Electric Current Transmission Through Tissues of the Vestibular Labyrinth of a Patient: Perfection of the Vestibular Implant
- 5 Downloads
An electric model of current transmission through tissues of the vestibular labyrinth of a patient is suggested. To stimulate directly the vestibular nerve in surgical operation, terminations of the electrodes are implanted through the bone tissue of the labyrinth into the perilymph in the vicinity of the vestibular nerve. The biological tissue of the vestibular labyrinth surrounding the electrodes and having heterogeneous composition possesses conductive and dielectric properties. Thus, when a current pulse from the vestibular implant is applied to one of the electrodes, conductive disturbance currents may arise between the electrodes and the vestibular nerves that can significantly deteriorate the direct signal quality. To study such signals and to compensate for the conductive disturbance currents, an equivalent electric circuit with actual electric impedance properties of tissues of the vestibular system is suggested, and the time parameters of the conductive disturbance current transmission are calculated. It is demonstrated that these parameters can reach large values. The suggested electric model and the results of calculations can be used for perfection of the vestibular implant.
Keywordselectric current impedance of biological tissues electric model vestibular labyrinth vestibular implant
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.A. Lloret-Villas, T. M. Varusai, N. Juty, et al., Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol., 6, 73–86 (2017).Google Scholar
- 5.T. A. K. Nguyen, J. Digiovanna, S. Cavuscens, et al., J. Neural Eng., 13, No. 4, AN046023 (2016).Google Scholar
- 8.V. V. Alexandrov, T. B. Alexandrova, R. Vega, et al., in: Proc. 4th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Mathematical Biology and Ecology MABE’ 08, Acapulco (2008), pp. 86–91.Google Scholar
- 9.V.V. Alexandrov, A. Almanza, N. V. Kulikovskaya, et al., in: Mathematical Modeling of Complex Information Processing Systems, Moscow University Press, Moscow (2001), pp. 26–41.Google Scholar
- 12.A. M. Shkel, J. Liu, C. Ikei, et al., First IEEE Int. Conf. on Sensors 2002, Orlando, Vol. 2 (2002), pp. 1526–1531.Google Scholar
- 14.A. L. Zuev, V. Yu. Mishlanov, A. I. Sudakov, et al., Ross. Zh. Biomekh., 18, No. 4, 491–497 (2012).Google Scholar
- 15.A. L. Zuev, V. Yu. Mishlanov, A. I. Sudakov, et al., Ross. Zh. Biomekh., 14, No. 3 (49), 68–78 (2010).Google Scholar
- 16.P. Wangemann, J. Physiol., 576, Pt. 1, 11–21 (2006).Google Scholar
- 17.W. D. Keidel and W. D. Neff, eds., Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. V (1) (1975).Google Scholar
- 24.A. Puliafito, L. Primo, and A. Celani, J. R. Soc., Interface, 14 (134), 32 (2017).Google Scholar