Abstract
Popular commentaries suggest that the movement against genetic engineering in agriculture (anti-GE movement) was born in Europe, rooted in European cultural approaches to food, and sparked by recent food-safety scares such as “mad cow” disease. Yet few realize that the anti-GE movement's origins date back thirty years, that opposition to agricultural biotechnology emerged with the technology itself, and that the movement originated in the United States rather than Europe. We argue here that neither the explosion of the GE food issue in the late 1990s nor the concomitant expansion of the movement can be understood without recognizing the importance of the intellectual work carried out by a “critical community” of activists during the two-decade-long period prior to the 1990s. We show how these early critics forged an oppositional ideology and concrete set of grievances upon which a movement could later be built. Our analysis advances social movement theory by establishing the importance of the intellectual work that activists engage in during the “proto-mobilizational” phase of collective action, and by identifying the cognitive and social processes by which activists develop a critical, analytical framework. Our elaboration of four specific dimensions of idea/ideology formation pushes the literature toward a more complete understanding of the role of ideas and idea-makers in social movements, and suggests a process of grievance construction that is more “organic” than strategic (pace the framing literature).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alliance for Better Foods, “Labeling Our Food”, 2001.
Aminzade, Ronald, and Doug McAdam. “Emotions and Contentious Politics.” Mobilization 7 (2002): 107–109.
Barrett, A. “Rocky Ground for Monsanto?” in Business Week, 2000.
Belsie, Laurent. “Superior Crops or ”Frankenfood“? Americans Begin to Reconsider Blase Attitude Toward Genetically Modified Food.” The Christian Science Monitor, 2000.
Bernton, Hal. “Hostile Market Spells Blight For Biotech Potatoes.” Seattle Times. Seattle, 2000.
Boyd, William. “Wonderful Potencies? Deep Structure and the Problem of Monopoly in Agricultural Biotechnology.” in Rachel Schurman and D.D. Takahashi Kelso, (editors)., Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and Its Discontents, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.
Charles, Daniel. Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus Publishing, 2001.
Committee for Responsible Genetics, “GeneWatch: A Newsletter of the Committee for Responsible Genetics.” p. 13. Cambridge, MA, 1983.
Dalton, and Russell. The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.
Doyle, and Jack. Altered harvest: agriculture, genetics, and the fate of the world's food supply (New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking, 1985).
Eyerman, Ron, and Andrew Jamison. Social movements: a cognitive approach (University Park, PA.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991).
Fowler, Cary, Eva Lachkovics, Pat Mooney, and Hope Shand. The Laws of life: Another development and the new biotechnologies (Uppsala, Sweden: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 1988).
Fowler, Cary, and P. R. Mooney. Shattering: food, politics, and the loss of genetic diversity (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1990).
Gamson, William A., Bruce Fireman, and Steven Rytina. Encounters with unjust authority (Homewood, IL.: Dorsey Press, 1982).
Goodwin, Jeff, and James M. Jasper. Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning, and emotion (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).
Goodwin, Jeff, James M. Jasper, and Francesca Polletta. Passionate politics: emotions and social movements (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).
Gould, and Deborah. “Life During Wartime: Emotions and the Development of ACT UP.” Mobilization 7 (2002): 177–200.
Harl, Neil E., Roger G. Ginder, Charles R. Hurburgh, and Steve Moline. “The Starlink Situation,” 2000.
Howard, Ted, and Jeremy Rifkin. Who should play God?: The artificial creation of life and what it means for the future of the human race (New York: Delacorte Press, 1977).
Hubbard, Ruth, and Sheldon Krimsky. “The Origins of CRG.” GeneWatch 16 (2003): 1.
Jasper, James M. The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).
Kilman, Scott. “Monsanto Cuts Profit Oulook Amid Latin American Weakness.” The Wall Street Journal, New York, 2002.
Kloppenburg Jr., Jack Ralph. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Krimsky, Sheldon. Genetic alchemy: The social history of the recombinant DNA controversy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982).
Lappé, Frances Moore, Joseph Collins, and Cary Fowler. Food first: beyond the myth of scarcity (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1977).
McAdam, Doug. Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes – Toward A Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements,” pp. xiv, in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, editors, Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
McAdam, Doug, and David A. Snow. Social Movements: Readings on their Emergence, Mobilization, and Dynamics (Los Angeles: Roxbury, 1997).
Melucci, Alberto. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Oliver, E. Pamela, and Hank Johnston. “What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research.” Mobilization 4 (2000): 37–54.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward. Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail (New York: Pantheon Books, 1977).
Purdue, Derrick A. Anti-genetiX: The emergence of the anti-GM movement. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.
Rochon, Thomas R. Culture moves: Ideas, activism, and changing values (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998).
Schurman, Rachel. “Searching For Achilles' Heel: Social Movements and Activist Efficacy in the Global Food Commodity Chain,“ Paper presented at the conference on Production Networks and Commodity Chains in the Global Economy, Yale University, May 13–14, 2005. Available from the author.
Schurman, Rachel, and William Munro. ”Making Biotech History: Social Opposition to Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future of the Biotechnology Industry.“ in Rachel Schurman and Dennis Takahashi Kelso, (editors), Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and its Discontents (Berkeley: University of California, 2003).
Smith, Christian. Resisting Reagan: The U.S. Central America peace movement (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1996).
Snow, David A, E.B. Rochford, S.K. Worden, and R.D. Benford. ”Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation.“ American Sociological Review 51 (1986): 464–481.
Snow, David, and Robert Benford. ”Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” in Aldon Morris and Carol Mueller (editors), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992).
Tarrow, and G. Sidney. Power in movement: Social movements, collective action, and politics (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Tesh, Sylvia Noble, Uncertain hazards: Environmental activists and scientific proof (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2000).
Tiberghien, Yves, and Sean Starrs. Uncertain hazards: Environmental activists and scientific proof (Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2004).
Wright, Susan. Molecular Politics: Developing American and British Regulatory Policy for Genetic Engineering, 1972–1982 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
Zald and Mayer. “Ideological Structured Action: An Enlarged Agenda for Social Movement Research.” Mobilization 5 (2000): 1–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Rachel Schurman is Associate Professor of Sociology and Global Studies at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests lie in the areas of international political economy of food and agriculture, environmental sociology, and social movements. She is co-editor of Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and Its Discontents (University of California Press, 2003) and several articles and book chapters on the anti-genetic engineering movement. Her current book project, with William Munro, explores how organized social resistance to GMOs has shaped the trajectory of agricultural biotechnology.
William Munro is Associate Professor of Political Science and Director, International Studies Program, at Illinois Wesleyan University. His research and writing focuses on the politics of agrarian change and state formation in Africa, as well as post-conflict development. He is the author of The Moral Economy of the State: Conservation, Community Development and State-Making in Zimbabwe (Ohio University Press,1998). He is currently collaborating with Rachel Schurman on a book about social resistance to agricultural biotechnology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schurman, R., Munro, W. Ideas, thinkers, and social networks: The process of grievance construction in the anti-genetic engineering movement. Theor Soc 35, 1–38 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-6779-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-6779-9