Abstract
Field analysis, inspired largely from the work of Pierre Bourdieu, is becoming widely used in sociology today. In A Theory of Fields Neil Fligstein and Doug McAdam elaborate selectively on Bourdieu’s thinking to offer a conceptual framework for better understanding the creation, institutionalization, and transformation of “mesolevel social spaces” where actors compete, often through cooperation and coordination, for material and status rewards. In lieu of calling those spaces markets, organizations, networks, systems, or institutions, as is commonly done in the specialized subfields of social movements, political sociology, organizations, and institutional work in political science, FM propose the language of “strategic action field.” They argue that their strategic action field perspective can link agency to structured social spaces and serve as an integrative conceptual umbrella for these fragmented subfields of scholarly specialization. This review presents and evaluates this intellectual field strategy to provide a common and integrative conceptual framework, while calling attention to its key strengths and weaknesses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The American Sociological Association currently has over sixty sections of specialized inquiry with their own panels at annual meetings, web pages, and frequently with publications placed only in selected journals.
References
Benson, R., & Neveu, É. (Eds.). (2005). Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the state: genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1–18.
Bourdieu, P. (1996 [1989]). The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Emirbayer, M., & Johnson, V. (2008). Bourdieu and Organizational Analysis. Theory and Society.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2014). The field of theory. Contemporary Sociology, 43, 315–318.
Fuchs, S. (2014). How not to do (field) theory. Contemporary Sociology, 43, 312–314.
Go, J. (2008). Global fields and imperial forms: field theory and the British and American empires. Sociological Theory, 26(3), 201–229.
Gorski, P. S. (Ed.). (2013). Bourdieu and historical analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kauppi, N., (Ed.). (2012). A Political Sociology of Transnational Europe. ECPR.
Martin, L. J. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49.
Sapiro, G. (2003). The literary field between the state and the market. Poetics, 31(5/6), 441–464.
Steinmetz, G. (2007). The devil’s handwriting: precoloniality and the german colonial state in Quingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Swartz, D. (2013). Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swartz, D.L. Theorizing fields. Theor Soc 43, 675–682 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9237-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9237-0