Advertisement

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 135–166 | Cite as

Too risk averse to purchase insurance?

A theoretical glance at the annuity puzzle
  • Antoine BommierEmail author
  • François Le Grand
Article

Abstract

This paper suggests a new explanation for the low level of annuitization, which is valid even if one assumes perfect markets. We show that, as soon there is a positive bequest motive, sufficiently risk averse individuals should not purchase annuities. A model calibration accounting for lifetime risk aversion generates a significantly smaller willingness-to-pay for annuities than the one generated by a standard time-additive model. Moreover, the calibration predicts that riskless savings finance one third of consumption, in line with empirical findings.

Keywords

Annuity puzzle Insurance demand Bequest Intergenerational transfers Risk aversion Multiplicative preferences 

JEL Classifications

D11 D81 D91 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Edmund Cannon, Alexis Direr, Glenn Harrison, Lee Lockwood, Thomas Post, James Poterba, Ray Rees, Harris Schlesinger (the editor), an anonymous referee and seminar participants at ETH Zurich, University of Paris I, University of Zurich, 2011 Summer Meetings of the Econometric Society and CEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012 (LMU, Münich) for their comments.

Supplementary material

11166_2014_9190_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (309 kb)
(PDF 309 KB)

References

  1. Agnew, J. R., Anderson, L. R., Gerlach, J. R., Szykman, L. R. (2008). Who chooses annuities? An experimental investigation of the role of gender, framing, and defaults. American Economic Review, 98(2), 418–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameriks, J., Caplin, A., Laufer, S., Van Nieuwerburgh, S. (2011). The joy of giving or assisted living? Using strategic surveys to separate bequest and precautionary motives. Journal of Finance, 66(2), 519–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, S., Harrison, G., Lau, M., Rutstroem, E. (2011). Multiattribute utility theory, intertemporal utility and correlation aversion. CEAR Working Paper 2011-04, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  4. Benartzi, S., Previtero, A., Thaler, R. H. (2011). Annuitization puzzles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleichrodt, H., & Eeckhoudt, L. (2005). Saving under rank-dependent utility. Economic Theory, 25(2), 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bommier, A (2006). Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting. International Economic Review, 47(4), 1223–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bommier, A. (2007). Risk aversion, intertemporal elasticity of substitution and correlation aversion. Economics Bulletin, 4(29), 1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Bommier, A. (2013). Life cycle preferences revisited. Journal of European Economic Association, 11(6), 1290-1319.Google Scholar
  9. Bommier, A., & LeGrand, F. (2013). Too risk averse to purchase insurance? A theoretical glance at the annuity puzzle. CER-ETH Working Paper 12/157, ETH Zurich. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1991085.
  10. Bommier, A., Chassagnon, A., LeGrand, F. (2012). Comparative risk aversion: a formal approach with applications to saving behaviors. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(4), 1614–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, J.R. (2007). Rational and behavioral perspectives on the role of annuities in retirement planning. NBER Working Paper 13537, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, J. R., Kling, J. R., Mullainathan, S., Wrobel, M. V. (2008). Why don’t people insure late-life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review, 98(2), 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chai, J., Horneff, W., Maurer, R., Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Optimal portfolio choice over the life cycle with flexible work, endogenous retirement, and lifetime payouts. Review of Finance, 15(4), 875–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, P.J., & Graham, D. A. (1977). The demand for insurance and protection: the case of irreplaceable commodities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(1), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidoff, T., Brown, J .R., Diamond, P. A. (2005). Annuities and individual welfare. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1573–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Nardi, M. (2004). Wealth inequality and intergenerational links. Review of Economic Studies, 71(3), 743–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Nardi, M., French, E., Jones, J. B. (2010). Why do the elderly save? The role of medical expenses. Journal of Political Economy, 118(1), 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dorfleitner, G., & Krapp, M. (2007). On multiattributive risk aversion: some clarifying results. Review of Managerial Science, 1(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Drèze, J., & Rustichini, A. (2004). State-dependent utility and decision theory, 2: extensions. Dordrecht In S. Barbera PH, & C. Seild (Eds.), Handbook of utility theory, (pp. 839–892): Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Drèze, J. H., & Modigliani, F. (1972). Consumption decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 5(3), 308–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eden, B (2008). Substitution, risk aversion and asset prices: an expected utility approach. Working Paper 0803, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  22. Epstein, L. G., & Tanny, S. M. (1980). Increasing generalized correlation: a definition and some economic consequences. Canadian Journal of Economics, 13(1), 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (1989). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework. Econometrica, 57(4), 937–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernández-Villaverde, J., & Krueger, D. (2007). Consumption over the life cycle: facts from consumer expenditure survey data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 552–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finkelstein, A., & Poterba, J. (2002). Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuities market. Economic Journal, 112(476), 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finkelstein, A., & Poterba, J. (2004). Adverse selection in insurance markets: policyholder evidence from the U.K. annuity market. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gazzale, R. S., & Walker, L. (2011). I’ll cross that bridge if I get to it: focusing on the near future. Working Paper, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  28. Horneff, W. J., Maurer, R. H., Mitchell, O. S., Stamos, M. Z. (2010). Variable payout annuities and dynamic portfolio choice in retirement. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 9(2), 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu, W. Y., & Scott, J. S. (2007). Behavioral obstacles in the annuity market. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(6), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hurd, M. D., & Smith, J. P. (2002). Expected bequests and their distribution. NBER Working Paper 9142, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  31. Inkmann, J., Lopes, P., Michaelides, A. (2011). How deep is the annuity market participation puzzle. Review of Financial Studies, 24(1), 279–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. James, E., & Song, X. (2001). Annuities markets around the world: money’s worth and risk intermediation. CeRP Working Paper 16/01, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies.Google Scholar
  33. Jappelli, T. (1999). The age-wealth profile and the life-cycle hypothesis: a cohort analysis with time series of cross-sections of italian households. Review of Income and Wealth, 45(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johansson, P. O. (2002). On the definition and age-dependency of the value of a statistical life. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(3), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, R. W., Burman, L. E., Kobes, D. I. (2004). Annuitized wealth at older ages. Evidence from the health and retirement study. Final report to the Employee Benefits Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor, The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Kihlstrom, R. E., & Mirman, L. J. (1974). Risk aversion with many commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 8(3), 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kimball, M. S., & Weil, P. (2009). Precautionary saving and consumption smoothing across time and possibilities. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 41(2–3), 245–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kopczuk, W., & Lupton, J. P. (2007). To leave or not to leave: the distribution of bequest motives. Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), 207–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Livingston, G., & Cohn, D. (2010). The new demography of American motherhood. A Social and Demographic Trends Report, Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  40. Lockwood, L. M. (2012a). Bequest motives and the annuity puzzle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(2), 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lockwood, L. M. (2012b). Bequest motives and the choice to self-insure late-life risks. Working Paper, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  42. Milevsky, M. A., & Young, V. (2007). Annuitization and asset allocation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(9), 3138–3177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell, O. S., Poterba, J. M., Warshawsky, M. J., Brown, J. R. (1999). New evidence on the money’s worth of individual annuities. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1299–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pang, G., & Warshawsky, M. J. (2010). Optimizing the equity-bond-annuity portfolio in retirement: the impact of uncertain health expenses. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46(1), 198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pashchenko, S. (2013). Accounting for non-annuitization. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van der Ploeg, F. (1993). A closed-form solution for a model of precautionary saving. Review of Economic Studies, 60(2), 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ponzetto, G. (2003). Risk aversion and the utility of annuities. CeRP Working Paper 31/03, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies.Google Scholar
  48. Richard, S. F. (1975). Multivariate risk aversion, utility independence and separable utility functions. Management Science, 22(1), 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sinclair, S. M., & Smetters, K. A. (2004). Health shocks and the demand for annuities. Technical Paper 2004-9, Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
  50. Van den Heuvel, S. J. (2008). Temporal risk aversion and asset prices. Working Paper 2008-37, Federal Reserve Board.Google Scholar
  51. Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1), 5–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yaari, M. E. (1965). Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies, 32(2), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yaari, M. E. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55(1), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yogo, M. (2009). Portfolio choice in retirement: health risk and the demand for annuities, housing and risky assets. NBER Working Paper 15307, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.EMLyon Business SchoolÉcullyFrance

Personalised recommendations