This study is framed by Bandura’s social cognitive theory and Dewey’s idea of habits and investigates types of science teachers based on four constructs: (a) self-efficacy beliefs, (b) twenty-first-century learning attitudes, (c) the frequency of implementing inquiry-based instruction, and (d) the frequency of using technology in teaching. K-means clustering analysis was run on a sample of 837 US elementary and secondary science teachers. Multinomial logistic regression was then used to characterize each group using variables such as years of teaching experience, National Board Certification (NBC) status, gender, grade-level taught, school location, STEM career awareness, and leadership attitudes. We found four science teacher groups and named them the idealist, moderate, reform-minded, and generalist. Further analyses revealed that gender and geographic location did not significantly influence cluster membership. However, we found that clustering was significantly associated with NBC status, grade-level taught, years of teaching experience, STEM career awareness, and leadership attitudes. Notably, the reform-minded science teachers were more likely to hold an NBC status, teach secondary science, and have a high awareness of current STEM careers. Moreover, the generalist science teachers were those teaching elementary levels and without NBC status. These findings inform the design of tailored professional development programs targeting specific science-teacher characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anderson, D., & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher. Teachers and Teaching, 18(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.629838
Avraamidou, L. (2014). Developing a reform-minded science teaching identity: The role of informal science environments. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9395-y
Bae, C. L., Hayes, K. N., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2020). Profiles of middle school science teachers: Accounting for cognitive and motivational characteristics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 911–942. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21617
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
Bryce, N., Wilmes, S. E., & Bellino, M. (2016). Inquiry identity and science teacher professional development. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9725-1
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., Niknafs, A., & Charrad, M. M. (2014). Package ‘nbclust.’ Journal of Statistical Software, 61(6), 1–36.
Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606077620
Coskie, T. L., & Place, N. A. (2008). The National Board Certification process as professional development: The potential for changed literacy practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1893–1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.005
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Habits of mind. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
d’Alessio, M. A. (2018). The effect of microteaching on science teaching self-efficacy beliefs in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1456883
Dam, M., Janssen, F. J. J. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2018). Attention to intentions—how to stimulate strong intentions to change. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9572-4
Danielowich, R. M. (2012). Looking through different lenses: How preservice science teachers use practice-oriented reflections to negotiate more reform-minded identities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(4), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9273-4
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Dewey, J. (1922/1983). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, volume 14. Southern Illinois University Press.
Displayr. (2017). The relationship between cluster analysis, latent class analysis and self-organizing maps. Retrieved from https://docs.displayr.com/wiki/The_Relationship_Between_Cluster_Analysis,_Latent_Class_Analysis_and_Self-Organizing_Maps
Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands-on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). AK-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (applied Statistics), 28(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830
Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286
Jong, C., & Hodges, T. E. (2013). The influence of elementary preservice teachers’ mathematical experiences on their attitudes towards teaching and learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2–3), 100–122.
Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1535–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9398-0
Kahveci, A., Kahveci, M., Mansour, N., & Alarfaj, M. M. (2018). Exploring science teachers’ affective states: Pedagogical discontentment, self-efficacy, intentions to reform, and their relationships. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1359–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9606-y
Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). Chapter 32: 21st century skills. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory (pp. 479–496). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Lampert, M., Boerst, T., & Graziani, F. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1361–1400.
Langbeheim, E., Perl, D., & Yerushalmi, E. (2020). Science teachers’ attitudes towards computational modeling in the context of an inquiry-based learning module. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09855-3
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., Ryder, J., & Östman, L. (2020). The transformation of teaching habits in relation to the introduction of grading and national testing in science education in Sweden. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9684-5
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press.
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.
Luft, J. A., Wong, S. S., & Semken, S. (2011). Rethinking recruitment: The comprehensive and strategic recruitment of secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(5), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9243-2
Maeng, J. L., Whitworth, B. A., Bell, R. L., & Sterling, D. R. (2020). The effect of professional development on elementary science teachers’ understanding, confidence, and classroom implementation of reform-based science instruction. Science Education, 104(2), 326–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21562
Mangiante, E. S. (2018). Planning for reform-based science: Case studies of two urban elementary teachers. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9566-2
National Education Association. (2012b). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator's guide to "the four Cs." Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files3/0d3e72e9b873e0ef2ed780bf53a347b4.pdf
National Research Council. (2012a). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nelsen, P. J. (2015). Intelligent dispositions: Dewey, habits and inquiry in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114535267
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
Park, S., Kite, V., Suh, J. K., Jung, J., & Rachmatullah, A. (2022). Investigation of the relationships among science teachers’ epistemic orientations, epistemic understanding, and implementation of next generation science standards science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(4), 561–584.
Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605
Roehrig, G. H., & Kruse, R. A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a Reform-Based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 105(8), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18061.x
Rupp, D., & Becker, E. S. (2021). Situational fluctuations in student teachers’ self-efficacy and its relation to perceived teaching experiences and cooperating teachers’ discourse elements during the teaching practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103252
SBE, State Board of Education & NC Department of Public Instruction (2009). North Carolina Public Schools Statistical Profile: 2008–2009. Raleigh, NC: Authors. Retrieved from https://digital.ncdcr.gov/digital/collection/p249901coll22/id/92200/rec/2
Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Preston, C., Kisa, Z., Oz, E., & Morgan, J. (2021). Assessing instructional quality in science in the era of ambitious reforms: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21651
Thomson, M. M., DiFrancesca, D., Carrier, S., & Lee, C. (2017). Teaching efficacy: Exploring relationships between mathematics and science self-efficacy beliefs, PCK and domain knowledge among preservice teachers from the United States. Teacher Development, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1204355
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245.
Unfried, A., Rachmatullah, A., Alexander, A., & Wiebe, E. (2022). An alternative to STEBI-A: validation of the T-STEM science scale. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–14.
Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20032
Wang, H., & Hall, N. C. (2018). A systematic review of teachers’ causal attributions: Prevalence, correlates, and consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02305
Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 408–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.002
Wyatt, M. (2014). Towards a re-conceptualization of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Tackling enduring problems with the quantitative research and moving on. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(2), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.742050
Zangori, L., Foulk, J., Sadler, T. D., & Peel, A. (2018). Exploring elementary teachers’ perceptions and characterizations of model-oriented issue-based teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(7), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1482173
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
We would like to thank Malinda Faber and Alana Unfried for their work on the development of the original data set and survey instruments.
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation through the grant DUE-1038154. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Portions of the work were also supported by the Golden LEAF Foundation.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rachmatullah, A., Hinckle, M. & Wiebe, E.N. The Role of Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs and Habits in Differentiating Types of K–12 Science Teachers. Res Sci Educ 53, 337–355 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10060-y