A comparative study on scientific inquiry activities of Chinese science textbooks in high schools

Abstract

In response to the 2001 National curriculum review in China, which explicitly promotes scientific inquiry in science-related subjects, many editions of new textbooks were published. Among them, this study explored the quality of scientific inquiry in the most popular science textbooks. There are nine sets of high school science textbooks published by seven major Chinese publishers in this study. Through the content analysis of these textbooks, it is found that all the textbooks included the specific sections dedicated to scientific inquiry. The quality of scientific inquiry in these textbooks was explored on specific aspects including relevance to daily life, the explicit teaching guidance, the complete inquiry process and the openness of inquiry. The findings suggest that 53% of inquiry activities included close connections to daily life. However, there were very few textbooks providing explicit teaching guidance. In particular, regarding the inquiry process of “results implications” and “making new inquiries”, 4% and 9% of inquiry activities in the textbooks came with explicit teaching guidance. Moreover, most of the activities lacked the process of scientific inquiry, especially at the stage of “questioning”. The findings are also in accordance with other literature that states that most textbooks lack high-level, open-ended inquiries. This study suggests that science textbooks should include more relevant scientific inquiries with explicit teaching guidance, opportunities for students to experience the complete inquiry process and more student autonomy in conducting inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2004). College students’ views of nature of sience. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. (pp.389-425). Dordrecth, the Netherlands: Kluwer academic publishers.

  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Akerson, V. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.

  3. Aldahmash, A. H., Mansour, N. S., Alshamrani, S. M., & Almohi, S. (2016). An analysis of activities in saudi arabian middle school science textbooks and workbooks for the inclusion of essential features of inquiry. Research in Science Education, 46(6), 879–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Blueprint for Science Literacy. New York: Oxfords University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Education., 13(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, R. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme. In Abell S. K. &. Lederman N. G (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179-1203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  7. Babbie, E. R. (1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bell, R. L., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on students’ understanding on the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bybee, R. W. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning, and the science curriculum. In R. W. Bybee (Ed.), Learning science and the science of learning (pp. 25–35). Arlington: NSTA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bybee, R. W. (2008). Teaching science as inquiry: a 40-year personal perspective. In A Presentation for the 40th Anniversary of the Science Teaching Department at the Weizmann Institute of Science. Rehovot: Israe.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Camnalbur, M., Bayraktar, D. M., & Er Amuce, N. (2013). The effect of web-based instruction on achievement: a meta-analysis study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences.

  12. Cheung, D., & Ng, P. H. (2000). Science teachers’ beliefs about curriculum design. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991a). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1991b). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951.

  15. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2010). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.

  16. Clark, C. (1998). The professional development of teachers working with more able learners. Gifted Education International, 12, 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dunbar, K. (2002). Understanding the role of cognition in science: The science as category framework. The cognitive basis of science, 154–170.

  18. Dunne, J., Mahdi, A. E., & O'Reilly, J. (2013). Investigating the potential of Irish primary school textbooks in supporting Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE). International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1513–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Espinoza, F. (2017). Wave motion as inquiry : the physics and applications of light and sound. Cham: Springer.

  20. Forawi, S. S. (1996). The effects of the interaction of teachers' understanding of the nature of science, instructional strategy, and textbook on students' understanding of the nature of science. ProQuest: Dissertation Item, 9621877.

  21. Fuhrman, M., Lunetta, V. N., Novick, S., & Tamir, P. (1978). The laboratory structure and task analysis inventory (LAI): A user’s handbook. Science Education Center, Technical Report No. 14.

  22. Gao, X. (2002). A comparative study of scientific inquiry embodied in science textbooks of primary schools in China and the United States. Master’s dissertation of Nanjing Normal University in China.

  23. Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haney, J. J., & McArthur, J. M. (2002). Four case studies of prospective teacher beliefs regarding constructivist practice in the science classroom. Science Education, 86, 783–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herron, M.D. (1971). The nature of science enquiry.School review,79(3),171-212.

  26. Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ko, E. K. (2008). The relationship between fifth grade students’ understandings about evidenced-based explanations and their abilities to develop evidenced-based explanations. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J., & White, K. (2008). Linking progressive development of teachers’ understandings of nature of science and scientific inquiry with progressive development of instructional ability. Baltimore: Paper presented at the meeting of NARST.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford. B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.

  31. Li, X. Y., Tian, Z. Y., Shen, J. L., Hu, W. P., Chen, Y. H., & Wang, J. Y. (2018a). Analysis of five junior high school physics textbooks used in China for representations of nature of science. Research in Science Education, 48(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, X. Y., Wang, L. S., Shen, J. L., Wang, J. Y., Hu, W. P., Chen, Y. H., & Tian, R. H. (2018b). Analysis and comparison of scientific inquiry activities in eighth-grade physics textbooks in China. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ma, Y. J., & Wan, Y. L. (2017). History of science content analysis of Chinese science textbooks from the perspective of acculturation. Science & Education, 26(6), 669–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  35. McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT (2nd ed.). Maine: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2001a). Chinese outline of basic curriculum reform (trial implementation). Beijing Normal University Press.

  38. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2001b). Full-time compulsory education science (grade 3-6, grade 7-9) curriculum standards (experimental draft). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moore, J. A. (1993). Science as a way of knowing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(3), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pella, M. O. (1967). Science literacy and high school curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 67, 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pizzini, E. L., Shepardson, D. P., & Abell, S. K. (1991). The inquiry level of junior high activities: implications to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ramnarain, U., & Hobden, P. (2015). Shifting South African learners towards greater autonomy in scientific investigations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(1), 94–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein, The teaching of science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  47. Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1981). Inquiry-related tasks in high school science laboratory handbooks. Science Education, 65(5), 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Van den Akker, J. J. H. (1998). The science curriculum: between ideals and outcomes. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 421–447). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yang, W. Y., & Liu, E. S. (2017). Development and validation of an instrument for evaluating inquiry-based tasks in science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2688–2711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wei, B. (2006). Concept and practice of scientific literacy education - research on science curriculum development. Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wei, H. Y. (2003). Analysis of biology textbooks in British secondary schools. Biology Teaching, 5, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Support was provided by the National Natural Science Fund of China (71704116) and Beijing Social Science Fund of Research Base (16JDJYA007). Hainan Province Higher Education and Teaching Reform Research Project (Hnjg2017-258).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingying Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Wang, T., Wang, J. et al. A comparative study on scientific inquiry activities of Chinese science textbooks in high schools. Res Sci Educ (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09902-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chinese science textbook
  • High schools
  • Inquiry activities
  • Scientific inquiry