Skip to main content
Log in

A characterization of trust, and its consequences

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trust is understood in terms of a) acceptance of dependency in b) the absence of information about the other’s reliability in order to c) create an outcome otherwise unavailable. The first of these is the cost of trust; the second, the situation of uncertainty it faces and may overcome; the third, its purchase. This account permits: distinction between trust and similar relations with which it is frequently confused; discovery of the basis of trust in the emotional apprehension of confidence; and demonstration of the relationship between trust and both social capital and rationality, with counter-intuitive results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacharach, M., & Gambetta, D. (2001). Trust in signs. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society, pp. 148–184. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J. M. (2001). Emotion, social theory and social structure: a macrosociological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J. (2004). Consciousness, emotions, and science. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Theory and research on human emotions. advances in group processes: a research annual, volume 21, pp. 245–272. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions: the social organization of gossip. New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: networks, manipulators and coalitions. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott, E. (1971). Family and social network (2nd ed.). New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1990). Trust as a Commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, pp. 49–72. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1990). Trust and Political Agency. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, pp. 73–93. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, clients and friends: interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1988). Reasons within passions: the strategic role of the emotions. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1990). Can we trust Trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, pp. 213–237. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D., & Hamill, H. (2005). Streetwise: how taxi drivers establish their customers’ trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Risk, trust, reflexivity. In U. Beck, A. Giddens & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive Modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, pp. 184–197. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1983). An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica, 51, 7–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics & Society, 21(4), 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1996). Trustworthiness. Ethics., 107(1), 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society, pp. 3–39. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1956). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1993). Frames of deceit: a study of the loss and recovery of public and private trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1996). Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics, 107(1), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, T. D. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1981). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1964). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1963). Two Treatises of Government, edited by Peter Laslett. New York: New American Library.

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, pp. 94–107. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1979). The discourses. Harmonsdsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern societies: the search for the bases of social order. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: from Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35(2), 403–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K. (1992). Best laid schemes: the psychology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993a). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993b). The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, R. (1985). The theory of principal and agent. Part 1. Bulletin of Economic Research, 37(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Rivera, J. (1977). A structural theory of the emotions. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (2001). Trust, honesty and corruption: reflection on the state-building process. European Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 526–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J. (1988). Shame and conformity: the deference-emotion system. American Sociological Review, 53(3), 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1964). The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by Kurt H. Wolff. New York: Free.

  • Simmel, G. (1978). The philosophy of money. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: a sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society, Volume 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1981). The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1993). Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 453–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Barbalet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbalet, J. A characterization of trust, and its consequences. Theor Soc 38, 367–382 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-009-9087-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-009-9087-3

Keywords

Navigation