Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrophilic sulfur-containing antioxidant sodium 3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propylthiosulfate as a modulator of the activity of antitumor cytostatics and their combinations with a NO donor

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Russian Chemical Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

The interaction of a combination of a sulfur-containing phenolic antioxidant sodium 3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propylthiosulfate (TS-13) with a nitric oxide donor (NaNO2) and two antitumor cytostatics, cisplatin and doxorubicin, was studied in vivo using a model of P-388 murine leukemia of BDF1 mice. It has been shown that the type of cytostatics used determines the efficiency of chemotherapy. Depending on this, the antioxidant TS-13 can both enhance and reduce the antitumor effect. The use of TS-13 and a nitric oxide donor with different cytostatics and different modes of drug administration modulates their activity in different ways, namely, from increasing survival to inhibition of survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. P. Jones, H. Sies, Antioxid. Redox Signaling, 2015, 23, 734; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2015.6247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. B. Korman, Misheni i mekhanizmy deistviya protivoopukholevykh preparatov [Targets and Mechanisms of Action of Anticancer Drugs], Practical Medicine, Moscow, 2014, 336 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. S. Kerbel, B. A. Kamen, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2004, 4, 423; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Gnoni, N. Silvestris, A. Licchetta, D. Santini, M. Scartozzi, R. Ria, S. Pisconti, F. Petrelli, A. Vacca, V. Lorusso, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 2015, 95, 46; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Pere, C. Tanchot, J. Bayry, M. Terme, J. Taieb, C. Badoual, O. Adotevi, N. Merillon, E. Marcheteau, V. R. Quillien, C. Banissi, A. Carpentier, F. Sandoval, M. Nizard, F. Quintin-Colonna, G. Kroemer, W. H. Fridman, L. Zitvogel, S. P. Oudard, E. Tartour, Oncoimmunology, 2012, 1, 326; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/onci.18852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Andre, M. Carre, E. Pasquier, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 11, 413; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Prosenko, S. Yu. Klepikova, N. V. Kandalintseva, O. I. Dyubchenko, M. I. Dushkin, N. K. Zenkov, E. B. Menshchikova, Byul. Sib. otdel. Ros. Akad. med. nauk [Bull. Sibirian Branch Russ. Acad. Med. Sci.], 2001, 21, 114 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. K. Zenkov, E. B. Menshchikova, N. V. Kandalintseva, A. S. Oleynik, A. E. Prosenko, O. N. Gusachenko, O. A. Shklyaeva, V. A. Vavilin, V. V. Lyakhovich, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2007, 72, 644; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297907060077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rukovodstvo po provedeniyu doklinicheskikh issledovanii lekarstvennykh sredstv [Guidelines for Conducting Preclinical Studies of Medicinal Products], Part 1, Ed. A. N. Mironova, Grig and K, Moscow, 2012, 944 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Treschalina, O. S. Zhukova, G. K. Gerasimova, N. V. Andronova, A. M. Garin, Rukovodstvo po eksperimentalnomu (doklinicheskomu) izucheniyu novykh farmakologicheskikh veshchestv: metodicheskie ukazaniya po izucheniyu protivoopukholevoi aktivnosti farmakologicheskikh vechestv [Guidelines for the Experimental (Preclinical) Study of New Pharmacological Substances: Guidelines for the Study of the Antitumor Activity of Pharmacological Substances], Meditsina, Moscow, 2005, 637 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eksperimentalnaya otsenka protivoopukholevykh preparatov v SSSR i SShA [Experimental Evaluation of Anticancer Drugs in the USSR and the USA], Eds Z. P. Sofina, A. B. Syrkina, A. Goldin, A. Klein, Meditsina, Moscow, 1980, 293 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. L. Kaplan, P. Meier, J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 1958, 53, 457; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2281868.JSTOR2281868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. S. Chung, S. B. Wang, V. Venkatraman, C. J. Murray, J. E. Van Eyk, Circ. Res., 2013, 112, 382; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Yang, K. S. Carroll, D. C. Liebler, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2016, 15, 1; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O115.056051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. N. Bogatyrenko, Z. V. Kuropteva, L. M. Baider, T. E. Sachenkova, D. V. Michenko, V. R. Bogatyrenko, N. P. Konovalova, Russ. Chem. Bull., 2016, 65, 561; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-016-1337-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. C. Godoy, C. T. M. Anderson, R. Chowdhury, L. J. Trudel, G. N. Wogan, PNAS, 2012, 109, 20373; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218938109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. T. N. Bogatyrenko, Z. V. Kuropteva, L. M. Baider, I. V. Serkov, V. R. Bogatyrenko, T. E. Sachenkova, E. N. Klimanova, D. V. Mishchenko, N. P. Konovalova, Russ. Chem. Bull., 2016, 65, 2509; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-016-1615-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. N. Bogatyrenko, N. P. Konovalova, A. M. Sipyagin, V. R. Bogatyrenko, Z. V. Kuropteva, L. M. Baider, T. E. Sachenkova, B. S. Fedorov, Russ. Chem. Bull., 2014, 63, 1187; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-014-0570-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. G. Martinovich, I. V. Martinovich, A. V. Vcherashniaya, N. K. Zenkov, S. N. Cherenkevich, E. B. Menshchikova, N. V. Kandalintseva, Biophysics Engl. Transl., 2017, 62, 942; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000635091706015X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. T. N. Bogatyrenko, N. V. Kandalintseva, T. E. Sashenkova, D. V. Mishchenko, Russ. Chem. Bull., 2018, 67, 700; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-018-2125-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to T. N. Bogatyrenko or N. V. Kandalintseva.

Additional information

The work was performed in the frameworks of state assignment (No. AAAA-A19_119071890015-6).

All experiments involving animals and their maintenance complied with the rules of laboratory practice set in the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for experiments or for other scientific purposes ETS No. 123 (Strasbourg, 1986), Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 199n of 04/01/2016 “On Approval of the Rules of Good Laboratory Practice” (GLP) in compliance with the International Recommendations of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used in Experimental Research (1997).

The authors declare no competing interests.

Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 3, pp. 517–523, March, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bogatyrenko, T.N., Kandalintseva, N.V., Sashenkova, T.E. et al. Hydrophilic sulfur-containing antioxidant sodium 3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propylthiosulfate as a modulator of the activity of antitumor cytostatics and their combinations with a NO donor. Russ Chem Bull 71, 517–523 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-022-3442-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-022-3442-1

Key words

Navigation