This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Banilower, E., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2006). The status of k-12 science teaching in the United States: Results from a national observation survey. In D. W. Sunal & E. L. Wright (Eds.), The impact of the state and national standards on k-12 science teaching (pp. 83–122). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co..
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94.
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216.
Cannady, M. A., Vincent-Ruz, P., Chung, J. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Scientific sensemaking supports science content learning across disciplines and instructional contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802.
Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in 3 part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291.
Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice, 409–434.
Elgin, C. Z. (2013). Epistemic agency. Theory and Research in Education, 11(2), 135–152.
Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451–498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2.
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.
Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structures in lessons. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153–181). New York: Academic Press.
Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ford, M. J., & Wargo, B. M. (2007). Routines, roles, and responsibilities for aligning scientific and classroom practices. Science Education, 91(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20171.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hayes, K. N., Lee, C. S., DiStefano, R., O’Connor, D., & Seitz, J. C. (2016). Measuring science instructional practice: A survey tool for the age of ngss. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27, 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9448-5.
Horizon Research. (2000). Inside the classroom: Observation and analytic protocol. NC: Retrieved from Chapel Hill.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Kang, H., Windschitl, M., Stroupe, D., & Thompson, J. (2016). Designing, launching, and implementing high quality learning opportunities for students that advance scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1316–1340.
Kawasaki, J., & Sandoval, W. A. (2019). The role of teacher framing in producing coherent NGSS-aligned teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1657765.
Kelly, G. J. (2014). Discourse practices in science learning and teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 321–336). New York: Routledge.
Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185–1217.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 635–679.
Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 512–529.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Manz, E. (2016). Examining evidence construction as the transformation of the material world into community knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1113–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21264.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nava, I., Park, J., Dockterman, D., Kawasaki, J., Schweig, J., Hunter Quartz, K., & Martinez, J. F. (2019). Measuring teaching quality of secondary mathematics and science residents: A classroom observation framework. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118755699.
NRC. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
O'Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017). The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 48, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.003.
O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., & Chapin, S. (2015). “Scaling down” to explore the role of talk in learning: From district intervention to controlled classroom study. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 111–126). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Assn.
Piburn, M., & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (rtop): Reference manual, ACEPT technical report no IN00–3. AZ: Retrieved from Tempe.
Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D., & Phelan, J. (2006). Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 261–292.
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children’s epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526.
Sandoval, W. A., Kwako, A. J., Modrek, A., & Kawasaki, J. (2018). Patterns of classroom talk through participation in discourse-focused teacher professional development. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count. 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018 (Vol. 2, pp. 760–767). London: ISLS.
Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Redman, E. H., & Xiao, S. (2019). Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 1848–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641856.
Schultz, S. E., & Pecheone, R. L. (2015). Assessing quality teaching in science. In T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, & R. C. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project (pp. 444–483). John Wiley & Sons.
Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516.
Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1996). “This question is just too, too easy!” Students’ perspectives on accountability in science. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 97–125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2018). Ambitious science teaching. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.
This work is supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (award #1503511). The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors only, and do not represent the official views and opinions of the NSF.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sandoval, W.A., Kawasaki, J. & Clark, H.F. Characterizing Science Classroom Discourse Across Scales. Res Sci Educ 51, 35–49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09953-7