Skip to main content
Log in

How Do Chemistry Teachers Deal with Students' Incorrect/Undesired Responses to Oral Classroom Questions? Exploring Effective Feedback Practices

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, chemistry teachers’ reactions/behavior or actions following students’ undesired, unexpected or incorrect responses/answers to the posed teacher oral questions are reported. This study which was carried out in Tanzania in Iringa Municipality involved three chemistry teachers teaching in three different secondary schools. Actual teaching situations of the three teachers were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interpretively. We also performed semi-structured interviews with these teachers to bring forth the teachers’ inherent perceptions about their practice in relation to what was observed of the teachers’ individual actual teaching situations. Up to eight different forms of teachers’ responses or reactions to students’ undesired responses or incorrect answers are discussed with respect to how each is perceived to either positively or negatively affect students’ progressive learning. From the study, productive questioning is affected by teachers’ inability to effectively use classroom powers to trigger students’ thinking, as well as not being able to use students’ varied views to achieve the set learning goals. Instead of using their power strategies to facilitate students’ engagement with the scientific matter, the teachers used their classroom powers to guard themselves against classroom insecurities during the teaching process, such as preventing students from questioning their subject knowledge competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albergaria-Almeida, P. (2010). Classroom questioning: teachers’ perceptions and practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.015

  • Andersson-Bakken, E., & Klette, K. (2016). Teachers’ use of questions and responses to students’ contributions during whole class discussions: Comparing language arts and science classrooms. In K. Klette, O. K. Bergem, & A. Roe (Eds.), Teaching and learning in lower secondary schools in the era of PISA and TIMSS (pp. 63–84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blosser, P. E. (1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington, OH: Education Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker-Groen, A., Van der Schaaf, M., & Stokking, K. (2015). Teachers' questions and responses during teacher-student feedback dialogues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.937359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohrn, S. W., & Dohn, N. B. (2018). The role of teacher questions in the chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00196g.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach, H., Dor-Ziderman, Y., & Yefroimsky, Y. (2014). Question asking in the science classroom: Teacher attitudes and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9451-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R. (1966). Ask the right questions! The Clearing House, 41(4), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/30180565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D. (1970). The use of questions in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 40(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (2006). How effective are teacher-initiated classroom questions in enhancing student learning. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 279–293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannel, I. (2009). Insufficient questioning. The Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/40345093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayima, F. (2016). Question classification taxonomies as guides to formulating questions for use in chemistry classrooms. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 353–364.

  • Kayima, F. (2018). Exploring chemistry teachers’ perspectives on questioning and providing a new way of analyzing teacher questions in science classrooms. (PhD (Doctoral) thesis), The University of Bergen, Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1956/17355.

  • Kayima, F., & Jakobsen, A. (2018). Exploring the situational adequacy of teacher questions in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9696-9.

  • Lee, H.-J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tzialli, D. (2012). Identification, interpretation—Evaluation, response: An alternative framework for analyzing teacher discourse in science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1823–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.671971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucking, R. A. (1978). Developing question-conscious language arts teachers. Language Arts, 55(5), 578–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkimbili, S. T., Tiplic, D., & Ødegaard, M. (2017). The role played by contextual challenges in practising inquiry-based science teaching in Tanzania secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1333752.

  • McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation., 94(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364.

  • Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902954273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoEVT. (2007). Chemistry syllabus for secondary schools. Retrieved from Dar es Salaam:

  • Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education : The contribution of research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, A., Passler, A., & Tiemann, R. (2017). The complexity of teacher questions in chemistry classrooms: An empirical analysis on the basis of two competence models. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9683-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurrenbern, S. C., & Robinson, W. R. (1998). Conceptual questions and challenge problems. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(11), 1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsvold, L. A., & Cochran, K. F. (2017). Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9235-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. R. (1977). The effect of question-asking instruction on preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(4), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660140415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. P. (1986). The effects of teachers' wait-time and knowledge comprehension questioning on science achievement., 23(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230407.

  • Roth, W. M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Row, M. B. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control: Part one-wait-time., 11(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660110202.

  • Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time. Slowing down may be a way of speeding up!, 37(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B. (1996). Science, silence, and sanctions. Science and Children, 34(1), 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, G. E., Strykowski, B., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The effects of teacher questioning levels on student achievement: A quantitative synthesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/40539640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. M. (1972). A second look at classroom questions. The High School Journal, 55(6), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/40365787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons., 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131.

  • Siddiquee, M. N.-E. A., & Ikeda, H. (2013). Science talk in the secondary classrooms: Analysis of teachers’ feedback. European Scientific Journal, 9(22), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R. (1912). The question as a measure of efficiency in instruction: A critical study of class-room practice. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stierer, B., & Maybin, J. (1993). Language, literacy and learning in educational practice : A reader. Clevedon: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I. (2009). Scaffolding in the writing center: A microanalysis of an experienced Tutor’s verbal and nonverbal tutoring strategies. Written Communication, 26(4), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309342364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1986). Effects of teacher wait time on discourse characteristics in mathematics and language arts classes. American Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Capie, W. (1980). The effects of teacher wait-time and questioning quality on middle school science achievement. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/63613028?accountid=12870

  • Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, C.-Y. (2014). General instructional methods and strategies. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 303–320). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Schaaf, M., Baartman, L., Prins, F., Oosterbaan, A., & Schaap, H. (2013). Feedback dialogues that stimulate Students' reflective thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Discourse, power and access. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 93–113). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997a). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997b). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0602_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vanZee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandela, E. L. (2014). Tanzania post-colonial educational system and perspectives on secondary science education, pedagogy, and curriculum: A qualitative study. Chicago: DePaul University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T., & Mkongo, S. (2013). Classroom discourse. In F. Vavrus & L. Bartlett (Eds.), Teaching in tension: International pedagogies, national policies, and teachers’ practices in Tanzania (Vol. 1, pp. 149–168). Rotterdam: Sense publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind : A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilen, W. W. (1984). Implications of research on questioning for the teacher educator. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 17(2), 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xun, G., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, D. Y. (2004). Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education (Society of Biology), 38(2), 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ødegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S. M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2014). Challenges and support when teaching science through an integrated inquiry and literacy approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 2997–3020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.942719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Festo Kayima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayima, F., Mkimbili, S.T. How Do Chemistry Teachers Deal with Students' Incorrect/Undesired Responses to Oral Classroom Questions? Exploring Effective Feedback Practices. Res Sci Educ 51 (Suppl 2), 647–668 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09876-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09876-y

Keywords

Navigation