Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 51–80 | Cite as

Deterring domestic violence: Do criminal sanctions reduce repeat offenses?

  • Frank A. Sloan
  • Alyssa C. Platt
  • Lindsey M. Chepke
  • Claire E. Blevins
Article

Abstract

This study presents an empirical analysis of domestic violence case resolution in North Carolina for the years 2004 to 2010. The key hypothesis is that penalties at the level set for domestic violence crimes reduce recidivism (re-arrest on domestic violence charges or conviction in 2 years following an index arrest). We use state court data for all domestic violence-related arrests. Decisions to commit an act of domestic violence are based on a Bayesian process of updating subjective beliefs. Individuals have prior beliefs about penalties for domestic violence based on actual practice in their areas. An individual’s experience with an index arrest leads to belief updating. To address endogeneity of case outcomes, we use an instrumental variables strategy based on decisions of prosecutors and judges assigned to each index arrest in our sample. Contrary to our hypothesis, we find that penalities, at least as set at the current levels, do not deter future arrests and convictions.

Keywords

Crime Domestic violence Deterrence Subjective beliefs Prosecutors Judges 

JEL Classification

K14 K36 K42 

References

  1. Ahlin, E. M., Zador, P. L., Rauch, W. J., Howard, J. M., & Duncan, G. D. (2011). First-time DWI offenders are at risk of recidivating regardless of sanctions imposed. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 137–142. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anwar, S., & Loughran, T. A. (2011). Testing a Bayesian learning theory of deterrence among serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 49(3), 667–698. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00233.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apel, R. (2012). Sanctions, perceptions, and crime: Implications for criminal deterrence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9170-1.
  4. Baldry, A. C. (2003). Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(7), 713–732. doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(03)00114-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, M. C., & Breiding, M. J. (2008). Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence-United States, 2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(5), 113–115.Google Scholar
  6. Casanueva, C., Martin, S. L., & Runyan, D. K. (2009). Repeated reports for child maltreatment among intimate partner violence victims: Findings from the national survey of child and adolescent well-being. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(2), 84–93. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control. (2003). In Dept of Health and Human Services (Ed.), Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, J. J., Theodore, A. D., Martin, S. L., & Runyan, D. K. (2008). Psychological abuse between parents: Associations with child maltreatment from a population-based sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(8), 819–829. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles, K., & Durlauf, S. (2012). Pitfalls in the use of time series methods to study deterrence and capital punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9169-7. 1–22.
  10. DeRiviere, L. (2008). Do economists need to rethink their approaches to modeling intimate partner violence? Journal of Economic Issues, 42(3), 583–606.Google Scholar
  11. Doyle, J. J. (2007). Child protection and child outcomes: Measuring the effects of foster care. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1583–1610. doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle, J. J. (2008). Child protection and adult crime: Using investigator assignment to estimate causal effects of foster care. Journal of Political Economy, 116(4), 746–770. doi:10.1086/590216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dube, S. R., Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Edwards, V. J., & Williamson, D. F. (2002). Exposure to abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction among adults who witnessed intimate partner violence as children: Implications for health and social services. Violence and Victims, 17(1), 3–17. doi:10.1891/vivi.17.1.3.33635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrlich, I. (1981). On the usefulness of controlling individuals: An economic analysis of rehabilitation, incapacitation, and deterrence. American Economic Review, 71(3), 307–322.Google Scholar
  15. Eitle, D. (2005). The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organizational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Crime & Delinquency, 51(4), 573–597. doi:10.1177/0011128705277784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fagan, J. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. In NIJ (Ed.), NIJ Research Report.Google Scholar
  17. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Felson, R. B., Messner, S. F., Hoskin, A. W., & Deane, G. (2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40(3), 617–648. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00968.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilles, S. G. (2006). The judgment-proof society. Washington and Lee Law Review, 63(2), 603–718.Google Scholar
