Skip to main content
Log in

Relative Risk Aversion: What Do We Know?

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative risk aversion measure that represents the risk preferences of a decision maker depends on the outcome variable that is used as the argument of the utility function, and on the way that outcome variable is defined or measured. In addition, the relationship between any two such relative risk aversion measures is determined by the relationship between the corresponding outcome variables. These well-known facts are used to adjust several reported estimates of relative risk aversion so that those estimates can be directly compared with one another. After adjustment, the significant variation in the reported relative risk aversion measures for representative decision makers is substantially reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Helsinki: Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö.

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. (1971). Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. New York: Markham Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, Robert B., F. Thomas Juster, Miles. S. Kimball, and Matthew D. Shapiro. (1997). “Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2), 537–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, David. (1996). “Efficiency, Risk Aversion and Portfolio Insurance: An Analysis of Financial Asset Portfolios Held by Investors in the United Kingdom,” Economic Journal 106(438), 1175–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, D. and J. E. Stiglitz. (1972). “Risk Aversion and Wealth Effects on Portfolios with Many Assets,” The Review of Economic Studies 39(3), 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Hsueh-Cheng, Michael J. P. Magill, and Wayne J. Shafer. (1987). “Some Results on Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty,” International Economic Review 28 (2), 493–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, George. M.. (1990). “Habit Formation: A Resolution of the Equity Premium Puzzle,” Journal of Political Economy 98 (3), 519–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbush, Rudiger and Stanley Fischer. (1987). Macroeconomics, 4th edition, New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin and Elena Ranguelova. (2001). “Individual Risk in an Investment-Based Social Security System,” American Economic Review 91 (4), 1116–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, Irwin and Marshall E. Blume. (1975). “The Demand for Risky Assets,” American Economic Review 65 (5), 900–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, Christian. (2002). “Time Diversification, Liquidity Constraints, and Decreasing Aversion to Risk on Wealth,” Journal of Monetary Economics 49 (7), 1439–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, Josef and Tae Kun Seo. (1993). “Sensible Risk Aversion,” Working Paper, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.

  • Halek, Martin and Joseph G. Eisenhauer. (2001). “Demography of Risk Aversion,” The Journal of Risk and Insurance 68 (1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, Jack and John G. Riley. (1992). The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, Miles. S. and N. Gregory Mankiw. (1989). “Precautionary Saving and the Timing of Taxes,” Journal of Political Economy 97 (4), 863–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, N. R. (1996). “The Equity Premium: Its Still a Puzzle,” Journal of Economic Literature 34, 42–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon E. (1946). National Income: A Summary of Findings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research .

  • Mehra, Rajnish and Edward C. Prescott. (1985). “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle,” Journal of Monetary Economics 15 (2), 145–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes, C.F. and D.L. Hanson. (1970). “On the Theory of Risk Aversion,” International Economic Review 11 (3), 481–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer Donald. J. and Jack Meyer. (2004). “Risk Preferences in Multi-Period Consumption Models, The Equity Premium Puzzle, and Habit Formation Utility,” Working Paper, Department of Economics, Michigan State University. (Forthcoming in the Journal of Monetary Economics).

  • Ogaki, Masao and Qiang Zhang. (2001). “Decreasing Relative Risk Aversion and Tests of Risk Sharing,” Econometrica 69 (2), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, John W. (1964). “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large,” Econometrica 32 (12), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Michael and Joseph E. Stiglitz. (1971). “Increasing Risk II: Its Consequences,” Journal of Economic Theory 3 (1), 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, Atanu and C. Richard Shumway. (1994). “Joint Estimation of Risk Preference Structure and Technology Using Expo–Power Utility,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (2), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, Agnar. (1971). “On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty,” American Economic Review 61 (1), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser, Richard and Emmett Keeler. (1970). “Another Type of Risk Aversion,” Econometrica 38 (5), 661–665.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Meyer.

Additional information

JEL Classification: D81

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, D.J., Meyer, J. Relative Risk Aversion: What Do We Know?. J Risk Uncertainty 31, 243–262 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-5102-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-5102-x

Keywords

Navigation