Abstract
In this paper, chemistry teachers’ reactions/behavior or actions following students’ undesired, unexpected or incorrect responses/answers to the posed teacher oral questions are reported. This study which was carried out in Tanzania in Iringa Municipality involved three chemistry teachers teaching in three different secondary schools. Actual teaching situations of the three teachers were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interpretively. We also performed semi-structured interviews with these teachers to bring forth the teachers’ inherent perceptions about their practice in relation to what was observed of the teachers’ individual actual teaching situations. Up to eight different forms of teachers’ responses or reactions to students’ undesired responses or incorrect answers are discussed with respect to how each is perceived to either positively or negatively affect students’ progressive learning. From the study, productive questioning is affected by teachers’ inability to effectively use classroom powers to trigger students’ thinking, as well as not being able to use students’ varied views to achieve the set learning goals. Instead of using their power strategies to facilitate students’ engagement with the scientific matter, the teachers used their classroom powers to guard themselves against classroom insecurities during the teaching process, such as preventing students from questioning their subject knowledge competencies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albergaria-Almeida, P. (2010). Classroom questioning: teachers’ perceptions and practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.015
Andersson-Bakken, E., & Klette, K. (2016). Teachers’ use of questions and responses to students’ contributions during whole class discussions: Comparing language arts and science classrooms. In K. Klette, O. K. Bergem, & A. Roe (Eds.), Teaching and learning in lower secondary schools in the era of PISA and TIMSS (pp. 63–84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Blosser, P. E. (1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington, OH: Education Associates.
Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132.
Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170533.
Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100.
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171.
Dekker-Groen, A., Van der Schaaf, M., & Stokking, K. (2015). Teachers' questions and responses during teacher-student feedback dialogues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.937359.
Dohrn, S. W., & Dohn, N. B. (2018). The role of teacher questions in the chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00196g.
Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501.
Eshach, H., Dor-Ziderman, Y., & Yefroimsky, Y. (2014). Question asking in the science classroom: Teacher attitudes and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9451-y.
Fraenkel, J. R. (1966). Ask the right questions! The Clearing House, 41(4), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/30180565.
Gall, M. D. (1970). The use of questions in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 40(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169463.
Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (2006). How effective are teacher-initiated classroom questions in enhancing student learning. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 279–293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hannel, I. (2009). Insufficient questioning. The Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/40345093.
Kayima, F. (2016). Question classification taxonomies as guides to formulating questions for use in chemistry classrooms. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 353–364.
Kayima, F. (2018). Exploring chemistry teachers’ perspectives on questioning and providing a new way of analyzing teacher questions in science classrooms. (PhD (Doctoral) thesis), The University of Bergen, Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1956/17355.
Kayima, F., & Jakobsen, A. (2018). Exploring the situational adequacy of teacher questions in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9696-9.
Lee, H.-J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.007.
Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tzialli, D. (2012). Identification, interpretation—Evaluation, response: An alternative framework for analyzing teacher discourse in science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1823–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.671971.
Lucking, R. A. (1978). Developing question-conscious language arts teachers. Language Arts, 55(5), 578–582.
Mkimbili, S. T., Tiplic, D., & Ødegaard, M. (2017). The role played by contextual challenges in practising inquiry-based science teaching in Tanzania secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1333752.
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation., 94(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364.
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902954273.
MoEVT. (2007). Chemistry syllabus for secondary schools. Retrieved from Dar es Salaam:
Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education : The contribution of research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Nehring, A., Passler, A., & Tiemann, R. (2017). The complexity of teacher questions in chemistry classrooms: An empirical analysis on the basis of two competence models. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9683-9.
Nurrenbern, S. C., & Robinson, W. R. (1998). Conceptual questions and challenge problems. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(11), 1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p1502.
Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002.
Reinsvold, L. A., & Cochran, K. F. (2017). Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9235-2.
Rice, D. R. (1977). The effect of question-asking instruction on preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(4), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660140415.
Riley, J. P. (1986). The effects of teachers' wait-time and knowledge comprehension questioning on science achievement., 23(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230407.
Roth, W. M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R.
Row, M. B. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control: Part one-wait-time., 11(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660110202.
Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time. Slowing down may be a way of speeding up!, 37(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700110.
Rowe, M. B. (1996). Science, silence, and sanctions. Science and Children, 34(1), 35–37.
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015.
Samson, G. E., Strykowski, B., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The effects of teacher questioning levels on student achievement: A quantitative synthesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/40539640.
Sanders, N. M. (1972). A second look at classroom questions. The High School Journal, 55(6), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/40365787.
Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons., 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131.
Siddiquee, M. N.-E. A., & Ikeda, H. (2013). Science talk in the secondary classrooms: Analysis of teachers’ feedback. European Scientific Journal, 9(22), 87.
Stevens, R. (1912). The question as a measure of efficiency in instruction: A critical study of class-room practice. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Stierer, B., & Maybin, J. (1993). Language, literacy and learning in educational practice : A reader. Clevedon: Open University.
Thompson, I. (2009). Scaffolding in the writing center: A microanalysis of an experienced Tutor’s verbal and nonverbal tutoring strategies. Written Communication, 26(4), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309342364.
Tobin, K. (1986). Effects of teacher wait time on discourse characteristics in mathematics and language arts classes. American Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162953.
Tobin, K., & Capie, W. (1980). The effects of teacher wait-time and questioning quality on middle school science achievement. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/63613028?accountid=12870
Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, C.-Y. (2014). General instructional methods and strategies. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 303–320). New York, NY: Routledge.
Van der Schaaf, M., Baartman, L., Prins, F., Oosterbaan, A., & Schaap, H. (2013). Feedback dialogues that stimulate Students' reflective thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628693.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Discourse, power and access. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 93–113). London: Routledge.
van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997a). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190206.
van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997b). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0602_3.
vanZee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269.
Wandela, E. L. (2014). Tanzania post-colonial educational system and perspectives on secondary science education, pedagogy, and curriculum: A qualitative study. Chicago: DePaul University.
Webb, T., & Mkongo, S. (2013). Classroom discourse. In F. Vavrus & L. Bartlett (Eds.), Teaching in tension: International pedagogies, national policies, and teachers’ practices in Tanzania (Vol. 1, pp. 149–168). Rotterdam: Sense publishers.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind : A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Wilen, W. W. (1984). Implications of research on questioning for the teacher educator. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 17(2), 31–35.
Xun, G., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504836.
Yip, D. Y. (2004). Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education (Society of Biology), 38(2), 76–83.
Ødegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S. M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2014). Challenges and support when teaching science through an integrated inquiry and literacy approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 2997–3020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.942719.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors reported no potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kayima, F., Mkimbili, S.T. How Do Chemistry Teachers Deal with Students' Incorrect/Undesired Responses to Oral Classroom Questions? Exploring Effective Feedback Practices. Res Sci Educ 51 (Suppl 2), 647–668 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09876-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09876-y