The rebirth of the liberal creed: paths to neoliberalism in four countries. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 533–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Frenkel, J.A., & Mussa M. L. (1980). Monetary and fiscal policies in an open economy. NBER Working Paper 575.Google Scholar
  53. Frenkel, J. A., & Mussa, M. L. (1984). Asset markets, exchange rates and the balance of payments.” NBER Working Paper 1287.Google Scholar
  54. Frickel, S., & Gross, N. (2005). A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review, 70, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  56. Friedman, M. (1970). The counter-revolution in monetary theory. London: Institute for Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  57. Friedman, B. (1978). The theoretical non-debate about monetarism. In T. Mayer (Ed.), The structure of monetarism (pp. 94–112). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  58. Friedman, B. (2008). Monetary policy for emerging marker countries. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 1(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Goodfriend, M. (2007). How the world achieved consensus on monetary policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 47–68.Google Scholar
  60. Gordon, R. J. (2011). The history of the Phillips Curve: consensus and bifurcation. Economica, 78, 10–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hall, P. (1989). Introduction. In P. Hall (Ed.), The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations (pp. 3–26). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Hall, P. (1990). Policy paradigms, experts and the state: The case of macroeconomic policy-making in Britain. In S. Brooks & A.-G. Gagnon (Eds.), Social scientists, policy and the state (pp. 53–78). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  63. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hanke, S., & Schuler, K. (1999). Reflections on exchange rate regimes. Cato Journal, 18(3), 335–344.Google Scholar
  65. Heilbroner, R., & Milberg, W. (1995). The crisis of vision in modern economic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Johnson, H. (1971). The Keynesian revolution and the Monetarist counter-revolution. American Economic Review, 61(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  67. Kiguel, M. A., & Liviatan, N. (1988). Inflationary rigidities and stabilization policies. World Bank Country Economics Working Paper Series 4.Google Scholar
  68. Kirshner, J. (1998). Disinflation, structural change, and distribution. Review of Radical Political Economics, 30(1), 53–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kirshner, J. (1999). Inflation: paper dragon or Trojan horse? Review of International Political Economy, 6(4), 609–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Klein, L. R. (1947). The Keynesian revolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Kogut, B., & Macpherson, J. M. (2007). The decision to privatize: Economists and the construction of ideas and policies. In B. A. Simmons, F. Dobbin, & G. Garrett (Eds.), The global diffusion of markets and democracy (pp. 104–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Krippner, G. R. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Krugman, P. (2009). How did economists get it so wrong? The New York: Times, September 2.Google Scholar
  74. Lindvall, J. (2009). The real but limited influence of expert ideas. World Politics, 61(4), 703–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lucas, R. E. Jr., & Sargent, T. (1979). After Keynesian macroeconomics. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 3(2).Google Scholar
  76. Maman, D., & Rosenhek, Z. (2007). The politics of institutional reform: the ‘declaration of independence’ of the Israeli Central Bank. Review of International Political Economy, 14(2), 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Maman, D., & Rosenhek, Z. (2009). The contested institutionalization of policy paradigm shifts: the adoption of inflation targeting in Israel. Socio-Economic Review, 7, 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mankiw, N. G. (1990). A Quick Refresher Course in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1645–1660.Google Scholar
  79. Mankiw, N. G. (2001). The inexorable and mysterious tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 111, C45–C61.Google Scholar
  80. Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. McNamara, K. R. (1998). The currency of ideas: Monetary politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Montecinos, V., & Markoff, J. (2010). Economists in the Americas. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  83. Mundell, R. (1971). Monetary theory. Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  84. Mundell, R. (1983). The origins and evolution of monetarism. In K. Jansen (Ed.), Monetarism, economic crisis and the Third World (pp. 43–54). London: F. Cass.Google Scholar
  85. Mundell, R. A. (2000). A reconsideration of the twentieth century. American Economic Review, 90(3), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mundell, R. (2001). On the history of the Mundell-Fleming Model. IMF Staff Papers, 47, 215–227.Google Scholar
  87. Mundell, R., & Friedman M. (2001). One world, one money? Policy Options 10–30.Google Scholar
  88. Obstfeld, M. (2003). International macroeconomics: beyond the Mundell-Fleming model. IMF Staff Papers, 47(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
  89. Polak, J. J. (1957). Monetary analysis of income formation and payments problems. IMF Staff Papers, 6(1), 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Polak, J. J. (2001). The two monetary approaches to the balance of payments: Keynesian and Johnsonian. IMF Working Paper WP/01/100.Google Scholar
  91. Prasad, M. (2006). The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  92. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French Gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Reay, M. (2012). The flexible unity of economics. American Journal of Sociology, 118(1), 45–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2004). The modern history of exchange rate arrangements: a reinterpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rogoff, K. (2002). Dornbusch’s overshooting model after twenty-five years. IMF Staff Papers 49.Google Scholar
  96. Romer, C., & Romer, D. (1989). Does monetary policy matter? A new test in the spirit of Friedman and Schwartz. In O. Blanchard & S. Fischer (Eds.), NBER macroeconomics annual (pp. 121–170). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  97. Silva, P. (2008). In the name of reason: Technocrats and politics in Chile. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Silva Herzog Flores, J. (2009). El Banco de México: un banco central heterodoxo. Presented at Bank of Mexico Seminar El banco central en tiempos de crisis. Available at:
  99. Stapleford, T. A. (2011). Positive economics for democratic policy: Milton Friedman, institutionalism and the science of history. In R. Van Horn, P. Mirowski, & T. A. Stapleford (Eds.), Building Chicago economics: New perspectives on the history of America’s most powerful economics program (pp. 3–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Teichman, J. (1997). Mexico and Argentina: economic reform and technocratic decision making. Studies in Comparative International Development, 32(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tobin, J. (1981). The monetarist counter-revolution today–an appraisal. The Economic Journal, 91(361), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Valdés, J. G. (1995). Pinochet’s economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Whitman, M. N. V., Branson, W. H., Fand, D. I., Krause, L. B., & Salant, W. S. (1975). Global monetarism and the monetary approach to the balance of payments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1975(3), 491–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Woodruff, D. M. (2005). Boom, gloom, doom: balance sheets, monetary fragmentation, and the politics of financial crisis in Argentina and Russia. Politics and Society, 33(1), 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carlos III-Juan March Institute of Social SciencesCarlos III UniversityGetafeSpain

Personalised recommendations