Theory and Society

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 65–94 | Cite as

Deep culture in action: resignification, synecdoche, and metanarrative in the moral panic of the Salem Witch Trials

Article

Abstract

Sociological research on moral panics, long understood as “struggles for cultural power,” has focused on the social groups and media conditions that enable moral panics to emerge, and on the consequences of moral panics for the social control systems of societies. In this article I turn instead to modeling the specific cultural process of how the conditions for a moral panic are turned into an actual moral panic, moving the understanding of moral panic away from its Durkheimian origins and towards a process-relational cultural sociology. Drawing on Roland Barthes’ theory of myth and Kenneth Burke’s dramatism, the paper posits the cultural process of resignification via synecdoche and metanarrative as the driver of the disproportion, concern, hostility, consensus, and volatility of moral panics. This process can be carefully traced in the case of the Salem Witch Trials; a retrospective reading reveals the same process at work in the “Mods and Rockers” panic analyzed by Stanley Cohen. Beyond moral panics, theorizing resignification as a non-exclusive counterpoint to framing and ideational embeddedness enriches the theoretical repertoire of cultural sociology. “Deep culture” and mythological signification can, using the schema proposed here, be understood as practical accomplishments—rhetorical responses to particular situations that, when performed successfully, legitimate violence and other forms of domination.

Keywords

Theory of myth Sociology of culture Kenneth Burke Roland Barthes Culture and power Semiotics 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters: on theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. (2010). The performance of politics: Obama’s victory and the democratic struggle for power. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. C., & Mast, J. (2006). Symbolic action in theory and practice: the cultural pragmatics of symbolic action. In C. Alexander Jeffrey, B. Geisen, & J. Mast (Eds.), SocialpPerformance: symbolic action, cultural pragmatics and ritual. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Le Beau, B. F. (1998). The story of the Salem Witch Trials. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boyer, P., & Nissenbaum, S. (1976). Salem possessed: the social origins of witchcraft. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boyer, P., & Nissenbaum, S. (Eds.). (1993). Salem village witchcraft: a documentary record of local conflict in colonial New England. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brooks, P. (1995). The melodramatic imagination: Balzac, Henry James, melodrama, and the mode of excess. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, P., & Gewirtz, P. (Eds.). (1998). Law’s stories: narrative and rhetoric in the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burke, K. (1969). Four master tropes. In A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 503-517.Google Scholar
  13. Burke, K. (1973a). Literature as equipment for living. In The philosophy of literary form: studies in symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 293-304.Google Scholar
  14. Burke, K. (1973b). The philosophy of literary form. In The philosophy of literary form: studies in symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 1-137.Google Scholar
  15. Burr, G. L. (Ed.). (2002). Narratives of the New England witchcraft cases. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, S. (2002). Folk devils and moral panics (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Cornwell, B., & Annula, L. (2002). The myth of “moral panic”: an alternative account of LSD prohibition”. Deviant Behavior, 23, 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Critcher, C. (2009). Widening the focus: moral panics as moral regulation. British Journal of Criminology, 49(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demos, J. (2004). Entertaining Satan: witchcraft and the culture of early New England, updated edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. Translated by Karen Fields. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Eliasoph, N., & Lichterman, P. (2003). Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 735–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erikson, K. (1966). Wayward Puritans: a study in the sociology of deviance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Ermakoff, I. (2010). Theory of practice, raitonal choice, and historical change. Theory and Society, 39(5), 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans, C. (1968). Early American Imprints, 1st Series. Microtext collection. Worcester: American Antiquarian Society.Google Scholar
  25. Garland, D. (2008). On the concept of moral panic. Crime Media Culture, 4(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Godbeer, R. (2005). Escaping Salem: the other witch hunt of 1692. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  28. Goldstone, J. (2003). Comparative historical analysis and knowledge accumulation in the study of revolutions. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 41–90). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (2009). Moral panics: the social construction of deviance. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Gustafson, S. M. Eloquence is power: oratory and performance in early America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hall, J. R. (2009). Apocalypse: from antiquity to the empire of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of ideology: return to the repressed in media studies. In Gurevitch, M., Bennett, T., Curon, J., & Woolacott, J. (eds). Culture, society and the media. New York: Methuen. pp. 56-90.Google Scholar
  33. Hall, D. D. (1990). Worlds of wonder, days of judgment: popular religious belief in early New England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: mugging, the state, and law and order. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Hier, S. P. (2011). Tightening the focus: moral panic, moral regulation and liberal government. British Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hunt, A. (2011). Fractious rivals? Moral panics and moral regulation. In S. Hier (Ed.), Moral panic and the politics of anxiety. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Jasper, J. (1999). The art of moral protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jenkins, P. (1992). Intimate enemies: moral panics in contemporary Britain. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  39. Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Karlsen, C. (1998). The devil in the shape of a woman: witchcraft in colonial New England. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  41. Klein, K. L. (1995). In search of narrative mastery: postmodernism and the people without history. History and Theory, 34(4), 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Konig, D. T. (1979). Law and society in Puritan Massachusetts: Essex County, 1629-1692. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lizardo, O. Beyond the antinomies of structure: Levi-Strauss, Giddens, Bourdieu and Sewell. Theory and Society. 39: 651-688.Google Scholar
  44. Lyotard, J.--F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore, A. (2011). The eventfulness of social reproduction. Sociological Theory, 29(4), 294–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neild, E. (1978). Towards a new contextualism: the complementary theories of Kenneth Burke and Roland Barthes. Ph.D. Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Humanities, Committee on Comparative Studies in Literature. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  48. Norton, M. B. (2003). In the Devil’s Snare: the Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  49. Olick, J. (2007). Figurations of memory: a process-relational methodology, illustrated on the German case. In The politics of regret: on collective memory and historical responsibility. New York: Routledge. Pp. 85-118.Google Scholar
  50. Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Polletta, F. (2008). Culture and movements. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619, 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reed, I. (2007). “Why salem made sense: culture, gender, and the Puritan persecution of witchcraft.” Cultural Sociology, 1(2), 209–234.Google Scholar
  53. Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2005). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Schudson, M. (1989). How culture works. Theory and Society, 18(2), 153–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sewell, W., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sewell, W. Jr. (2005). Refiguring the “social” in social science: an interpretivist manifesto. In Logics of history: social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 318-372.Google Scholar
  57. Silverman, K. (Ed.). (1971). Selected letters of cotton Mather. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Somers, M. R., & Block, F. (2005). From poverty to perversity: ideas, markets, and institutions over 200 years of welfare debate. American Sociological Review, 70(2), 260–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Swedberg, R. (2012). On Charles S. Peirce’s “How to theorize.” (1903).” Sociologica. 2.Google Scholar
  60. Swidler, A. (1995). Cultural power and social movements. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 25–40). University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  61. Thompson, K. (1998). Moral panics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Tilly, C. (2002). Stories, identities, and social change. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  63. Toulouse, T. (1987). The art of prophesying: New England sermons and the shaping of belief. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  64. Waddington, P. A. J. (1986). Mugging as a moral panic: a question of proportion. British Journal of Sociology, 37, 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Warner, M. (1992). Letters of the republic: publication and the public sphere in eighteenth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Weisman, R. (1984). Witchcraft, magic, and religion in 17 th -century Massachusetts. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wright, W. (1977). Sixguns and society: a structural study of the western. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  68. Young, J. (2009). Moral panic: its origins in resistance, ressentiment and the translation of fantasy into reality. British Journal of Criminology, 49(1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zolberg, V. (1990). Constructing a sociology of the arts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations