Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The institutional project of neo-liberal globalism: The case of the WTO

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the World Trade Organization (WTO) on domestic trade policies and practices. It shows that protectionist measures, including those practiced by the United States, have been effectively challenged, and consequently restricted, due to the WTO strengthened dispute settlement procedures. I show that the new procedures affected the substantive policy outcomes by changing the political influence of competing actors. Specifically, I identify four transformations affecting the political influence of participants: the re-scaling of political authority, the judicialization of inter-state relations, the institutionalization of the international organization, and the structural internationalization of the state. Based on this case, the article offers a view of globalization as an institutional project. This view emphasizes the political dimension of the process of globalization; it suggests that this project was facilitated by transforming the institutional arrangements in place; and it identifies the contradictions inherent in it both to U.S. hegemony and to the globalization project itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, Vinod. 1985. Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrow, Martin. 1996. The Global Age. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Arrighi, Giovanni. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, David, editor. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael. 2002. “Historical Sociology and Constructivism: An Estranged Past, A Federated Future?” in Historical Sociology of International Relations, edited by Stephen Hobden and John M. Hobson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael N. and Martha Finnemore. 1999. “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53 (4): 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Fred. 1977. “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State.” Socialist Review 6–28.

  • Block, Fred. 1996. The Vampire State and Other Stories. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camillery, Joseph and Jim Falk. 1992. The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of Shrinking and Fragmenting World. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Edgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, Philip G. 1990. The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency, and the Future of the State. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, Philip G. 1997. “Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization.” Government and Opposition 32 (2): 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Ian. 1999. Globalization and International Relations Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, Elisabeth S. 1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology 98:755–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. 1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. 1992. “Global Perestroika.” Socialist Register 26–43.

  • Cupitt, Richard, Rodney Whitlock, and Lynn Whitlock. 1997. “The (Im)mortality of International Governmental Organizations.” pp. 7–23 in The Politics of Global Governance: International Organizations in Interdependent World, edited by Paul F. Diehl. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

  • Curzon, Gerard and Victoria Curzon. 1973. Hidden Barriers to International Trade. London: Trade Policy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daedolus. 1995. “What Future for the State?” 124.

  • Destler, I. M. and and John S. Odell. 1987. Anti-Protection: Changing Forces in United States Trade Politics. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, Peter. 1998. Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy. Third Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Sara. 1999. “Fuji-Kodak, the WTO, and the Death of Domestic Political Constituencies.” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 8: 197.

  • Duina, Francesco and Frank Blithe. 1999. “Nation-States and Common Markets: The Institutional Conditions for Acceptance.” Review of International Political Economy 6 (4): 494–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Stephen M. 1991. “An Interpretation of Max Weber’s Theory of Law: Metaphysics, Economics, and the Iron Cage of Constitutional Law.” Law and Social Inquiry 16(2): 205–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, Jock and Mark Zacher. 1981. “The GATT and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions.” International Organization 35 (4): 561–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lawrence M. 2001. “Erewhon: The Coming Global Legal Order.” Stanford Journal of International Law 37: 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9: 95–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO. June 2000. “World Trade Organization: U.S. Experience to Date in Dispute Settlement System.” Washington D.C.

  • GAO. August 2000. “World Trade Organization: Issues in Dispute Settlement.” Washington D.C.

  • GAO. July 2003. “World Trade Organization: Standard of Review and Impact of Trade Remedy Rulings.” Washington D.C.

  • Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. “Capital Mobility, Trade and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy.” International Organization 49 (4): 657–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen, editor. 1993. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert Keohane, and Anne-Marrie Slaughter. 2000. “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.” International Organization 54 (3): 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, Peter A. 1999. “The Governance Problem in International Relations,” in Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by David A. Lake and Robert Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, Peter. 1999. The Global Gamble: Washington’s Faustian Bid for World Dominance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, Peter. 2003. “U.S.: UN.” New Left Review 24: 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, William. 1997. One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. 1986. Govenring the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44: 936–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt, and Jonathan Perraton. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, Eric. 1994. States and the Reemergence of Global Finance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Paul and Grahame Thompson. 1999. Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Second Edition. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogvelt, Ankie. 1997. Globalization and the Postcolonial World. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudec, Robert E. 1975. The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudec, Robert E. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. New Hampshire: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, Ellen M. 1992. “The Rules of the Game: The Logic of Health Policy-making in France, Swizerland, and Sweden,” in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, and Frank Longstreth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, Ellen M. 1998. “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism.” Politics & Society 26 (1): 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, John H. 1997, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. Second edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, John H. 2000. “The Role and Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism.” Brookings Trade Forum 179.

  • Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist States in their Place. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob. 1997. “Capitalism and Its Future: Remarks on Regulation, Government and Governance.” Review of International Political Economy 4 (3): 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles and David A. Lake, editors. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, Ethan B. 1994. Governing the Global Economy: International Finance and the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert. 1998. “International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work?” Foreign Policy 82–96.

  • Keohane, Robert. 2002. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert and Helen V. Milner, editors. 1996. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D., editor. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1997. “Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?” Review of International Political Economy 4(3): 472–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Lisa. 1993. “International and Domestic Institutions in the EMU Process.” Economics and Politics 5 (2): 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, Fiona. 2000. Democratizing the World Trade Organization. Hoover Institute.

  • McMichael, Philip. 1996. “Globalization: Myths and Realities.” Rural Sociology 61(1): 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, Philip. 2000. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective. Second Edition. California: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittleman, James H. 1996. “The Dynamics of Globalization” in Globalization: Critical Reflections, edited by James H. Mittleman. London: Lynne Rienner.

  • Moravscik, Andrew. 1993. “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Inter-governmentalist Approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 473–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Robin. 1971. “The Internationalization of Capital and the Nation State,” New Left Review 67: 84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, Kenichi. 1990. The Borderless World. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, Kenichi. 1995. The End of the Nation State. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, Henk, editor. 1993. Restructuring Hegemony in the Global Political Economy: The Rise of Transnational Neo-Liberalism in the 1980s. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, Leo. 1994. “Globalization and the State,” in Socialist Register 1994, edited by Ralph Miliband and Leo Panitch. London: The Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutional Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2000. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Chance.” Governance 13 (4): 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul and Stephan Leibfried, editors. 1995. European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preeg, Ernest H. 1995. Traders in a Brave New World: The Uruguay Round and the Future of the International Trading System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Robert. 1992. The Work of Nations. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Martin. 1996. “Globalization and the Restructuring of Regional Economies,” pp. 161–180, in Globalization and Public Policy. pp. 161–180, edited by P. Gummet. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

  • Rodrik, Dani. 2000. “How Far Will International Economic Integration Go?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (1): 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Paul C. and Robert T.C. Vermylen. 2000. “The WTO Antidumping and Subsidies Agreements: Did the United States Achieve its Objectives during the Uruguay Round?” Law and Policy in International Business 31: 871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, George. 1995. Jacques Delors and European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Bo. 1992. “Labor Market Institutions and Working-Class Strength,” in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by in Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Post-War Economic Order.” International Organization 36(4): 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, Johen Gerard. 1994. “At Home Abroad, Abroad at Home: International Liberalization and Domestic Stability in the New World Economy.” Millennium 24 (3): 507–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John G. 1998. Constructing the World Policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, Mark. 2000. Ideologies of Globalization: Contending Visions of a New World Order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Michael. 1995. Playing by the Rules: American Trade Power and Diplomacy in the Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 1998. Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi, Carlo. 1997. “The Political Economy of the Uruguay Round: Groups, Strategies, Interests and Results.” pp. 61–111 in Multilateralism and Regionalism after the Uruguay Round, edited by Riccardo Faini and Enzo Grilli. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Beverly J. and Giovanni Arrighi. 2003. “Polanyi’s ‘Double Movement’: The Belle Epoques of British and U.S. Hegemony Compared.” Politics and Society 31(2): 325–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Martin. 1993. “The Globalization of Law.” Global Legal Studies Journal 1: 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, Leslie. 1991. Sociology of the Global System: Social Change in Global Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. “The Real New World Order.” Foreign Affairs 76(5): 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovsky, John. 1998. “The Making of National Health Insurance in Britain and Canada: Institutional Analysis and its Limits.” Journal of Historical Sociology 11(2): 247–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO.” International Organization 56 (2): 339–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, Sven. 1993. Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen and Sven Steinmo. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics” in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, David M., Yves Dezalay, Ruth Buchanan, and John R. Davis. 1994. “Global Restructuring and the Law: Studies of the Internationalization of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 44: 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of International Organizations. 2002–2003. Yearbook of International Organizations. Brussels: Union of International Organizations.

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, Margaret. 1992. Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda. 1999. “Globalization and National Governance: Antinomy or Interdependence?” Review of International Studies 25: 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda, editor. 2003. States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, John. 1996. “The Myth of the ‘Global’ Economy: Enduring National Foundations and Emerging Regional Realities.” New Political Economy 1(1): 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. July 2001. “Overview of the State-of-Play of WTO Disputes.”

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central European University, Budapest

    Nitsan Chorev

Authors
  1. Nitsan Chorev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chorev, N. The institutional project of neo-liberal globalism: The case of the WTO. Theor Soc 34, 317–355 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-6301-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-6301-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation