Heterogeneity in life-duration preferences: Are risky recreationists really more risk loving?
- 485 Downloads
We conduct multiple price list experiments that elicit life duration risk preferences from amateur auto racers, technical rock climbers, SCUBA divers, and a student control group. We posit a preference function that allows for risk aversion and probability weighting. We are particularly interested in whether the behavior of risk takers, such as risky recreationists or smokers, is best explained by a risk-tolerant utility function or if immunity to possibility bias arising from overweighting of low probabilities is a more important motivator of the choice to engage in risky activities. We find that amateur auto racers are more rational than either students or other risky recreationists because they are less likely to overemphasize low-probability events. Women, older subjects, and rock climbers are more susceptible to possibility bias than others, making them likely to overinvest in disease treatments that have a low probability of success.
KeywordsLife duration preferences CRRA Cumulative prospect theory Medical decision analysis
JEL ClassificationD800 D890 I100
- Allais, M. (1988). The general theory of random choices in relation to the invariant cardinal utility function and the specific probability function. In B. R. Munier (Ed.), Risk, decision and rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. The American Economic Review, 84, 396–418.Google Scholar
- Health and Safety Executive. (2012). http://www.hse.gov.uk/education/statistics.htm. Accessed January 12, 2012.
- Riley Jr., W. B., & Chow, K. V. (1992). Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal, 32–37.Google Scholar
- Savage, L. J. (1972). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1954. Revised and Enlarged Edition, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
- Sports Car Club of America. (2012). http://www.sccaforums.com/forums/forumid/30/postid/6903/scope/posts. Accessed January 12, 2012.
- Stigglebout, A. M., Kiebert, G. M., Kievit, J., Leer, J. W. H., Stoter, G., & de Haes, J. M. (1994). Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores. Medical Decision Making, 14, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sundén, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, Papers & Proceedings, 88, 207–211.Google Scholar