Skip to main content
Log in

An Experimental Comparison of Induced and Elicited Beliefs

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Understanding choice under risk requires knowledge of beliefs and preferences. A variety of methods have been proposed to elicit peoples’ beliefs. The efficacy of alternative methods, however, has not been rigorously documented. Herein we use an experiment to test whether an induced probability can be recovered using an elicitation mechanism based on peoples’ predictions about a random event. We are unable to recover the induced belief. Instead, the estimated belief is systematically biased in a way that is consistent with anecdotal evidence in the economics, psychology, and statistics literature: people seem to overestimate low and underestimate high probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitkin, M. (1991). “Posterior Bayes Factors,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 53, 111–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1973). “Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle.” In N. Petrov and F. Csadki (eds.), Proceedings of the 2{nd} International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.

  • Beach, L. R. and L. D. Philips. (1967). “Subjective Probabilities Inferred from Estimator Bets,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 75, 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croson, Rachel T. A. (2000). “Thinking Like a Game Theorist: Factors Affecting the Frequency of Equilibrium Play,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 41, 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufwenberg, M. and U. Gneezy. (2000). “Measuring Beliefs in an Experimental Lost Wallet Game,” Games and Economic Behavior 30, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. (1968). “Conservatism in Human Information Processing.” In B. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgement. New York: Wiley, pp. 17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Gamal, M. A. and D. M. Grether. (1995). “Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral Strategies,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 1137–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D. M. (1980). “Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representative Heuristic,” Quarterly Journal of Economics November, 537–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D. M. (1992). “Testing Bayes Rule and the Representative Heuristic: Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17, 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, D. W. and C. F. Camerer. (1994). “The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories,” Econometrica 62, 1251–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray, J.-Y. and E. Karni. (1999). “Elicitation of Subjective Probabilities when the Initial Endowment is Unobservable,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jianakoplos, N. A. and A. Bernasek. (1998). “Are Women More Risk Averse?” Economic Inquiry 36, 620– 630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, E. and Z. Safra. (1995). “The Impossibility of Experimental Elicitation of Subjective Probabilities,” Theory and Decision38, 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (1987). “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 124–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D. and T. Page. (1990). “Public and Private Information: An Experimental Study of Information Pooling,” Econometrica 58, 1321–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. E. and R. A. Kramer. (1990). “The Elicitation of Subjective Probabilities with Applications in Agricultural Economics,” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 58, 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyarko, Y. and A. Schotter. (2002). “An Experimental Study of Belief Learning Using Elicited Beliefs,” Econometrica 70, 971–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerman, T., J. Sonnemans, and A. Schram. (1996). “Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods,” Economic Journal 106, 817–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. and D. Ansic. (1997). “Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour in Financial Decision Making: An Experimental Analysis,” Journal of Economic Psychology 18, 605–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1971). “Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectation Formation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 783–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, R. E. and K. Borcherding. (1973). “The Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions: A Training Experiment,” Acta Psychologica 37, 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, R., M. Brown, M. Gysler, and H. W. Brachinger. (1999). “Financial Decision-Making: Are Women Really More Risk-Averse?” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89, 381–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. (1978). “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, D. O. and P. W. Wilson. (1995). “On Players’ Models of Other Players: Theory and Experimental Evidence,” Games and Economic Behavior 10, 218–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundén, A. E. and B. J. Surette. (1998). “Gender Differences in the Allocation of Assets in Retirement Savings Plans,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 88, 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, D. M., A. F. M. Smith, and U. E. Makov. (1985). Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1992). Fatal Tradeoffs. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R. L. (1967). “The Assessment of Prior Distributions in Bayesian Analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 776–800.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terrance M. Hurley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurley, T.M., Shogren, J.F. An Experimental Comparison of Induced and Elicited Beliefs. J Risk Uncertainty 30, 169–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-6565-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-6565-5

Keywords

Navigation