  20. Grann, M., & Wedin, I. (2002). Risk factors for recidivism among spousal assault and spousal homicide offenders. Psychology Crime & Law, 8(1), 5–23. doi:10.1080/10683160290000860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green, D. P., & Winik, D. (2010). Using random judge assignments to estimate the effects of incarceration and probation on recidivism among drug offenders. Criminology, 48(2), 357–387. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00189.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gross, M., Cramer, E., Forte, J., Gordon, J., Kunkel, T., & Moriarty, L. (2000). The impact of sentencing options on recidivism among domestic violence offenders: A case study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(2), 301–312. doi:10.1007/bf02887600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanson, R. K., & Wallace-Carpretta, S. (2004). Predictors of criminal recidivism among male batterers. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(4), 413–427. doi:10.1080/10683160310001629283.
  24. Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2005). Criminal prosecution of domestic violence offenses: An investigation of factors predictive of court outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(6), 612–642. doi:10.1177/0093854805279945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2007). The effect of arrest on wife assault recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(10), 1334–1344. doi:10.1177/0093854807300757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavina, A., & Don, F. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98(1), 255–298.Google Scholar
  27. Hjalmarsson, R. (2009). Juvenile jails: A path to the straight and narrow or to hardened criminality? Journal of Law and Economics, 52(4), 778–808. doi:10.1086/596039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hurt, H., Malmud, E., Brodsky, N. L., & Giannetta, J. (2001). Exposure to violence: Psychological and academic correlates in child witnesses. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(12), 1351–1356. doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.12.1351.Google Scholar
  29. Iyengar, R. (2009). Does the certainty of arrest reduce domestic violence? Evidence from mandatory and recommended arrest laws. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1–2), 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, J., & Starsoneck, L. (2007). NC District courts’ response to domestic violence: Report regarding best practices and judicial training. Raleigh.Google Scholar
  31. Kingsnorth, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 12(10), 917–935. doi:10.1177/1077801206293081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klein, A. R. (2004). The criminal justice response to domestic violence. Mason: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, L. C., Kotch, J. B., & Cox, C. E. (2004). Child maltreatment in families experiencing domestic violence. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 573–592. doi:10.1891/vivi.19.5.573.63682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levitt, S. D., & Miles, T. J. (2007). Empirical study of criminal punishment. In A. M. Polinsky, & S. Shavell (Eds.), Handbook of law and economics (Vol. 1, pp. 455–495). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  35. Lochner, L. (2007). Individual perceptions of the criminal justice system. American Economic Review, 97(1), 444–460. doi:10.1257/aer.97.1.444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Loughran, T. A., Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., Fagan, J., Piquero, A. R., & Losoya, S. H. (2009). Estimating a dose-response relationship between length of stay and future recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 47(3), 699–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71(1), 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual-differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27(3), 467–496. doi:10.2307/3054102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Committee. (2009). Structured sentencing: Training and reference manual. In N. C. Courts (Ed.).Google Scholar
  40. North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts. (2011). North Carolina Courts Annual Report: July 2, 2010–June 30, 2011. In N. C. J. Department (Ed.), (pp. 20). North Carolina.Google Scholar
  41. North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services. (2011). North Carolina’s Criminal Justice System: A comparison of prosecution and indigent defense resources. (pp. 10). Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  42. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. The American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. doi:10.1086/374403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 765–823.Google Scholar
  44. Pogarsky, G., & Piquero, A. R. (2003). Can punishment encourage offending? Investigating the “resetting” effect. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(1), 95–120. doi:10.1177/0022427802239255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pogarsky, G., Piquero, A. R., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Modeling change in perceptions about sanction threats: The neglected linkage in deterrence theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(4), 343–369. doi:10.1007/s10940-004-5868-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pogarsky, G., Kim, K., & Paternoster, R. (2005). Perceptual change in the National Youth Survey: Lessons for deterrence theory and offender decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/0741882042000333627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Polinsky, A. M., & Shavell, S. (1999). On the disutility and discounting of imprisonment and the theory of deterrence. The Journal of Legal Studies, 28(1), 1–16. doi:10.1086/468044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Polinsky, A. M., & Shavell, S. (2007). The theory of public enforcement of law. In A. M. Polinsky, & S. Shavell (Eds.), Handbook of law and economics (Vol. 1, pp. 403–454). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  49. Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Bureau of Justice Statistics: Special Report, NCJ 178247.Google Scholar
