Skip to main content
Log in

How Many Balance Functions Does it Take to Determine a Utility Function?

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Call b your balance function at wealth W if you are indifferent between W and a 50–50 lottery with outcomes x and b(x). Given one b, u is arbitrary on one side of W but then determined on the other. Given two b‘s, u is arbitrary between the two Ws but then determined elsewhere. Additional properties of u restrict the b’s but do not ordinarily make u unique. Contradictions can occur. Given three bs, an algorithm is developed using minimal domains of definition that determines the relative utility of the W’s. If it is irrational, then the set S generated by applying all combinations of b’s to Ws is dense and u is determined. If finitely many b’s are rationally related, then S is discrete, a further algorithm determines it, the values of u on S are equally spaced, and u is arbitrary between any two adjacent points of S but then determined elsewhere. Infinitely many balance functions determine u unless they are rationally related in a uniform way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gollier, Christian and John W. Pratt. (1996). “Risk Vulnerability and the Tempering Effect of Background Risk,” Econometrica 64, 1109–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Richard F. and John W. Pratt. (1968). “The Consistent Assessment and Fairing of Preference Functions,” IEEE Transactions on System Science and Cybernetics (SSC-43), 270–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, John W. (1961). “Remarks on the Relationship Between Utility and the Certainty Equivalent of a 50 School.

  • Pratt, John W. (1992). “Risk Aversion.” In John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, Howard. (1968). Decision Analysis, Addison-Wesley.

  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1992). “Risk Tolerances, Distributive Inequality, and Track Bettors′ Equilbrium.” In P. Dasgupta, D. Gale, O. Hart, and E. Maskin (eds.), Economic Analysis of Markets and Games: Essays in Honor of Frank Hahn. MIT Press.

  • Schlaifer, Robert. (1969). Analysis of Decisions Under Uncertainty, McGraw-Hill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Pratt.

Additional information

JEL Classification: D81

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pratt, J.W. How Many Balance Functions Does it Take to Determine a Utility Function?. J Risk Uncertainty 31, 109–127 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-3551-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-3551-x

Keywords

Navigation