Abstract
This essay provides an analytical review of David Swartz’s book on Bourdieu’s political sociology. I argue that among its many virtues, the book presents Bourdieu’s ideas in an accessible and synthetic manner, adding clarity to what is a complex and often contradictory theoretical system. In addition to assessing the book’s contributions, I draw inspiration from Swartz’s work to point out some of the limitations of the Bourdieusian perspective and identify promising avenues for the further elaboration of this approach through empirical research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Domhoff, G. W. (1967). Who rules America? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
Go, J. (2011). Patterns of empire: The British and American empires, 1688 to present. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lizardo, O. (2012). The three phases of Bourdieu’s U.S. Reception: Comment on Lamont. Sociological Forum, 27, 238–244.
Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power (Vol. I: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in. In P. E. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3–43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Starr, P. (2007). Freedom's power: The true force of liberalism. New York: Basic Books.
Steinmetz, G. (2007). The Devil’s handwriting: Precoloniality and the German colonial state in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonikowski, B. The promise of Bourdieusian political sociology. Theor Soc 44, 385–391 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9246-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9246-7