Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Practitioner’s Inquiry into Vocabulary Building Strategies for Native Spanish Speaking ELLs in Inquiry-Based Science

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increase in global migration and the prioritization of English as an international language have resulted in science learning environments that include students whose primary language differs from the language of instruction. This worldwide phenomenon is not limited to geographical regions but occurs where diverse populations representing languages, cultures, ethnicities, and nationalities exist. English Language Learners (ELLs) in these classrooms face the task of learning science while learning to comprehend and participate in the discourse of science. Science teachers must therefore be strategic in providing experiences that will facilitate the development of ELLs’ literacy skills to do and engage science learning. We present how one middle school science teacher, engaging in practitioner inquiry, tapped into the potential of deliberate cognate instruction to support the learning of science vocabulary within the context of inquiry-based science teaching. The 7th grade teacher adapted a graphic organizer that served to focus on ELLs learning core ideas and through deliberate cognate instruction connected their Spanish language to English. Cognates, in conjunction with other teaching strategies, proved to be an effective way for the simultaneous learning of disciplinary content knowledge and vocabulary words. The knowledge generated from this practitioner inquiry had immediate impact and though not generalizable can offer insights beyond this immediate classroom. The Spanish-English cognate was a viable tool in bridging the language differences; however, we acknowledge that limitations will occur in classrooms where the languages may not have common roots to support cognate instructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A. L., Maher, C. A., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2018). Introduction: Language, Literacy, and Learning in the STEM Disciplines. In A. L. Bailey, C. A. Maher, & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.). Language, literacy, and learning in the STEM disciplines: how language counts for English learners. pp. 1-10. New York:Routledge.

  • Bharuthram, S., & Clarence, S. (2015). Teaching academic reading as a disciplinary knowledge practice in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(2), 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruna, K. R., Vann, R., & Escudero, M. P. (2007). What’s language got to do with it?: a case study of academic language instruction in a high school “English Learner Science” class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, C. A., & Lee, O. (2014). English language learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (2nd ed., pp. 204–222). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., Beeman, M., Davis, L. H., & Spharim, G. (1999). Relationship of metalinguistic capabilities and reading achievement for children who are becoming bilingual. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 20(4), 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler-Olcott, K. (2002). Teacher research as a self-extending system for practitioners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next generation. New York:Teachers College Press.

  • Dana, N. F. (2015). Understanding inquiry as stance: illustration and analysis of one teacher’s research work. LEARNing Landscapes, 8(2), 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2014). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-S6-S13.

  • Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, C. C. M., Deaton, B., & Koballa, T. (2014). Teachers’ awareness of their diverse classrooms: the nature of elementary teachers’ reflections on their science teaching practice. Action in Teacher Education, 36(3), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2014.917363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2009). English language teacher expertise: the elephant in the room. Language and Education, 23(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O. (2018). English language proficiency standards aligned with content standards. Educational Researcher, 47(5), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18763775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., Faller, S. E., & Kelley, J. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 196–228. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubliner, S., & Grisham, D. L. (2012). Cognate strategy instruction: providing powerful literacy tools to Spanish-speaking students. In J. Fingon & S. Ulanov (Eds.), Learning from culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: promoting success for all students, pp. 105–123. York: Teachers College Press.

  • Lubliner, S., & Hiebert, E. H. (2011). An analysis of English–Spanish cognates as a source of general academic language. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.568589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mkimbili, S. T., & Ødegaard, M. (2017). Student motivation in science subjects in Tanzania, including students’ voices. Research in Science Education, 1–25.

  • Nagy, W., García, G., Durgunogiu, A., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. (1993). English–Spanish bilingual students’ use of cognates in English reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(3), 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2015). The Nation’s Report Card: 2015 mathematics and reading assessments Retrieved: https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015136

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.4717978.

  • Ndalichako, J. L., & Komba, A. A. (2014). Students’ subject choice in secondary schools in Tanzania: a matter of students’ ability and interests or forced circumstances? Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(08), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyoo, S. O. (2017). Learner outcomes in science in South Africa: role of the nature of learner difficulties with the language for learning and teaching science. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9528-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R. M., Mesa, J., & Hayes, L. (2018). Meeting the demands of science reforms: A comprehensive professional development for practicing middle school teachers. Research in Science Education, 1-29.

  • Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: the role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: a fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., & Kim, Y. S. (2007). Large problem spaces: The challenge of vocabulary for English language learners. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 123–139). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition, National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2017). Profiles of English Learners (ELs). http://www.ncela.us/files/fast_facts/05-19-2017/ProfilesOfELs_FastFacts.pdf. Retrieved June 9, 2017.

  • Wessels, S. (2013). Science as a second language: integrating science and vocabulary instruction for English language learners. Science and Children, 51(1), 50–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, J. D. (2013). The question of teaching vocabulary: which words? In what ways? Voices from the Middle, 20(4), 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L. D., Hand, B., Goldman, S. R., Hildebrand, G. M., Osborne, J. F., Treagust, D. F., & Wallace, C. S. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 347–352.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is based upon support from the National Science Foundation under grant no. 1050166.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Christa McAuliffe Middle School, Boynton Beach, FL, USA

    R. T. Williams

  2. School of Teaching and Learning, University of Florida, 2-290 Norman Hall, PO Box 117048, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Rose M. Pringle & K. L. Kilgore

Authors
  1. R. T. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rose M. Pringle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. L. Kilgore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose M. Pringle.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, R.T., Pringle, R.M. & Kilgore, K.L. A Practitioner’s Inquiry into Vocabulary Building Strategies for Native Spanish Speaking ELLs in Inquiry-Based Science. Res Sci Educ 49, 989–1000 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9848-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9848-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation