Abstract
Science education is essential for sustainability and prosperity. However, students from rural communities, arguably the future custodians of our environment and significant drivers of our economies, underperform in science education. In Australia, rural students generally lag behind metropolitan students in science achievement and engagement. However, this is not the case for all rural schools. This paper reports on one case study of a rural school performing much better than expected in senior science subjects. Counter to trends of lower expectations, limited resourcing and restricted pathways afflicting rural science education, this school maintained high expectations backed by proactive support, used local resources to offer rich science learning and creatively maintained a broad array of science learning pathways. Further, the school actively raised the profile of science, and built the capacity of their science teaching team. This case study demonstrates that rural schools, by capitalising on their local resources, relatively small size and strong community relationships, can succeed in science education. This case, along with similar cases, has implications for school leaders, teachers and policy makers seeking to improve rural science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Notes
The VCE is typically earned by Victorian students across the final 2 years of their secondary schooling. Science subjects are not compulsory in the VCE, but can include Biology, Chemistry, Environmental Science, Physics, and Psychology.
References
Abrams, E., & Middleton, M. (2017). Towards multidimensional approaches to research on rural science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 167–176.
Albion, P. R., & Spence, K. G. (2013). “Primary connections” in a provincial Queensland school system: relationships to science teaching self-efficacy and practices. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(3), 501–520.
Aldous, C. (2008). Turning the tide: transforming science learning and teaching in rural and remote schools. Teaching Science, 54(3), 44–48.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2019). My School. https://www.myschool.edu.au/
Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: valuing local knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769.
Barley, Z., & Beesley, A. (2007). Rural school success: what can we learn? Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(1), 1–16.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation. (2013). Rural and remote education: literature review. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au/component/k2/item/42-rural-and-remote-education-literature-review
Clark, L., Majumdar, S., Bhattacharjee, J., & Hanks, A. C. (2015). Creating an atmosphere for STEM literacy in the rural south through student-collected weather data. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-066.1.
Connolly, N. (2017). NAP sample assessment science literacy 2015: public report. https://www.nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/20170309-nap_sl_final.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Corbett, M. (2014). Toward a geography of rural education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 37(3), 1–22.
Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Kasab, D. (2018). High school students’ reasons for their science dispositions: community-based innovative technology-embedded environmental research projects. Research in Science Education. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9735-6.
Echazarra, A., & Radinger, T. (2019). Learning in rural schools: insights from PISA, TALIS and the literature. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2019)4&docLanguage=En
Elam, M. E., Donham, B. L., & Solomon, S. R. (2012). An engineering summer program for underrepresented students from rural school districts. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 13(2), 35–44.
Gideon, L., & Moskos, P. (2012). Interviewing. In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 108–118). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_8.
Giles, D., & Bills, A. (2017). Designing and using an organisational culture inquiry tool to glimpse the relational nature of leadership and organisational culture within a South Australian primary school. School Leadership & Management, 37(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1293637.
Goodpaster, K. P., Adedokun, O. A., & Weaver, G. C. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: implications for rural teacher retention. The Rural Educator, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.408 .
Halsey, J. (2017). Independent review into regional, rural and remote education—a review of the literature 2006–2016 for the development of a discussion paper, a call for submissions and a national program of consultations. Commonwealth of Australia. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/irrrre_lit_review_accessible.pdf
Halsey, J. (2018). Independent review into regional, rural and remote education—final report. Commonwealth of Australia. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/01218_independent_review_accessible.pdf
Handal, B., Watson, K., Petocz, P., & Maher, M. (2013). Retaining mathematics and science teachers in rural and remote schools. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 23(3), 14–30.
Ihrig, L. M., Lane, E., Mahatmya, D., & Assouline, S. G. (2018). STEM excellence and leadership program: increasing the level of stem challenge and engagement for high-achieving students in economically disadvantaged rural communities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745158.
Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling Praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37–64). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903275_004.
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Praxis, practice and practice architectures. In S. Kemmis, J. Wilkinson, C. Edwards-Groves, I. Hardy, P. Grootenboer, & L. Bristol (Eds.), Changing practices, changing education (pp. 25–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_2.
Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing science: understanding the declines in senior high school science.Armidale: SiMERR Australia. https://simerr.une.edu.au/pages/projects/131choosingscience.pdf
Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia - The SiMERR National Survey. SiMERR Australia. https://simerr.une.edu.au/pages/projects/1nationalsurvey/Abridged%20report/Abridged_Full.pdf
Morris, J., Slater, E., Fitzgerald, M. T., Lummis, G. W., & van Etten, E. (2019). Using local rural knowledge to enhance STEM learning for gifted and talented students in Australia. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9823-2.
Murphy, S. (2018). The impact of school disadvantage on senior secondary science: A study of patterns of participation and achievement in government secondary schools in Victoria, Australia. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9745-4
Murphy, S. (2020). Achieving STEM education success against the oddss. Curriculum Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00110-8.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015: results in focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
Peterson, B. (2017). Bridging the STEM gap for rural students. School Administrator, 74(5), 28–32.
Peterson, B., Bornemann, G., Lydon, C., & West, K. (2015). Rural students in Washington state: STEM as a strategy for building rigor, postsecondary aspirations, and relevant career opportunities. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2015.1022397.
Reed, J. (2007). Appreciative inquiry. SAGE publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983464.
Rönnerman, K., & Kemmis, S. (2016). Stirring doctoral candidates into academic practices: a doctoral course and its practice architectures. Education Inquiry, 7(2), 27558. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.27558.
Semke, C. A., & Sheridan, S. M. (2012). Family-school connections in rural educational settings: a systematic review of the empirical literature. School Community Journal, 22(1), 21–47.
Smith, K. N., Jaeger, A. J., & Thomas, D. (2019). “Science Olympiad is why I’m here”: the influence of an early stem program on college and major choice. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09897-7.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2017a). PISA 2015: reporting Australia's results. Australian Council of Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/22/
Thomson, S., Wernert, N., O'Grady, E., & Rodrigues, S. (2017b). TIMSS 2015: reporting Australia's results. Australian Council of Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/timss_2015/2/
Tracy, S. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121.
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002534/253479E.pdf
Venville, G., Rennie, L., Hanbury, C., & Longnecker, N. (2013). Scientists reflect on why they chose to study science. Research in Science Education., 43(6), 2207–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9352-3.
Victorian Tertiary Admissions Centre. (2016). Prerequisites for 2018. VTAC. http://www.vtac.edu.au/files/pdf/publications/prerequisites-2018.pdf
Watson, J., Wright, S., Hay, I., Beswick, K., Allen, J., & Cranston, N. (2016). Rural and regional students' perceptions of schooling and factors that influence their aspirations. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 26(2), 4.
Weldon, P. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in Australian seconday schools. https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=policyinsights
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the support of the Victorian Department of Education and Training, along with his supervisors, A/Prof Lena Danaia and A/Prof Amy MacDonald, in completing this research.
Code Availability
Analysis used NVivo and thematic codes identified in the paper.
Funding
This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Programme (RTP) Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The paper and the research described within are the sole work of the author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, S. Science Education Success in a Rural Australian School: Practices and Arrangements Contributing to High Senior Science Enrolments and Achievement in an Isolated Rural School. Res Sci Educ 52, 325–337 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09947-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09947-5