Skip to main content
Log in

Contest time: time, territory, and representation in the postmodern electoral crisis

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior generations’ electoral crises (e.g., gerrymandering) have dealt mainly with political maneuverings around geographical shifts. We analyze four recent (1998–2003) American electoral crises: the Clinton impeachment controversy, the 2000 Florida presidential election, the Texas legislators’ flight to Oklahoma and New Mexico, and the California gubernatorial recall. We show that in each case temporal manipulation was at least as important as geographical. We highlight emergent electoral practices surrounding the manipulation of time, which we dub “temporal gerrymandering.” We suggest a theory of postmodern electoral crises, in which the rules of time and space are simultaneously in flux. These crises expose concerns with early American democratic theory, which was based on an understanding of “the people” as geographically and temporally unidimensional. Representative systems, therefore, were designed largely without reference to geographic and temporal complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (1999). The messiah and the sovereign: The problem of law in Walter Benjamin. In D. Heller-Roazen (Ed., trans., and introd.), Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy (pp. 160–174). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R. M., Goodrich, M., Hall, T. E., Kiewiet, D. R., & Sled, S. M. (2004). The complexity of the California recall election. PS: Political Science and Politics, XXXVII, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. R. (1991). Imagined communities, 2nd ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, M. (2005). The Framing Wars. The New York Times Magazine.

  • Berinsky, A. J., Burns, N., & Traugott, M. W. (2001). Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual level consequences of voting-by-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 178–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki, R. (1995). The fabrication of Labor: Germany and Britain, 1640–1914. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E. (2004). Postponing the California recall to protect voting rights. PS: Political Science and Politics, XXXVII, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (1999). Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and he recruitment of political activists. American Political Science Review, 93, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNN (2005). Hurricane Katrina Bears Down on Gulf Coast. News broadcast. Retrieved from http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/28/snn.02.html.

  • Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBow, K., & Syer, J. C. (1997). Power and politics in California, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N. (1997). Close to home: The work of avoiding politics. Theory and Society, 26, 605–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1978). On Authority. In R. Tucker (Ed), The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed (pp. 730–733). New York: Norton.

  • Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, B. (2004). Information sovereignty and GIS: The evolution of ‘communities of interest’ in political redistricting. Political Geography 22.

  • Gerston, L. N., & Christensen, T. (2004). Recall! California’s political earthquake. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. R. (2000). Seizing the moment: The problem of conversational agency. Sociological Theory, 18, 368–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. R. (2006). Opportunistic interruptions: Interactional vulnerabilities deriving from linearization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 316–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimpel, J. G., Dyck, J. J., Gaines, B. J., & Shaw, D. R. (2004). Local Political Contexts and the Use of Alternative and Traditional Vote Methods. Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., September, 2004.

  • Guinier, L. (1994). The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. R. (1980). The time of history and the history of times. History and Theory, 19, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R. N. (2000). Race, media, and the crisis of civil society: From Watts to Rodney King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, N. (1961). The phantom tollbooth. New York: Dell Yearling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorowicz, E. H. (1957). The king’s two bodies; a study in mediaeval political theology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, J. A., & Banducci, S. A. (2000). Going postal: How all-mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior, 22, 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousser, T. (2004). Retrospective Voting in California’s Recall. Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., September, 2004.

  • Loveman, M. (2005). The modern state and the primitive accumulation of symbolic power. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1651–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolick, D., Peretz, E., & Schnayerson, M. (2004). The Path to Florida. Vanity Fair p. 310.

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Manifesto of the Communist Party. In R. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed. (pp.469–500). New York: Norton.

  • Milligan, S. (2000). Campaign 2000/Electoral College; Several Tight Races May Make for Strange Election Day Fallout. Boston Globe.

  • Monmonier, M. (2001). Bushmanders & Bullwinkles: How politicians manipulate electronic maps and census data to win elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoveOn (2004). MoveOn.org Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.moveon.org/about.

  • Office of the Independent Counsel (1998). Referral to the United States House of Representatives pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, 595(c). Washington: Office of the Independent Counsel. Avail.: http://icreport.loc.gov/icreport/2toc.htm.

  • O’Malley, M. (1990). Keeping watch: A history of American time. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, A. J. (2006). Citizen speak: The democratic imagination in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A. (2001). Breaking the deadlock: The 2000 election, the constitution, and the courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehnquist, W. H. (2004). Centennial crisis: The disputed election of 1876. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D., Glazer, N., & Denney, R. (1950). The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfatti-Larson, M., & Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2001). The dubious place of virtue: Reflections on the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton and the death of the political event in America. Theory and Society, 30.

  • Schecter, D. L. (2004). Right of Removal: Recall Politics in the Modern Era. Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., September, 2004.

  • Scheppele, K. L. (2001). When the law doesn’t count: The 2000 election and the failure of the rule of law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149, 1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2001). Liberal democracy and the empire of speed. Polity, XXXIV.

  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2004). Liberal democracy and the social acceleration of time. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (1992). Watergate in American memory: How we remember, forget, and reconstruct the past. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (2003). Talking politics: The substance of style from Abe to “W”. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, P. (2004). The creation of the media: Political origins of modern communications. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001). When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. F. (2005). Democracy in time: Popular sovereignty and temporal representation. Constellations, 12, 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Pacifici, R. (1994). Discourse & destruction: The city of Philadelphia vs MOVE. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2000). Theorizing the standoff: Contingency in action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2005). The art of surrender: Decomposing sovereignty at conflict’s end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Pacifici, R. E. (1986). The Moro morality play: Terrorism as social drama. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 77-128). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. W. (2001). Tocqueville between two worlds: The making of a political and theoretical life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (2003). Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Perrin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perrin, A.J., Wagner-Pacifici, R.E., Hirschfeld, L. et al. Contest time: time, territory, and representation in the postmodern electoral crisis. Theor Soc 35, 351–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9006-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9006-9

Keywords

Navigation