  50. Robbins, K. (1999). No-drop prosecution of domestic violence: Just good policy, or equal protection mandate? Stanford Law Review, 52(1), 205–233. doi:10.2307/1229461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robinson, A. L. (2000). The effect of a domestic violence policy change on police officers’ schemata. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(5), 600–624. doi:10.1177/0093854800027005004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmidt, J., & Steury, E. H. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27(3), 487–510. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simon, L. M. J., Ellwanger, S. J., & Haggerty, J. (2010). Reversing the historical tide of iatrogenic harm: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of increases in arrests of domestic batterers and rapists. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5–6), 306–320. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simpson, S. S., Bouffard, L. A., Garner, J., & Hickman, L. (2006). The influence of legal reform on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 297–316. doi:10.1080/07418820600869087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sloan, F. A., & Hsieh, C. R. (1990). Variability in medical malpractice payments: Is the compensation fair? Law & Society Review, 24(4), 997–1039. doi:10.2307/3053617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, K., Barrett, C. B., & Box, P. W. (2001). Not necessarily in the same boat: Heterogeneous risk assessment among East African pastoralists. Journal of Development Studies, 37(5), 1–30. doi:10.1080/713601068.Google Scholar
  57. Stafford, M. C., & Warr, M. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(2), 123–135. doi:10.1177/0022427893030002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557–586. doi:10.2307/2171753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thistlethwaite, A., Wooldredge, J., & Gibbs, D. (1998). Severity of dispositions and domestic violence recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 44(3), 388–398. doi:10.1177/0011128798044003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence. In CDC/NIJ (Ed.), Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey.Google Scholar
  61. Tolman, R. M., & Weisz, A. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence - the effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 481–495. doi:10.1177/0011128795041004007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. United States Census Bureau. (2011). Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for all Ages and for 18 Years and Over, for North Carolina: 2000 and 2010. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  63. United States Census Bureau. (2010). The United States Census 2010. http://2010.census.gov/2010census/. Accessed July 31, 2012.
  64. Ventura, L. A., & Davis, G. (2005). Domestic violence - court case conviction and recidivism. Violence Against Women, 11(2), 255–277. doi:10.1177/1077801204271722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Viscusi, W. K., & Evans, W. N. (2006). Behavioral probabilities. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32(1), 5–15. doi:10.1007/s10797-006-6663-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Viscusi, W. K., & O’Connor, C. J. (1984). Adaptive responses to chemical labeling: Are workers Bayesian decision makers? American Economic Review, 74(5), 942–956.Google Scholar
  67. Western, B., Kling, J. R., & Weiman, D. F. (2001). The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 410–427. doi:10.1177/0011128701047003007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Williams, K. R., & Houghton, A. B. (2004). Assessing the risk of domestic violence reoffending: A validation study. Law and Human Behavior, 28(4), 437–455. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039334.59297.f0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wooldredge, J., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2002). Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: Conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stake in conformity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(1), 45–70. doi:10.1023/A:1013292812895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yates, D., Pillai, V., & Berry, P. (2008). Mediation verses arrest approaches to domestic assault: Policy implications for addressing domestic abuse among under-educated and jobless offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 282–296. doi:10.1007/s12103-008-9038-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank A. Sloan
    • 1
  • Alyssa C. Platt
    • 3
  • Lindsey M. Chepke
    • 1
  • Claire E. Blevins
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Clinical Psychology DepartmentVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.Duke Global Health & Department of Biostatics and BioinformaticsDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations